And also, how would you use the comparison test to determine if sums like this one is convergent or not?
sum( (sqrt(n) - 1)/(n^2 + 1) )
Thanks for the method guys...
For the second step, its unintuitive to me how you can just chuck the e^(4t) into the Re(...) ?
Okay for the following problems, I know how to identify which is a real vector space with the usual operations or wihch is not, but I just don't know how to prove it in writing! Could you help me out? Thank you.To prove it in writing: if you think it is a vector space, show that it satisfies the desired properties. For example, if
a) Set of real polynomials of any degree
b) Set of real polynomials of degree =< n.
c) Set of real polynomials of degree exactly n.
I don't exactly know where to post this. Can you guys help me with it?Don't worry, I got it now. :)
Thanks in advance
- Attached question
For the basis of a subset, put the vectors you have in matrix form:
Next, you find the row reduced echelon form, I'll assume that you know how to do this already:
So the column space is clearly the first two rows of the original martix
Thus, a basis is:
Hope that helps!
Thanks. Does this method work for all subspaces?
How do I show that the set (a,b,a-b,a+b) is closed under addition and scalar multiplication (R^4)?
How do I put the set of vectors {(2 1; 0 0), (0 0; 2 1), (3 -1; 0 0), (0 0; 3 1)} into a matrix with each vector as a column? Thanks
How do I do this question?
Find a basis for the solution space of the following system in five variables:
-x1 - x2 -3*x4 - x5 = 0
3*x1 + 3*x2 - x3 -3*x4 + x5 = 0
The answer gives me a 3x5 matrix but I don't know how this is possible if there are only 2 rows in the system?
I'm having a bit of trouble with this question -
Find the distance from the point (1,0,0) to the line through the points (1,2,0) and (-1,1,1)
Any help would really be appreciated! :)
prove that if all the rows of a matrix add up to the same number k, then k is an eigenvalue of this matrix. Describe one possible eigenvector corresponding to this special eigenvalue.
So just evaluate Av where v is the column vector you have provided us. Each entry is in fact a sum of entries in a row (think about the definition of matrix multiplication.
no no I was supposed to prove it first THEN HENCE find v, not the other way around. but dont worry, it's kool. I mucked around with determinants and the characteristic polynomial and got it eventually. it's not a very slick method tho.. Kamil9876 if u have a suggestion as to the proof (without using v first!) I'd love to hear it! or anyone else for that matter haha. thnx.
How is demonstrating that k is an eigenvalue not enough proof? Not every mathematical proof has to be a direct proof. This is an example of a proof by construction, which is equally valid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_construction
that if all the rows of a matrix add up to the same number k, then k is an eigenvalue of this matrix.
So explain please how to use proof by construction
When the universe of discourse has only two variables, how do I determine Z?
But of course theOhhhhh! Thank you, makes so much more sense.do not have to be distinct! So you want to find
such that
. Take
and you see that indeed
is true. Hence the statement is true: there do exist such
.
How do I find the eigenvector of a 2x2 matrix?
So for
3 -2
2 -2
I've found that the eigenvalues are -2 and 1.
So 5x-2y=0 and 2x=0. How do I solve for the eigenvector from here? What do I let equal to the parameter?And for your question, yes you do let a parameter, say t, equal y. Then let t equal a convenient number. t=1 is always pretty good!
Note these equations would also be incorrect
Thanks
Ok thanks. Does it matter whether I let x or y be the parameter?
It's just a maths question..but I'm trying to find the dimensions of a rectangular box which is open at the top, having volume V and possessing the least surface area. My question to you however is... if it's a rectangular box does that mean that the side faces are both equal? Do you get what I'm saying ? Like would it still work if I wrote down the volume as not V=xyz, but V=x^2z? Do you get me?
1 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 1 1
That RREF isn't right. It should beCode: [Select]1 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 -1
0 0 0 0 1 1
The answer is x1=t, x3=-t, x4=-1, x5=1,
Since this is university maths, I assume you have come across the identity:.
Since this is university maths, I assume you have come across the identity:could you show me the working out please. thanks.
could you show me the working out please. thanks
Hmm, M-D I'm not sure if you're doing Uni Maths, or UMEP. Perhaps clarifying would help :)
There's a difference? ???
how can i express the following in Cartesian form a+ib:AHAHAHAHAHAHA SORRY M-D I did't actually answer your question.
the answer in the solutions is
thanks
thanks Alwin. how to do get the theta and phi symbols in Latex?\phi \Phi
I thought in mod 2 there are only two numbers 0 and 1?
So, you have the identity:See my other post, Re: Uni Maths Questions, if you still want the formal proof.
Continuing, so you now have:
TADAAAA :D
Thanks Mao!
Could someone help me with this question as well?
Without having to find the linear transformation matrix, how do I calculate the dimensions of the image and kernel for the linear transformation:
R: R^3->R^3 by reflection in the plane x+y+z=1 ?
So I know that dim(Ker) = nullity of R and dim(Im) = rank of R but I don't know whether these facts are of any use in this question?
i have a question which say: solve the following separable differential equations whose right hand side depends only on.
1)![]()
2)
how would i go about solving this. it does not really look like a separable diff. equation because it is only with respect to. thanks
1) Use the complex exponential to expressFirstly we can use the complex exponential to obtain the result below, then we can find an equivalent term by expanding using the binomial theorem.in terms of
and
Hope that helps :)
Hi guys. Could someone explain to me how the quadric x^2+8xy+7y^2=9 is equivalent to the hyperbola u^2 - v^2/9 =1? ThanksHow much do you know about rotations and stuff (for getting rid of the xy term)? I don't wanna explain stuff you already know. :P
Change thethx :)into
, then expand out the integral. The first term is easy to int, the second you can use integration by parts.
Is there any webpage with a list of all those identities?Wikipedia -> List of trigonometry identities
Hi guys. Could someone explain to me how the quadric x^2+8xy+7y^2=9 is equivalent to the hyperbola u^2 - v^2/9 =1? ThanksSomething I've just come across while cramming for my linear algebra exam. Going to try and explain the theory first, but once we actually get to working it out it's not that long.
So we must show thatfor
Nowas
is linear.
On the other hand we also haveby the definition of inverse.
Thus we have. Now since
is bijective it is also injective and so
.
(Remember, injective meansimplies
)
I leave you to do the exact same thing to check the scalar multiplication condition. :)
Here's how I would write up my proof:Thanks for formal maths...I finally end up with the same result as yours after realising that 2r^2 is much more proper function than 2r^3 for the values between 0 and 1. Thanks again
Forand using shifted polar coordinates
with
,
, so that
, we can write
and so by the fact thatand
for all
, together with the triangle inequality, we have that
for.
So for any, we let
and it follows by the previous argument that
implies that
for all. We therefore conclude that
Just a general question. How do we find potential field such that F=Gradf ...isn't it just integratating component by component then adding them up?