ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: bucket on February 09, 2008, 02:18:44 pm
-
Don't think theres a point in making a new thread every time I can't work out a painfully easy question, so I'll just copy bec and dump them all into one thread.
Anyway
I forgot how to factorise LOL
is a factor of
, factorise f(x).
-
Many ways to do this. I'll be going with "by inspection"
let f(x) = 3x^3 + 2x^2 - 19x + 6
If 3x - 1 is a factor, then it can be assumed that:
(3x - 1)(x^2 + Ax - 6) = 3x^3 + 2x^2 - 19x + 6 = f(x)
If you're wondering how I got that, multiply 3x by x^2 to get the 3x^3 term. Multiply -1 by - 6 to get the +6 term. In the MIDDLE, the Ax term represents an unknown because we don't yet know what value of A will give us the two middle terms, 2x^2 and -19x.
HOWEVER, we now expand out:
let q(x) = f(x) = (3x - 1)(x^2 + Ax - 6) = 3x^3 + 3Ax^2 - 18x - x^2 - Ax + 6
= 3x^3 + (3A - 1)x^2 - (A + 18)x + 6
BUT we know that q(x) = f(x)
Therefore, 3x^3 + (3A - 1)x^2 - (A + 18)x + 6 = 3x^3 + 2x^2 - 19x + 6
equation co-efficients: 3 = 3, 3A - 1 = 2, -(A + 18) = -19, and 6 = 6
See? We obtain the correctly found co-efficients from before.
To solve the UNKNOWN 'A' co-efficient, set 3A - 1 = 2 => 3A = 3 and therefore, A = 1. You can check that A = 1 by solving equation 2: -(A + 18) = -19, therefore A + 18 = 19 => A = 1
so if A = 1 you get f(x) = q(x) = (3x-1)(x^2 + x - 6)
Using cross method: x 3
x -2
therefore f(x) = (3x - 1)(x + 3)(x - 2) = 3x^3 + 2x^2 - 19x + 6
-
N.B. Whilst that looks very longwinded, I was explaining all steps. If you master this method it can be 3-4 lines on an exam paper.
Also, if that's the first time you've seen this method, it's a lot to digest. If you have any questions don't hesitate. This method is very powerful and gets rid of the frustration of long division.
-
Wow.
No you explained it very clearly, which is surprising since most of the time people go straight to the point without explaining why they take the steps they do and leave me thinking like wtf.
Thanks for that!
-
Mmmm
Could someone show me the proper way to find the intercepts of a graph such as this;
 = \dfrac{2}{(x - 3)^3} + 4)
I know the general shape of the graph, just the intercepts in the answer have like numbers with cubed routes and shit, and I have no idea how they get there :P
-
y-intercept:

 = \frac{2}{(-3)^3} + 4 = \frac{106}{27})
x-intercept: 
^3} + 4)
^3)


-
its so simple.
aduhhhh
thanks.
-
Okay this annoyed me because I was going well in this exercise until I bumped into this equation:
A transformation is defined by the matrix
. Find the equation of the image of the graph of the straight line with equation
under this transformation.
I think the problem is that the transformation includes a reflection in the line y=x, and I have no fucking idea what that is supposed to mean rofl.
-
A reflection in the line
is the inverse. That means you just swap
and
around in your equation. (i.e:
when reflected becomes
)
-
so:
let
be the image line

and 
subbing back into the orgininal equation:


now since v is the image of y and u is the image of x, our new equation is:

Hope that helped :)
-
wonderful =]
-
Question to do with quadratics..........
The dimensions of an enclosure are shown. The perimeter of the enclosure is 160m.
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y289/Taksi_/q5.jpg)
a. Find the rule for the area,
, of the enclosure in terms of
-
Perimeter:


(20-y) = 20x + (12-x)(20-80+x) = 20x + (12-x)(x-60))
)
-
mm, in the answers (note these were given by the teacher so i don't know if the answers are 100% correct), it says that the solution is
-
Fixed. I got the perimeter wrong.
-
ahhh thankyou so much mr coblin.
you have proven to be more help than my math teacher yet again!
-
HOLD ON!! lol
Why is it
(12 - x)(20 - y) and not (x - 12)(y - 20)??
-
No idea why I wrote it like that, I must have been high.
It's the same thing (mathematically) though, because you can take out a factor of -1 from both the brackets, and
, haha.
-
haha!! oh okay, thanks =]
-
Oh god this question is embarassing.
I literally slept in class during methods last year and now I'm behind on many topics, especially logarithms and exponentials
Simplify 
I'm getting
as my answer but the book says the answer is
-
Simplify 
Since
and 
^2 * (3^3)^3)



Remember:
-
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
how could i have not worked it out myself T_T
*bangs head with saucepan*
-
*bangs head with saucepan*
lol. if u ever did that id piss myself haha
-
Ok, when I'm solving questions such as
"Simplify
expressing your answer in positive exponent form"
I get confused whilst working the answer out because there are so many different calculations to do and I end up all over the place.
Does anyone have any tips or tricks they used to make things more methodical when solving problems such as this? Or do I just need to get used to it? lol
-
Try splitting the problem into small bits, so for this problem:
"Simplify ^2}{xyz^{-1}})
First tackle the brackets, removing the square from the bracket:
^2)
Which when squared through becomes: )
Then just tackle the original top line of the equation:

which becomes, after adding all the powers etc. etc: 
Then we consider this top line and then the bottom line:

which becomes: 
Which when expressed in positive exponent form becomes:
-
sweet thanks lol.
-
Simplify

I'm getting
when the answer is 
Thanks to anyone who helps =]
-

^\frac{-1}{4} * (2^4)^\frac{-3}{4})

Adding the powers, we get:
-
thanks alot dcc
okayyy.. i have another question >.<
, Solve for n.
-







-
ahhhhh, interesting way of doing that :p
thanks alot man
-
Hm... it's pretty standard. A more clever approach (less 'hack at the problem' method) would be to recognise that 3 and 9 are related by a power of 2, although it's all the same:

^2} = 1)



Since
, or by taking the
of both sides:

Or maybe you think it's strange because I didn't bring the denominator to the RHS? Meh, haha, whatever works for you - the operations you do will be essentially the same.
-
eh
Solve 
I'm getting
and it says the answer is 
what am I doing wrong? lol
-
yay I can do this one!
So first you need to make sure everything has the same base: 2.
This gives: } = 2^{5} )
Now, remembering your exponential rules, you can ADD the powers on the LHS.
This gives: +(4x +2)} = 2^{5} )
Lastly, equate the powers. (What you're doing here is taking the log base 2 of everything)
This gives: 



hope that helps!
-
ah... stupid little errors on my part (N)
thanks alot bec!
-
Ok I have another one....
-10(2^{x})+2 = 0)
The answer is 0, -2
-
Let


(4A-1)=0)

-
eh.
I dont understand where 0 and -2 come from.
-

We know that
and
using the null factor theorem.
substituting in
gives:
and

= 1 therefore

=
therefore
**
**

change of base law


-
ohh, thanks heaps man.
-
Simplify
.
Ack, I don't know what to do when faced with two different bases lol.
-
well,
(since
)
so another way of writing this would be:
since  = b)
then, just continuing as you normally would, adding and dividing as necessary:
-
mm.
the question says 'simplify without using a calculator' (i didn't write it coz i didn't think it would be relevant =\)
and the answer is 9?
I'm assuming it solved for x.......?
-
 + log_3(145) - log_3(5))
 - log3(5))
 + log_3(5) - log3(5))
)
Which is as far as that one will go :P
-
mm... i don't know how it gets 9
-
the question must be wrong, because if you manually type the question into the calculator, you get an answer of roughly 10.6 ish
-
ah ok, thanks =].
Then how do you work this one out;
-
if the question was
then the answer would be 9 :)
-
 - log_9(27))
 - log_9(3^3))
Since
and
, we can rewrite as:
 - log_9(9^\frac{3}{2}))

-
if the question was
then the answer would be 9 :)
That's what I wrote! lol
How is it worked out??
Oh and thanks for solving that other problem.
-
Simplify
.
Ack, I don't know what to do when faced with two different bases lol.
thats what you wrote :)
-
LOL...whoops...sorry :p
-
 + log_3(45) - log_3(5))
we know that  = 7)
and from our log laws:
 - log_3(5) = log_3(\dfrac{45}{5}) = log_3(9) = log_3(3^2) = 2)
Adding these, you get 9
-
Lol thanks for all of that dcc.
-
uhm..
Simplify the following expressions:
^2 + 2(x^2y)^4)
and
^4}{2x^3y^2})
thanks in advance!
-
^2 + 2(x^2y)^4)
= 
= )
^4}{2x^3y^2})
=}{2x^3y^2})
=
=
-
Uhm, can somebody confirm these answers?
Not that I think you're wrong toothpick, it's just that I left my text book at school and the pdf of answers on the cd starts at chapter 14 for some strange reason, and well I don't remember the answers being like that :|
You are probably right though, my memory isn't always reliable.
-
They're correct, but the first one might not be "simplified." That's sort of subjective. The second line (expanded form) might be considered as simplified. Exam questions aren't this ambiguous - they will specify a "form" to put the answer in (e.g: "Express your answer in the form
")
-
Okay! Thankyou both!
-
Express as the logarithm of a single term:
-\frac{1}{3}log_{10}(b))
edit
also;
=6)
and
Evaluate:
-
Third/last one:
+log_2(1)+2log_2(2))
+log_2(1)+log_2(4))


because 

and 
alternatively:
+log_2(1)+log_2(4))
Use the log laws
)
)
-
First One

)


Second One
Note: I'm assuming you want to work out x
 = 6 )
 = 3 )

PS: I hate LaTeX
-
thanks a heap guys =]
you are a great help!
-
First One

)


Second One
Note: I'm assuming you want to work out x
 = 6 )
 = 3 )

PS: I hate LaTeX
:O WHY?! I HATE ASCII MATH. BLOODY EWW. Srsly, you can't read anything in that format.
ftw
-
Simplify

this shit isn't clicking with me =\
-
-
That's what I got.
But the answer is
-
Cob, shouldn't that be
-
First One

)


Second One
Note: I'm assuming you want to work out x
 = 6 )
 = 3 )

PS: I hate LaTeX
:O WHY?! I HATE ASCII MATH. BLOODY EWW. Srsly, you can't read anything in that format.
ftw
I'd rather just write the damn thing on paper. Took me seconds to work it out on paper, took 15 mins to typeset it onto here.
-
That's what I got.
But the answer is 
That's wrong.
Cob, shouldn't that be 
Yeah, fixed, thanks.
-
Wouldn't it be
??
Because
right?
nevertheless, the answer is somehow -x, anybody know why?
-
Wouldn't it be
??
Because
right?
nevertheless, the answer is somehow -x, anybody know why?
No, because it is
.
The answer is wrong.
-
ah I see.
thanks coblin.
-
Funnily, I did that mistake too when I was checking over that answer
Bucket: Cause remember, Bob* is not omniscient
*Back of book
-
-x would be the answer to
though.
-
Funnily, I did that mistake too when I was checking over that answer
Bucket: Cause remember, Bob* is not omniscient
*Back of book
rofl, but coblin is ;)
stupid bob...
-x would be the answer to
though.
huh?
-
He's saying that the book may have mistyped (or you may have misread) the question. If the problem was
as opposed to
, then the answer would in fact be
.
-
Well

-
Well 
I see!
He's saying that the book may have mistyped (or you may have misread) the question. If the problem was
as opposed to
, then the answer would in fact be
.
I know that's what he was saying!
Stupid book;
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y289/Taksi_/stupidbook.jpg)
maybe it did mean
-
This wouldn't happen to be the Essential Textbook would it?
-
Yeah it is, how did you know?
-
It's the textbook we used for Methods when I did it (last year). Kinda recognise the font.
-
Solve for x:
-
1 = log_e(e)
therefore,
log_e(x) + log_e(3x+1) = log_e(e)
log_e(x(3x+1)) = log_e(e) ... (using the log laws)
therefore, x(3x+1) = e
... cbf solving that.
-
do you use the quadratic equation to solve it?
-
yep
-
thanks man.
-
Two questions =\
1) If
and
, express
in terms of a and c.
2) Prove that +log_{10}(\frac{c^2}{ab})-log_{10}(bc)=0)
The answer for 1 is
-
2) Prove that +log_{10}(\frac{c^2}{ab})-log_{10}(bc)=0)
-
thanks neo.
-
i think you meant "If
and
"
)
)
 + log_{10}(x^3) + log_{10}(y^{-\frac{5}{2}}))
 + log_{10}(x^3) + log_{10}(y^{-\frac{5}{2}}))
 + 3log_{10}(x) + {-\frac{5}{2}}log_{10}(y))
-
Ah shit. I did too.
Sorry man.
Thanks for the help!
-
How would you find the intercept and asymptote of the graph
-

: 




Therefore, the x-intercept is at )
: 
There are no solutions. The domain of this graph is
, so
cannot be put into this equation. We know this because we know the logarithm function only accepts values greater than zero.
The asymptote is:
. The asymptote for a typical logarithm graph is always
unless there have been transformations applied to it (specifically, a translation parallel to the x-axis). In this case, there has been no translation, so the asymptote has not moved. The asymptote corresponds to the "edge" (not mathematical term) of the domain. For example, the domain is
, so the asymptote is
.
-
Cheers coblin.
-

solve for x expressing answer as the exact value.
-
Method 1
Notice that })
Therefore, })^{x+1})
 \log_2 {3})
Method 2
Take log of both sides

-
thanks ahmed... uhm is there any way to make x the subject?
-
With the second method
Divide the Left Hand Side by
.
Divide the Right Hand Side by 
You end up getting 
Then you can use long division to break that up.
_1____
x + 1 | x - 1
x + 1
-------
- 2
Thus  )
The rest is just simple algebraic manipulation.
-
Traditionally, you could just expand all the terms and collect the
es to one side.
-
True that, what didn't I think of that? lol
-
if you multiplied by two on both sides:

then take log2 on both sides

log_2 3 )

:D didnt even touch rational functions :D
-
ah thanks for the help guys! :D
I have another question =\
If
, find the value of a
note:the answer needs to be given in the approximate form, and you can only enter
and
into the calculator.
-
change of base law
 = 3 - (\frac{log_{10}{14}}{log_{10}{6}}))
 = 1.52711)
})
})

-
thanks toothpick you legend.
-
if you multiplied by two on both sides:

then take log2 on both sides

log_2 3 )

:D didnt even touch rational functions :D
That's not 100% simplifed. There's still x'es on both sides.
-
pssst here u go:
 x = 1+log_2 3)

kk? :P
or
-
pssst here u go:
 x = 1+log_2 3)

kk? :P
or 
:P
-
But really, Mao has some careless arithmetical errors, which should actually give:
-
oh gar.... i dont know how to divide two by three... :(
if you multiplied by two on both sides:

then take log2 on both sides

log_2 3 )

 x = 1+log_2 3)





LOL at myself...
-
Can anyone else spot any errors in Mao's working? lol
-
Can anyone else spot any errors in Mao's working? lol
bah it's right this time k???!
:'(
-
Ok I have no idea how to work this kind of question out without using a calculator:
b) find the points of intersection of the graphs y=f(x) and y=f -1(x)
and I worked out the inverse to be
-
find the intersection with line y=x i think
-
how do i do that?
do I sketch them both?
=_=
-
maybe. but if you're not supposed to use a calculator, then your going to have to solve it by hand.
-
Yeah...
It doesn't say I can't use a calculator, but I want to know how to solve it without one, if there is a way
-
i have no clue. i can't seem to manipulate the algebra to get x by itself. sorry
-
No, you let
 = f^{-1}(x) )
i.e
-
I don't think you can solve
analytically. You could use Newton's method to approximate the solutions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_Method) however that is time-consuming and messy.
-
wouldn't that be easier than letting it equal the inverse?
-
Intersecting any of the two with
is the best way to go about it. The inverses of each other intersect if they intersect with their axis of symmetry, which is
. You don't need to find the inverse this way!
However, you will need a calculator to solve it explicitly.
-
And not in the Methods course.
-
solving in y=x is generally accepted, but sometimes there can be multiple (or infinite) solutions, such as a symmetry of y=x already exists:
(a quater circle)
which the reverse is itself... (infinite solutions)
-
And not in the Methods course.
Knowing the axis of symmetry of inverses is in the Methods course. If you're referring to Newton's method, then yeah, you're right.
-
ah fair go, calculator it is then O_O.
thanks all of you.
-
And not in the Methods course.
Knowing the axis of symmetry of inverses is in the Methods course. If you're referring to Newton's method, then yeah, you're right.
Yeah I was referring to the Newton's method, just that you guys dived in with posts whilst I was writing that.
-
if
find the value for y.
-
y= ex^2
-
how did you work that out? O_O
-

from the log laws:


-
If
, then y is equal to?
-
by the same token
-log_{10}(2x)^3=log_{10}10 - log_{10}y)
^3} = log_{10}\frac{10}{y})
^3}=\frac{10}{y})
-
the inverse of function
is
-
the inverse of function
is

 = y+2)


 = 3x+2)
-

now it will be a lot easier :D
-
 = \dfrac{(x - 3) + 5}{x - 3} = 1 + \dfrac{5}{x-3})
Swapping the x & y coordinates:

)

-
ahh are those answers the same? O_O
-
 = \frac{3x+2}{x-1} = \frac{3(x-1) + 5}{x-1} = 3 + \frac{5}{x-1})
Yes (the proof is above: going from unknown's answer to dcc's answer) :)
-
ohh thanks alot everyone!
-
an extremely easy question.
Find
of 
I don't understand the
part.
-
an extremely easy question.
Find
of 
I don't understand the
part.
Basically they are just limiting the domain for you, in effect simplifying the equation, since you cannot divide anything by zero. Since they let
, then
, so you will not be dividing by zero. This means that you can just divide the whole thing to make
which should be a lot simpler.
-
You know, I've never thought about the
in that way before. I would've had just ran straight to the quotient rule.
-
That explains why I got that question wrong :P, thanks a lot neobeo.
-
in a question such as the one above, how do you prove that
?
-
in a question such as the one above, how do you prove that
?
You don't prove it. It is just a specified domain. It's just telling you, do this task for the domain
.
-

This is a division operation, and the absolute no-no is to divide something by 0
so
is undefined when 

is that what you wanted to know?
-
You know, I've never thought about the
in that way before. I would've had just ran straight to the quotient rule.
Yeah, using the quotient rule is not most efficient method to diff in this case.
-
yeah thanks mao that makes sense.
theres questions in the exercise book asking that =\
-
You know, I've never thought about the
in that way before. I would've had just ran straight to the quotient rule.
Yeah, using the quotient rule is not most efficient method to diff in this case.
is algebraicly equivalent to 
but you need to include that
in your final solution
using the quotient rule avoids having to attach this restraint, as the
denominator will imply that it is the case
however, just to be safe, always state the domain of wierd looking equations =D
another thing to be careful with is differentiability... that's a whole new can of worms :P
-
Yep, curves must be 'smooth' and continuous, IRRC.
I'm sure there's a more mathematical way of stating this.
-
Yep, curves must be 'smooth' and continuous, IRRC.
I'm sure there's a more mathematical way of stating this.
rofl thats exactly what my tutor told me.
-
for the function
, how do you find when
?
-
 = 6(x-1))
-
omg that was such a stupid question rofl.
this one i dont know what to do with either
Given that the curve
has a gradient of -5 at the point (2,-2), find the value of a and b
-

At the point (2, -2), the gradient is -5. In other words, when
, 
 -\frac{b}{2^2} \implies -5 = 4a - \frac{b}{4}\mbox{ ------<br />(1)})
Now, to get another equation (trying to set up simultaneous equations):
The point (2, -2) on the curve tells us that when
, 
^2 + \frac{b}{2} \implies -2 = 4a + \frac{b}{2}\mbox{ ------<br />(2)})
Subtracting (1) from (2) yields:

Therefore,
-
Subtracting (1) from (2) yields:

Therefore, 



Thus,
-
Hey guys, I'm back again :P
I seem to be able to do these problems half way but then don't know where to go afterwards.
'Find the derivative of
with respect to x using the product rule.'
I get up to
but then they seem to simplify the answer quite a bit.
The answer they get is
, how do they get to this?
Is my working out completely wrong? lol
-
'Find the derivative of
with respect to x using the product rule.'
"Let ^2 )
Therefore
)
Putting this all together gives
^2 + 4x^2.2.4x(2x^2+1))
^2 +32x^3(2x^2+1))
Factor out 
^2 +4x^2(2x^2+1))
Factor out ^2)
(2x^2+1+4x^2))
(6x^2+1))
-
mm thanks ed
-
I have a questionnn........................................
Find the derivative of ^2)
and also of
-
They both use the chain rule
e.g The first one:
^{2})
When you find out the derivative of v, you use the chain rule
 )
And then you apply for the formula.
It's a similar technique for the second one.
If you can't solve it, I'll work out the solution tomorrow, when I'm a bit more awake.
-
For the second one:
and ^{1/2})
and
(chain rule)
Apply product rule:

Get a common denominator:
+1}{2e^{4x}\sqrt{x+1}}\\<br />&=\frac{-8x-7}{2e^{4x}\sqrt{x+1}}\\<br /><br />\end{align*})
-
ahh thanks alot both of you.
x
-
I have forgotten how to derive after two weeks w/o maths :S.
, show that
and specify when
-
I have forgotten how to derive after two weeks w/o maths :S.
, show that
and specify when \geq0)
last thing before bed :) [hey polky :P ]
differentiation [by product rule]:
=\frac{1}{8}\cdot \left( 3(x-1)^2(8-3x)+(-3)(x-1)^3\right)=\frac{1}{8}[-3(x-1)+3(8-3x)](x-1)^2=\frac{3}{8}(9-4x)(x-1)^2)
when
, it implies that the function will be "positive"
looking at
, we can see three parts:
which is constant
always positive
, which is a square 
, the only terms that changes sign. therefore, when this part is greater than (or equals to 0), the derivative will be positive (or 0)
-
hah thanks mao.
-
Find the two positive numbers whose sum is 4 and such that the sum of the cube of the first and the square of the second is as small as possible.
The bolded part of the question is what's confusing me, what the hell do you equate these two numbers to if you don't know what 'as small as possible' would be?
-
Let the two positive numbers by x and y.

You want to minimise
. Let
(just label what u wanna minimize)
Now, from the first equation, you have 
^2)
Now, find
and find the nature of
's stationary points ;)
-
oh :S thanks.
lol i feel stupid after that one XD
-
"Find the point on the parabola
that is closest to the point
"
:S what the fuck do you do with this..? tangents?
-
I havent looked at the question in detail yet, but my hunch is that it involved the distance formula for some reason.
-
but (3,0) isn't a point on the graph. it's just a point. lol
-
"Find the point on the parabola
that is closest to the point
"
:S what the fuck do you do with this..? tangents?
Let
be the points that are closest to
.
As Glockmeister said we need to use the distance formula. The distance between those two points are:
^2+(y-0)^2})
Since we know
we can sub this in:
^2+(x^2)^2})
^2+x^4})
We need to find when the distance is minimal, i.e. when
. We can also just ignore the square root as we are going to make
(since if we derive
then
)


We need to factorise this to find solutions. Let
, then:
=4(1)^3+2(1)-6=0)
Hence
.
We also need to ensure that this stationary point is a minimum. Find a point before and after
and substitute into
to verify the nature.
=-6)
=30)
Drawing a gradient table: \ _ / hence minimum. (Also by
therefore minimum).
Substitute
into
:

Therefore the point closest to
on the parabola
is
.
-
hah thanks, thats good.
-
The surface area of a cube is changing at the rate of 8cm2/s. How fast is the volume changing when the surface area is 60cm?
-
Let A be surface area (
), V be volume (
), t be time (s).
You have 
You need 

To find
,
^3 = \left(\frac{A}{6}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}})


When 

the volume is increasing at a rate of
-
perfect, thanks a lot man.
-
A vessel has such a shape that when the depth of the water in it is x cm, the volume is given by the equation
. Water is poured in at a constant rate of
. At what rate is the water rising when the depth is 8cm?
-
We are looking for (I assume you mean 30cm^3/s)
This is an application of the chain rule to relate to different rates.
This step basically differentiates your Volume formula with respect to x.
Notice how the conjugate of dV/dx is used, because we require dx/dV.
When
:
-
Ah thanks.
This question confused me, i didn't know exactly what rate of change I was looking for XD.
This helped.
-
When you encounter these kind of related rates questions (there usually isn't too much variety in our textbooks), begin by writing what I call the KING EQUATION.
That is, set out exactly what rate they're looking for (whether its the change in height or the change in radius or etc; its almost always with respect to time), and write down the rate they give you (also with respect to time) and try to "fill in" the missing relation, based on the chain rule.
Then you should set out to find that missing relation, and throughout the process, keep referring to your KING EQUATION at the top to make sure you're on the right track.
-
, Find
-
Using the product rule:
(As my methods teacher says: diff the first one, leave the second one alone, then diff the second one, and leave the first one alone)

(we know e^x cannot equal 0)
<0)
-
ah thanks heaps! your explanations are really easy to follow (Y).
-
gah, is it possible to find the equation of an asymptote, say for
without graphing it?
-
Take limits as
. It's an intuitive kind of thing, you need to predict how parts of the function will behave with large numbers.
As
,
becomes negligibly small, so
.
As
, both
and
become very pronounced, and you can't really neglect either one, so there is no asymptote as
.
So the only asymptote is 
As another example,
(x+3)}=\frac{8}{x+3}+\frac{1}{x-1}+x-2)
As
, the x in the denominator of the fractions will be so big that they practically disappear, leaving the asymptote
.
-
O_O I don't get it... lol.
Guess i'll just stick with graphing it then >.<, thanks anyway man.
-
Given that
, find the approximate change in y as x increases from -2 to -1.97
and also
"A manufacturing company has a daily output y on day t of a production run given by
. Find the instantaneous rate of change of output y with respect to t on the 10th day."
I'm so fucked for this SAC >.<.
-
Mmm, I hate approximation questions.
The best formula for this scenario is 
Considering the values given, this imples:
\times\Delta x)
-4\right)\times 0.03)

The other question:
Differentiate 



-
ah thanks a lot man
-
, find an approximation for f(h) where h is small in terms of h and a.
and I have another question, when the hell do we use the formula
??
:S
-
, find an approximation for f(h) where h is small in terms of h and a.
and I have another question, when the hell do we use the formula
??
:S
answered your own question :P
=f(0+h)\approx f(0)+h\cdot f'(0))
-
wow wtf lol. thanks.
-
, Find the tangent at the given point.
-
The tangent is always a straight line in the form

To find
, the gradient, we must differentiate
and find the instantaneous rate of change at the given point.



To find
, we can substitute in the ordered pair at that point:
=0)
)
+c\Rightarrow c=0)
Therefore, the tangent is:
-
ah thanks a tonne =]
-
Find
for which
is divisible by
but not
.
-
Basically (because it's late)
You let the function P(2)=0 i.e let x=2, and the equation equal zero.
Then you let P(1)=0 and then reject the solution of the P(2)=0 that matches the solution in P(1)=0
-
oh, never thought of that.. thanks alot man =]
-
Someone asked a similar question a few months before actually, I just couldn't find the post.
-
Prove that
is divisible by
for all values of k.
How would you show this :s.
-
Prove that
is divisible by
for all values of k.
How would you show this :s.
try subbing in
:)
-
:uglystupid2: I solved it incorrectly when I did it myself :s.
-
-1(k-9)-7 = 0 )



epic phail
-
lol i wrote it incorrectly.
it's (k-1)
epic fail to me.
-
lol i wrote it incorrectly.
it's (k-1)
epic fail to me.
in that case
-1(k-9)-7 = 0 )




k's will cancel out hence the value k is negligible
-
yeah i worked it out after realising it was k-1.
thanks anyway lol.
-
yeah i worked it out after realising it was k-1.
thanks anyway lol.
lol np im bored so yer xD
-
The curve for
is such that the tangent at
passes through the origin. find the gradient of the tangent and hence determine:
a. The value of K
b. The equation of the curve.
-
the equation of a tangent is given by the generic equation
)
at 
+e^2)
since it passes through the origin, (0,0), substituting:


antidifferentiating gives
-
The equation you have there is the gradient equation for a particular curve, y. With this particular curve, we are told that at
, its tangent will intercept the origin. So:


Now, since we know that 
)
...
Mao! Stop beating me to things. :(
-
thankyou my darlings.
-

help :P
-

help :P

= dx)
= dx)
= dx)
= 
=  ])
= 
= 
-
thanksssssss
-
You can anti-differentiate term by term (like differentiation)
How do you integrate
? Or
for that matter? Then,
.
-
continuee....i got THAT far :P
eulers constant confuses me >.<
done :)
-

help :P

= dx)
= dx)
= dx)
= 
=  ])
= 
= 
you could've done it using hyperbolic functions with MUEP/UMEP knowledge :P
-
(7-x) dx)
:buck2:
-
(7-x) dx)
:buck2:
(7-x) dx)
= dx)
=
=]-[\frac{-(-2)^3}{3}+\frac{5(-2)}{2}+14(-2)])
=
-
ahh i see, so the only way to solve this is to expand the polynomial?
-
ahh i see, so the only way to solve this is to expand the polynomial?
you *could* use linear substitution, but that's beyond the scope of the methods course, and that use of this method for this particularly simple case would be superfluous
the easiest way is to expand the polynomial.
-
That's one way to do it, but there are surely others, a relatively fast way I thought of for the curious:
(7-x)\, dx )
Make the substitution, u = x + 2)
\, du = 81 \cdot 9 B(2,2) = 81\cdot 9 \frac{(\Gamma(2))^2}{\Gamma(4)} = \frac{243}{2})
Where B(m,n) is the Beta function
-
That's one way to do it, but there are surely others, a relatively fast way I thought of for the curious:
(7-x)\, dx )
Make the substitution, u = x + 2)
\, du = 81 \cdot 9 B(2,2) = 81\cdot 9 \frac{(\Gamma(2))^2}{\Gamma(4)} = \frac{243}{2})
Where B(m,n) is the Beta function
Most wouldn't consider it necessary to use the Beta function to integrate a polynomial :P But then again you are Ahmad :P
-
lol wtffff ahmad!!!
i think ill just expand then :p
-
the line with equation
is a tangent to the curve with equation
. What is the value of c?
-
The line
has gradient 4, so you want to find where
has gradient 4.


^2-(\frac{5}{2})-5=-\frac{5}{4})
So the coordinates of the tangent point are
, so
+c)
-
love you.
-
water is draining from a cone-shaped funnel at a rate of 500cm3/min. The cone has base radius of 20cm and a height of 100cm. let h be the depth of water in the funnel at the time t minutes. the rate of decrease of h in cm/min is given by..?
-

we want a relationship between h and V, i.e. volume of a cone:

by similar triangles, we find that 




-
The probability of a target shooter hitting the bullseye on any one shot is 0.2
What is the smallest number of shots the shooter should make to ensure a probability of more than 0.95 of hitting the bullseye at least once?
In the previous parts of the question I found that
and hence
-
The probability of a target shooter hitting the bullseye on any one shot is 0.2
What is the smallest number of shots the shooter should make to ensure a probability of more than 0.95 of hitting the bullseye at least once?
>0.95)
>0.95)
(note the sign change)
Let n be the number of shots the shooter should make.
Now to solve
, use your graphics calculator and enter
. Go into TBLSET and make TblStart=0. Now go into TABLE and scroll down until you find the first value where Y1 is less than 0.05. It should end up being 0.04398, to which the corresponding X value is 14.
i.e. the smallest number of shots the shooter should make to ensure a probability of more than 0.95 at least once is 14.
-
good as!!! =]
thanks man, seriously, essential maths is shit at explanations.
-
Hey, with the previous question, what if it asked something like; ensure a probability of more than 0.95 of hitting the bullseye exactly twice?
-
>0.95,\; \implies \binom{n}{2}\cdot (0.2)^2\cdot (0.8)^{n-2}>0.95,\; n\ge 2)
then you'd put into the y editor
and look through the table to see where it gets greater than 0.95.
for this case, however, the maximum probability of hitting the bullseye twice is 0.302 at 9 or 10 trials. hence the probability fo hitting the bullseye twice is NEVER greater than 0.95 (or 1/3 to be more realistic)
-
cheers.
-
The length of time, X(minutes), between the arrival of customers at an autobank has a random variable with probability density function:
 = \left\{ <br />\begin{array}{cc}<br />\frac{1}{5}e^{-\frac{x}{5}} & x\geq0 \\<br />0 & x<0 \\<br />\end{array}<br />)
Find the probability that more than 12mins elapses between successive customers given that more than 8 minutes has passed.
I translated the question into:
Find )
is that right?
if so how do I solve it now? :P I found that =0.202)
These questions that include 'given' always fuck me up :S
-
Since the intersection of
and
is
, then the formula for conditional probability becomes:
 = \frac{\mbox{P}(X>12)}{\mbox{P}(X>8)})
-
how did you find that as the intersection? :|
-
=\frac{Pr(A\cup B)}{Pr(B)})
to find the conditional probability, it's the probability of BOTH events occuring, divided by the probability of the condition
i.e. in this case, X has to be >12 as well as >8, which simplifies to X>12 (because 12>8)
hence, =\frac{Pr(X>12)}{Pr(X>8)}=\frac{\int_{12}^{\infty}f(x)\; dx}{\int_8^{\infty}f(x)\; dx})
for the purpose of methods, if you are using an 84 or older calculator, use a very large number in place of infinity, such as 99999. This will give a fairly accurate answer, as f(x) gets quite small as it approaches to infinity. if you are using 89 or later, you are blessed with the "inifinity" key.
how to analytically evaluate those two integrals are covered in the first year course at uni =]
-
think of a number line:
--------|8----|12--------->
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (x>8)
xxxxxxxxxxxxx (x>12)
the intersection of the two is fairly obvious: x>12
-
how to analytically evaluate those two integrals are covered in the first year course at uni =]
What? You can get an exact value with Methods techniques:
-
thanks both of you!
and thank god i have an 89 =]
and wow :S
-
What? You can get an exact value with Methods techniques:

I think he's referring to 'subbing in' the infinities, which normally can't be done, but I think we're meant to know how to do that in methods with an integral like that, since it's e to a negative power, and when you sub in infinity, it just becomes zero (well..approaches).
-
=\frac{\int_{12}^{\infty}\frac{1}{5}e^{-x/5}\; dx}{\int_8^{\infty}\frac{1}{5}e^{-x/5}\; dx})
}{\lim_{t\to \infty}\left( \int_{8}^te^{-x/5}\; dx\right)})
}{\lim_{t\to \infty}\left( \left[-5e^{-x/5}\right]_{8}^t\right)})
-
 = \left\{ <br />\begin{array}{cc}<br />Ay & 0\leq y \leq B \\<br />0 & otherwise \\<br />\end{array}<br />)
find A and B if
-
Two unknowns: A and B
Two pieces of information:
1. The probability density function has a total area of 1
2. The mean is 12
Hence, you can solve this. Write out statements 1 and 2 in mathematical speak -- evaluating integrals and simplifying, and then use simultaneous equations (if necessary) to find A or B, then substitute it into the other equation to find the other constant.
-
1.


2. 

Dividing equation (2) by equation (1) yields:


-
I might just splice in how number two was derived:
Remember that the expected value of a probability density function (pdf) is
.
Because we are bound by the pdf:
, we have to restrict our domain. We also know that expected value (mean) is 12.
\, \operatorname{d}y )
For
, using
:



And then you reach coblin's step 2.
-
yeah, thanks both of you for your help in that last question.
Now I have NO idea how to approach this one:
 = \left\{ <br />\begin{array}{cc}<br />k(a^2-x^2) & -a \leq x\leq a \\<br />0 & otherwise \\<br />\end{array}<br />)
b. Find the value of a which gives the standard deviation of 2.
In part a. of the question it made me find that 
-
} = \sigma^2 = \mbox{E[}X^2\mbox{]} - \left[\mbox{E(}X\mbox{)}\right]^2)
\;dx = k\left[\frac{a^2x^3}{3} - \frac{x^5}{5}\right]^a_{-a})
\right])

and
\;dx = k\left[\frac{a^2x^2}{2} - \frac{x^4}{4}\right]^a_{-a})
\right])

Therefore:
(Substituting
in)
Also, } = \sigma^2 = (2)^2 = 4)
So: 


From the domain, since 
Hence:
-
thanks heaps =]
-
mmm.
how do you find the standard deviation of a normal distribution curve by just looking at it?? :S
i know the mean where the maximum occurs...
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y289/Taksi_/usd-1.jpg)
-
I guess roughly the 99.7% range is from 120 to 150 in the first one (coz that's where the curve practically touches the x-axis -- it doesn't but it looks like it), so hence 3 standard deviations from the mean is
, and hence the standard deviation is 5.
You'd never get anything like this on the exam though, haha.
-
ah cool.
thanks man =]
-
in normal distrubution; are the probabilities
and
going to be the same, if the mean and the standard deviation are the same?
-
Yeh they are, since
=Pr(X<2)+\int_{2}^{2}f(x)dx)
+0)
)
-
thanks a lot man =]
-
Say that I have a normal distribution function with mean 40 and standard deviation 5.
If I want to find c for
, I go into the stat/list editor, inverse>normals and type in the mean sd and the area 0.75. What do I do if I want to find
?
-
=0.75)
=0.75)
=0.25)
and then just do what u've been doing all along as usual =T
edit: oh, and to know that symmetry property, just draw yourself a graph of a normal distribution and its quite easy to work out why its the case, as well as working out some of the harder symmetry properties such as how to interpret Pr(a<Z<b) etc.
-
thanks a shitload man!
good explanations :)
-
"The weight if cats is normally distributed. It is known that 10% of cats weigh more than 1.8kg and 15% of cats weigh less than 1.35kg. Find the mean and the standard deviation."
-
 = 0.10)
 = 0.15)
Hint (and this is how I analyse the question):
A normal distribution (like the binomial distribution) is always defined by two parameters. Here, you have two pieces of information, so you should be able to find the two unknowns. The question is, how do I get these two expressions into a form that involves the mean and the standard deviation?
Try using this:

So you will get:
 = 0.10 \implies \mbox{Pr}\left(Z < \frac{1.8 - \mu}{\sigma}\right) = 0.90)
 = 0.15)
Use invNorm(:
= invNorm(k), where  = k)
Hence,
invNorm(0.90) =
(1)
invNorm(0.15) =
(2)
(1) - (2) yields:


-
hmm you're right but I'm confused :P. what is invNorm?
When I do inverse normals I use a program where I have to enter the area(probability), the standard deviation and the mean. :S
edit**
I worked it out =]. Thanks a lot Coblin.
-
 = 0.10)
 = 0.15)
Hint (and this is how I analyse the question):
A normal distribution (like the binomial distribution) is always defined by two parameters. Here, you have two pieces of information, so you should be able to find the two unknowns. The question is, how do I get these two expressions into a form that involves the mean and the standard deviation?
Try using this:

So you will get:
 = 0.10 \implies \mbox{Pr}\left(Z < \frac{1.8 - \mu}{\sigma}\right) = 0.90)
 = 0.15)
Use invNorm(:
= invNorm(k), where  = k)
Hence,
invNorm(0.90) =
(1)
invNorm(0.15) =
(2)
(1) - (2) yields:



coblin: 
-
coblin: 
Thanks, typo. :)
Only the formula needs to be fixed.
-
When do you use capitals and when don't you?
You see in the Essential Meth book it gives
instead of
.
Also do you think any examiners will be pedantic enough penalise us for this?
-
When do you use capitals and when don't you?
You see in the Essential Meth book it gives
instead of
.
Also do you think any examiners will be pedantic enough penalise us for this?
They won't be pedantic enough.
I think you should always use capitals. The convention is that capital letters denote random variables. "Z" and "X" are both random variables.
-
Thanks coblin... hmm, so the small letters actually stand for certain numbers and the large ones can stand for a set of numbers, that's alright... except, we don't write normal equations like
. Oh well I guess I'm the one being pedantic now...
-
The larger ones refer to a variable that has uncertainity, yeah. I don't think it's capital for the same reason "R" (set of real numbers) is capital.
-
Basically, as coblin said, lower case numbers represent deterministic (non-random) variables whereas upper case represent stochastic (random) variables. It's just a notation thing, really.
You may come across this notation at some point in discrete probability:
-
except, we don't write normal equations like
. Oh well I guess I'm the one being pedantic now...
We can. For example, if you want to find the expected profit, and you know profit is a function of
, but
is a random variable, then you can write:
, and it might be
for example.
I think one reason why they have the lowercase formula is because if you have something like:
, you can only change
to
by using the same manipulations on the RHS as well, hence making 
For example,
 = \mbox{Pr}\left(\frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} = \frac{0.5 - \mu}{\sigma}\right) = \mbox{Pr}\left(Z = \frac{0.5 - \mu}{\sigma}\right))
Recognise that: 
In Methods, we are often using the lowercase formula, but fundamentally, we're using the uppercase formula, which you have to apply to both the LHS and the RHS. I hope you understand the subtle difference, but you really don't need to - most people only superficially understand this (merely changing the
to a
and then using the lowercase formula on the RHS).
-
umm i think u should re-check that question about finding the x intercept of y= 2/ (x-3)^3 + 4
u should get :
-1/2 = (x-3)^3
(-1/2) ^ (1/3) = (x-3)
(-1/2) ^ (1/3) +3 = x
to prove that this is correct, please check on a CAS calculator.
-
Yeh, he did get it wrong, but thing is that question was from 7 months ago O_O coblin just forgot the negative (its the one on page one if every1 else is wondering)
-
For
calculate the possible values of k that the tangents at the points with x-coords 1 and
respectively are perpendicular.
-
For
calculate the possible values of k that the tangents at the points with x-coords 1 and
respectively are perpendicular.

So the gradients of the two tangents can be found if we sub in 1 and
into
. When we multiply them together they should equal -1, since they are perpendicular.


Now sub in
:


These two are perpendicular, so:
(1-k)=-1)


=0)
So
or
-
u used the wrong symbol
its [/tex] not [\tex]
-
u used the wrong symbol
its [/tex] not [\tex]
ah good pick up chath, I wrote \frac so many times I was used to \, lol
-
u used the wrong symbol
its [/tex] not [\tex]
ah good pick up chath, I wrote \frac so many times I was used to \, lol
haha xD
-
cheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeers
-
fdshfksdhfsdjl
Factorise:
^2)
AND ALSO

-
^2 = (a+b)(a-b) - (a-b)(a-b) = (a+b - (a-b))(a-b) = 2b(a-b))
-
from the 2007** exam 2:
the simultaneous equations
and
have a unique solution for:
answer is m: R\{-6,6}
i didnt understand what they were saying in the assessment report :S
edit**
-
I know this isn't really helping but which question in 2007 Exam 2? I can't seem to find it. I'd like to have a look at what I did as I've done this exam. Interesting question raised, bucket. :)
-
from the 2008 exam 2:
the simultaneous equations
and
have a unique solution for:
answer is m: R\{-6,6}
i didnt understand what they were saying in the assessment report :S
If
then clearly
is the unique solution. So assume that
.
Then we multiply the first expression by
and the second by
such that the simultaneous equations read
and
. Subtracting the former from the latter, we find that
.
Now if
then this is saying that
, which is impossible. Thus there cannot be a solution if
.
If
, then we can divide through by
to find that
, which we can then substitute back into the original equation to find the corresponding
-coordinate
. This is the unique solution for
.
Graphically, the reason why the simultaneous equations don't have a solution when
is because the lines are parallel at that point: substituting these values of
back into the original equations and making
the subject yields the pairs of equations
and
, which, as they have different
-intercepts, are clearly parallel.
On this thought, you could really just rearrange them to be the equations of lines. If
then clearly
is the unique solution. So assume that
. Then the original equations can be rearranged to read
and
. These have the same gradient when
, which is the same as when
. In this case, however, they have different
-intercepts, and so are clearly parallel, and in Euclidean geometry, parallel lines never intersect, so there is no solution. If, on the other hand,
, then the lines aren't parallel. As straight non-parallel lines intersect exactly once in Euclidean geometry, it follows that there exists a unique solution given by the coordinates of the point of intersection.
-
Wow. Very well explained humphdogg, thanks a lot :).
I know this isn't really helping but which question in 2007 Exam 2? I can't seem to find it. I'd like to have a look at what I did as I've done this exam. Interesting question raised, bucket. :)
This was question 5 in the multiple choice... seems a bit much for a multi choice question. :S but I guess people who understand the theory well would pick it up quickly by elimination.
-
This was question 5 in the multiple choice... seems a bit much for a multi choice question. :S but I guess people who understand the theory well would pick it up quickly by elimination.
VCAA 2007 Exam 2? Because Q5 of multiple choice is an antidifferentiation question.
-
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/mathematics/cas/pastexams/2007/2007mmCAS2.pdf
-
Oh! I do non-CAS hehe. Thanks for clearing things up.
-
This is from 2007 exam 1. =\
is a point on the line
such that the length of
, the line segment from the origin
to
, is a minimum. Find the coordinates of
and this minimum length.
-
This is what I did. Sorry if this doesn't exactly make sense.
You want the line that is perpendicular to the point P. (Shortest distance).

This is the gradient of the tangent.
is the gradient of the normal. (This is what we want as this crosses P).
Using
and substituting
(origin) we find that the equation of the normal is 
Now just make
You can find
from solving the above then sub into either equation to find
coordinate.
Then using
(distance formula), you can find the distance between O and P.
Hope I was able to help. :)
-
ah, thanks a lot man =]
-
Another approach:

Therefore the distance of the line from the origin at any
is the distance between the points:
and )
Let
be this distance:
^2 + (10-2x)^2 } )

})
}{2\sqrt{5 (x^2 - 8x + 20)}})
I know the stationary point will be a minimum, because the original function is the square root of a parabola with a local minimum. Since the square root function is monotonic increasing (1 to 1, and always has a positive gradient), I can conclude that the original function,
, will have a local minimum too.
Minimum occurs at: 
Therefore, minimum distance:
and,
Coordinates of
:
-
Another approach: ...
Ah nice approach Coblin. My mind isn't as flexible.
I'll keep that method hot in my mind. Might come in useful some time.
-
Another approach: ...
Ah nice approach Coblin. My mind isn't as flexible.
I'll keep that method hot in my mind. Might come in useful some time.
Your method is more clever, IMO.
I presented my method because it's the "hack method" approach. You don't need to have a good grasp of geometry to do it this way. ;)
-
This is from 2007 exam 1. =\
is a point on the line
such that the length of
, the line segment from the origin
to
, is a minimum. Find the coordinates of
and this minimum length.
goddamit I remember this question.. But I added the distance up wrong and got
.. so frustrating haha, I knew as soon as I came out of the exam as well..
/random
-
This is from 2007 exam 1. =\
is a point on the line
such that the length of
, the line segment from the origin
to
, is a minimum. Find the coordinates of
and this minimum length.
Another take on dekoyl's idea of perpendicular lines:
(this is mainly for specialist students, and is quite useful when solving vector questions in specialist)
define
. This vector defines the line from the origin to a point P on the line [yex]y = 10 - 2x[/tex].
also, we find:
is the vector of the tangent of the curve
at point P.
We wish to find the situation where the line
and the curve are normals to each other (i.e, they are perpendicular)
Sowe wish to find when
(remembering our dot product identities)
\left(1\right) + \left(10 - 2x\right)\left(-2\right)= 0 \ \therefore\ x = 4)
so
is the minimum distance of the line OP and P has the coordinates
.
-
Ok, so my methods teacher kind of didn't bother to teach our class anything about 'general solutions of circular function equations' and since one of those questions popped up in the MAV 2008 exam I though I'd try to teach them to myself...having a tiiiinnyyy bit of difficulty with some questions though.
1. The general solution for an equation is
Find the solutions for the interval 
nevermind...
2. Find the general solution for
and use this to find the solutions for the interval 
dw about this one anymore :P
thanks glockmeister
-
Solved on IRC
-
Sorry could you post the solution here, Glockmeister (doesn't have to be LaTeX)? Thanks.
I'm not on IRC so missed it:(
-
Sure
1. The general solution for an equation is
Find the solutions for the interval 
The one thing about general solutions is that it is an equation that gives us the answers for a trig function where the domain is
. But here, we want a range of answers within a restricted domain. First step however, is to change that sin inverse
^n \cdot sin^{-1}(\frac{1}{2}) n \in \mathsbb{Z})
^n \cdot \frac{\pi}{6}) n \in \mathsbb{Z})
N is an interger so what we do is to let n = a series whole numbers. The answers that you get can not go beyond the domain
. If you were to do the sums, you would find that n = -1, 0 , 1. Put those numbers in and you should get 
2 Find the general solution for
and use this to find the solutions for the interval 
=\sqrt{2})
=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}})
= 2k\pi \pm \frac{\pi}{4} k \in \mathsbb{Z})


And then you would od the same thing as 1, subsitute integers which give an answer that fit the domain
-
^ Thank you, good sir. I don't recall seeing a question like this so it's a great help. :)
-
actually, with the second one, the general form is:
 )
So when you get  = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2})
the next step would be ]= 2n\pi \pm \frac{\pi}{4})
then you get x on its own:
and then you proceed to sub in
and you get the answers 
apparently this is only in the CAS course (which Glock didn't do :S)
-
Yeah, that would be right... I was thinking I did something wrong when I was asleep last night, that x value felt so wrong.
-
How do you manually integrate equations which have like, two types of functions?
ie.
or
?
Mm, I can't seem to find any instructions on how to this in my textbook, it just says to use the calculator :S
Are we even required to know how to do this manually?
-
How do you manually integrate equations which have like, two types of functions?
ie.
or
?
Mm, I can't seem to find any instructions on how to this in my textbook, it just says to use the calculator :S
Are we even required to know how to do this manually?
Simply, no. However, you may be required to integrate it if it's part of a "hence" question.
-
For integrating I would not thing that you would need to know how to do that (If I remember right, this is integration by parts, which isn't even in the spech course)
Of course if this is part of a 'differenitate this, hence find the integral of that' question, then you know they steps required for this technique
-
Find the derivative of
and
, and hence find  \, dx)
The question should tell you what derivatives you've gotta find. Have a go at that... it should work (I think).
No clue how to do the second one, haha.
-
I dont even know how to do that lol
-
\right] = 2e^{2x}\cos(3x) - 3e^{2x}\sin(3x))
\right] = 2e^{2x}\sin(3x) + 3e^{2x}\cos(3x))
Integrating both sides of these two results:
 + C_1= 2 \int e^{2x}\cos(3x) \, dx - 3 \int e^{2x}\sin(3x) \, dx)
 + C_2 = 2 \int e^{2x}\sin(3x) \, dx + 3 \int e^{2x}\cos(3x) \, dx)
Subtracting 3 times the top equation from 2 times the bottom equation to eliminate
yields:
 - 3e^{2x}\cos(3x) + 2C_2 - 3C_1 = 4 \int e^{2x}\sin(3x) \, dx + 9 \int e^{2x}\sin(3x) \, dx)
 - 3e^{2x}\cos(3x) + 2C_2 - 3C_1 = 13 \int e^{2x}\sin(3x) \, dx)
, where )
It's unlikely you'll get that though.
It's much more likely you'll get something like this:
Find the derivative of
and hence find 
Solution
 = e^x + xe^x)
Integrating both sides:


-
Find the derivative of
and
, and hence find  \, dx)
The question should tell you what derivatives you've gotta find. Have a go at that... it should work (I think).
Hmmm I'm going around in circles with this one.
I come up with either:
.dx = e^{2x}sin(3x) - \int 3e^{2x}cos(3x).dx + c)
or
.dx = e^{2x}cos(3x) - \int 2e^{2x}cos(3x).dx +c )
Just thought I'd attempt it. Haven't done Maths for a while :(
Ah solving simultaneously. I didn't see that :(
-
No clue how to do the second one, haha.
I know how to do that
))
),x) into CAS calculator)
),dx )
Therefore answer is ),dx )
Hmm... even the CAS calculator can't do it. Must bring out the big guns. Ahmad, Neobeo, where are ya?
-
ahhhh thanks a heap!
edit* lol at that glockmeister!!
I made that question up btw, I think i might have seen it the other way around, ie.
-
that
screams of "NON ELEMENTARY"
even taylor expansion will have terribly short radius of convergence [it has quite a few asymptotes, too many for my liking in fact]
that means you don't worry about it :)
is doable, and quite a few other functions (usually products of two functions), via the method of integration by parts, it is the reverse chain rule which can be quite freaky, but in short it is not required by MM [not even at SM level].
-
Lol, thank god.
Anyway new question, bit fuzzy with inequalities :S.
"Find the set of values for x for which
"
-
First, consider the
part. We want to find the intersection of this with 


(x + 1) = 0)
or
First set of answers (look at the graph if you're not sure).
also intercepts near the stationary point of the graph at...
(I do this because we can flip it on the x-axis to get what we want later)
(x-2)=0)
or 
when
and
or 
Sorry if I made any mistakes but hope you got the gist of it.
Fruck 2:34am, need to memorise 80 Latin words and yet I'm still browsing VN. :(
-

in the first case, (x+1)\ge 0 \implies x\le -1\; \mbox{or} \; x\ge 6)
in the second case, (x-2)\le 0 \implies 2\le x\le 3)
hence, the solution is )
dekoyl: your "2>x<3" is a little stuffed :P
-
dekoyl: your "2>x<3" is a little stuffed :P
Ah thanks. :-[
You presented your answer in a much neater way *takes note*.
-
Mmm, I recently came across a binomial distribution problem in an exam 1 trial paper, and I realised I have no fucking idea how to evaluate them.
So, how would you evaluate something such as...say...
^2 \cdot(\frac{7}{10})^3)
This isn't from the actual question but I came up with an expression similar to this.
-
Well I assume your main problem is the

Basically;
!})



As for the two powers, just do it by hand I guess =\
-
yeah the ncr thing was what was fucking me up, thanks a lot man.
-
people often think of combinatorics in the difficult way.
this is my way of deciphering it:
10C5 = 10*9*8*7*6 / 1*2*3*4*5
i.e. counting down from 10, get 5 numbers. then counting up from 1, get 5 numbers.
the "n" controls where you start up the top, and the "r" controls how many numbers you count
so 20C3 = 20*19*18/1*2*3, 7C2 = 7*6/1*2
-
people often think of combinatorics in the difficult way.
this is my way of deciphering it:
10C5 = 10*9*8*7*6 / 1*2*3*4*5
i.e. counting down from 10, get 5 numbers. then counting up from 1, get 5 numbers.
the "n" controls where you start up the top, and the "r" controls how many numbers you count
so 20C3 = 20*19*18/1*2*3, 7C2 = 7*6/1*2
I was taught the same way last year but I've forgotten it. Thanks for bringing it up Mao.
-
Hey I was doing a trial exam and I got the answer
and when i looked up the answer it was corrext, but expressed as
. Do you think I would be marked incorrect if it were in the real exam? The question did not say "in simplest form".
-
Yeah, that seems acceptable.
-
Hey I was doing a trial exam and I got the answer
and when i looked up the answer it was corrext, but expressed as
. Do you think I would be marked incorrect if it were in the real exam? The question did not say "in simplest form".
I've heard from MAV that they do need the simplest surd, but not the simplest fraction
i.e.
is not acceptable, but
is...
-
meh, i never seem to remember to simplify surds :(
-
Mmm, whenever I do a trial exam I always fuck up when i need to manually plot a trig graph. Does anybody have any tricks for doing these? I have the most difficulty determining endpoints and the y intercept whenever the graph is translated in any direction.
-
Mmm, whenever I do a trial exam I always fuck up when i need to manually plot a trig graph. Does anybody have any tricks for doing these? I have the most difficulty determining endpoints and the y intercept whenever the graph is translated in any direction.
I find the intercepts and max/min values and then endpoints and go from there, but i agree i hate skecting those
-
they take up like 10 fucking minutes and then i end up getting them wrong anyway =_= lol
-
Mmm, whenever I do a trial exam I always fuck up when i need to manually plot a trig graph. Does anybody have any tricks for doing these? I have the most difficulty determining endpoints and the y intercept whenever the graph is translated in any direction.
I have troubles with the y-ints as well. I sometimes have trouble seeing if the maximum occurs on the right or left side of the y-axis.
-
Mmm, whenever I do a trial exam I always fuck up when i need to manually plot a trig graph. Does anybody have any tricks for doing these? I have the most difficulty determining endpoints and the y intercept whenever the graph is translated in any direction.
I think it gets easier when you split it up into different steps. For instance, I would normally do:
If
,
- I will lightly draw the lines y = d, y = d+a, y = d-a on the graph paper. This gives me boundaries which I cannot step over, as well as the middle.
- Then I solve f(x) = 0 for x, marking in the intercept points. (I generally find this the hardest part of graphing; not so much the solving, but more the scaling of the graph) A neat trick is if d = 0, then the solutions will be
away from each other. You can also work these out by applying transformations to your standard graph of
.
- Plug x in for endpoints and y-intercept, marking these points on the graph. (I would have thought this would be a simpler step o.O)
- Now it's a simple game of connect the dots. If you have done it right, everything should fall in place. If not, recheck your arithmetic. Check transformations regardless, just to be sure.
- If after everything it still doesn't look right, move on and come back to it later.
-
Thats a good approach to it. The problem I have with endpoints is when I get something such as
. I know it's probably very dumb but I don't know how to work these out when they are not the values I'm used to!!
-
Thats a good approach to it. The problem I have with endpoints is when I get something such as
. I know it's probably very dumb but I don't know how to work these out when they are not the values I'm used to!!
is in the second quadrant and cos is negative in that quadrant. So just convert it to first quadrant and you get
-
Thats a good approach to it. The problem I have with endpoints is when I get something such as
. I know it's probably very dumb but I don't know how to work these out when they are not the values I'm used to!!
is in the second quadrant and cos is negative in that quadrant. So just convert it to first quadrant and you get )
Another way is just to convert
into degrees
-
Mmm, whenever I do a trial exam I always fuck up when i need to manually plot a trig graph. Does anybody have any tricks for doing these? I have the most difficulty determining endpoints and the y intercept whenever the graph is translated in any direction.
draw the most basic function, then follow the steps of transformations.
normally, you only need to draw one quarter of the graph, as the functions are all periodic and perfectly symmetrical.
as for the table of exact values, remember this:
for 

and cos is the reverse of this order.
now just gotta remember how to use the unit circle and you have all the angles you need.
-
independent events vs mutually exclusive, whats the difference again and how do you find the probabilities of the intersection of these events.
-
If
and
are mutually exclusive, the probability of their intersection is zero.
 = 0)
If they are independent, then given one of them (conditional probability), the probability of the other is the same as the probability of the other alone. A consequence of this is that the probability of their intersection is the product of both the individual probabilities.
 = \mbox{Pr}(A))
Since  = \frac{\mbox{Pr}(A \cap B)}{\mbox{Pr}(B)})
 = \mbox{Pr}(A | B) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B) = \mbox{Pr}(A) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B))
-
Independent events (I'm assuming that's what you want because independent variables is a further/other sciences topic) are events where the probability of one event occuring does not affect the probability of another even occuring. The forumula is below
=\Pr(A)\Pr(B) \!\, )
Mutually exclusive events are events where one event can not occur alongside another event i.e
Thus the forumula is
-
thanks heaps guys
-
edit* I want to rephrase the question to be more general :P
How do I find
when A and B are independent? :S
-
add them?
-
So it's the same as the mutually exclusive events?
-
yeah, you would need to have
and
to be able to work out
-
In general:
 = \mbox{Pr}(A) + \mbox{Pr}(B) + \mbox{Pr}(A \cap B))
Since, for independent events:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B))
Then:
-
In general:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) + \mbox{Pr}(B) - \mbox{Pr}(A \cap B))
Since, for independent events:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B))
Then:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) + \mbox{Pr}(B) - \mbox{Pr}(A) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B))
corrected.
-
oh I see now, thanks... this type of probability always confuses me =_=
-
In general:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) + \mbox{Pr}(B) - \mbox{Pr}(A \cap B))
Since, for independent events:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B))
Then:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) + \mbox{Pr}(B) - \mbox{Pr}(A) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B))
corrected.
at least you're not deleting incorrect posts any more, and taking all the credit by editing one line of someone elses work, kinda a good thing your power is gone eh?
-
In general:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) + \mbox{Pr}(B) - \mbox{Pr}(A \cap B))
Since, for independent events:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B))
Then:  = \mbox{Pr}(A) + \mbox{Pr}(B) - \mbox{Pr}(A) \cdot \mbox{Pr}(B))
corrected.
at least you're not deleting incorrect posts any more, and taking all the credit by editing one line of someone elses work, kinda a good thing your power is gone eh?
lol, i delete my own incorrect posts because they don't contribute anything.
and i plan to delete this post when coblin fix his post, so...
GG
-
You've deleted coblin's posts before on a maths board. It is disgusting behaviour.
Why the hell would I care what you do to your own posts? When you infringe upon the rights of others is when I get angry.
-
You've deleted coblin's posts before on a maths board. It is disgusting behaviour.
Why the hell would I care what you do to your own posts? When you infringe upon the rights of others is when I get angry.
I had chocolate ice cream last friday. You should condemn me because there are still kids in Africa in poverty.
-
fuck off caramel, stop picking fights
-
He picked fights about a month before I started fighting back.
If you stay quiet (I originally ignored them hoping he would stop), he does it more.
Now I speak up against him, he stops following my posts and bagging them. Because he doesn't want to look worse than he already is.
I am not staying quiet against this bully. Someone has to stand up to him.
-
You've deleted coblin's posts before on a maths board. It is disgusting behaviour.
Why the hell would I care what you do to your own posts? When you infringe upon the rights of others is when I get angry.
I had chocolate ice cream last friday. You should condemn me because there are still kids in Africa in poverty.
Why would I condemn you for that?
You didn't steal the ice cream. You didn't claim you made the ice cream. You didn't do anything bad.
-
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6047.msg74147.html#msg74147
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6325.msg76895.html#msg76895
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6198.msg75352.html#msg75352
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6198.msg75369.html#msg75369
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6198.msg75498.html#msg75498
The fact of the matter is that he was attacking me and picking fights for ~2 weeks (if you read through, you will find no provoking on my behalf) before I said anything back. Most of the community stays silent. I will not tolerate his bullshit.
THis is how you get treated when you do Mao a big favour. I would suggest no one copies my mistake. Don't show him kindness because it bites you back on the arse. Hard.
-
CARAMEL WITH INVASION THREAD FIGHITNIG ~!~!~!
CHOCORATE ICED-CREAM LINKING TO AFRICAN CHILD ?~!~ NEW LEVEL ATTACK
-
(http://nissaninfiniticlub.net/photopost/data/500/4455normal_Internet-SeriousBusiness.jpg)
this thread is begging to be split.
-
He picked fights about a month before I started fighting back.
If you stay quiet (I originally ignored them hoping he would stop), he does it more.
Now I speak up against him, he stops following my posts and bagging them. Because he doesn't want to look worse than he already is.
I am not staying quiet against this bully. Someone has to stand up to him.
stfu, fight with him elsewhere. you're not fighting back, you're looking for reasons to fight with him.
hey enwiabe, she's clearly trolling, ban??
-
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6047.msg74147.html#msg74147
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6325.msg76895.html#msg76895
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6198.msg75352.html#msg75352
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6198.msg75369.html#msg75369
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6198.msg75498.html#msg75498
The fact of the matter is that he was attacking me and picking fights for ~2 weeks (if you read through, you will find no provoking on my behalf) before I said anything back. Most of the community stays silent. I will not tolerate his bullshit.
THis is how you get treated when you do Mao a big favour. I would suggest no one copies my mistake. Don't show him kindness because it bites you back on the arse. Hard.
oh, btw, well done. you've quoted me from two threads
one of them is the exam uploading thread..... [we all know how the collective student community feel about that: the more the merrier]. if you be the side that stays silent, then in that thread I can say with fair confidence that my contention is shared by many.
the second is the abortion thread..... the attack was aimed at brendan/coblin's arguments [and indeed all rationalists]
so that brings me to ask: is this what you think hostility is?
-
children, children, no more of this public bickering. Take it to a private channel. Don't make me reprimand you guys :(
-
moving back onto the topic; how do I deal with this question :p
-
=\frac{1}{2})
-
thanks
-
You've deleted coblin's posts before on a maths board. It is disgusting behaviour.
Why the hell would I care what you do to your own posts? When you infringe upon the rights of others is when I get angry.
I had chocolate ice cream last friday. You should condemn me because there are still kids in Africa in poverty.
OT:
That's the fundamental difference between the idea of human "rights" and what is a sustainable set of rights. When people believe that kids in Africa have some inherent "right" to food, although it is well-intentioned, it implies they have the right to coerce others to attain that food. On the other hand, libertarians believe that the set of rights that humans have are based on what they cannot do - that is, they cannot infringe on the rights of others. When you produce rights based on what they can do, it means they have some command over resources that they do not own, and it is not viable in a world with scarce and finite resources.
It's the contest between positive rights and negative rights.
That said, however, when you post on a private forum, you don't have the right to have your post permenantly etched into the server. It is to the discretion of the owner (and whoever the owner delegates to moderate).
Don't be silly about the rationalist thing. I've made a few posts explaining the flexibility of rationalism, and I've explained to you on IRC how rational behaviour encompasses any kind of value-input (including yours!). The only reason why you love quipping "rationalist, rationalist!" is because you used to be able to fool people into thinking that Brendan and I have a heart of stone. If you actually read our posts, you would see we acknowledge that other opinions are well-intentioned but we show how they do not actually get them to that point.
-
} }{e^{19}} )
Oh sorry, am I in the wrong place?
-
Hmm, does anybody have any questions which are similar to "consider equation f(x). Find the tangent which touches this curve and passes through the origin"?
I need some practice with these questions...I've only done like 3 in my whole life >.<.
-
Yup, I was just doing one then!
Let
. Find the equation of the tangent to f(x) that passes through the origin.
-
neap 2006? :p
lol thanks anyway bec :)
-
haha i tried
-
"State the maximal domain for
"
In a previous part of this question I sketched
...do I use that graph to help me or do I work it out algebraically?
-
Well, all you need to do is look at the graph and see all the points where y is negative and NOT count those in the domain.
Remember that you can't take the square root of a negative number, but all other values are ok!
-
oh thanks =]
-
And don't forget to not include the asymptote, but to include the x-intercepts.
-
You've got two main conditions that need to be satisfied (the intersection of these two):
1) 
2) 
The second one is a bit more complicated:
Either (i) or (ii) are acceptable domains (i.e: the union of these domains constitute the 2nd condition)
i) if
, then
, hence: 
ii) if
, then
, hence: 
So, the maximal domain is the intersection of:
1)
, and
2) the union of
and 
So you should get all real values excluding the region
-
You've got two main conditions that need to be satisfied (the intersection of these two):
1) 
2) 
The second one is a bit more complicated:
Either (i) or (ii) are acceptable domains (i.e: the union of these domains constitute the 2nd condition)
i) if
, then
, hence: 
ii) if
, then
, hence: 
So, the maximal domain is the intersection of:
1)
, and
2) the union of
and 
So you should get all real values excluding the region 
or you can sketch the graph and pick the values above the x-axis
-
Same thing. You're solving for the same numbers essentially. This is an analytical approach as opposed to a graphical approach.
-
Coblin, howd you go from here
You've got two main conditions that need to be satisfied (the intersection of these two):
Either (i) or (ii) are acceptable domains (i.e: the union of these domains constitute the 2nd condition)
i) if
, then
, hence: 
ii) if
, then
, hence: 
So, the maximal domain is the intersection of:
2) the union of
and 
So you should get all real values excluding the region 
to here?
-
Where to where?
That should be written as R\(-2,3]. I said it in words.
can be simplified by multiplying both sides by
. However, it's not that simple for an inequality. If we multiply by a negative number, it changes the sign, which is why I have explored both cases.
-
Three threads.
You weren't attacking brendan and coblin, you were attacking my post alone. You didn't answer my question and used it just to mock me (possibly you don't have an answer to it, you seem incapable of explaining your contention)
Bucket: I can't fight with him elsewhere as he has blocked all methods of private correspondance. Quite useful when you borrow something and NEED TO GIVE IT BACK.
-
yeah i read your answer properly coblin thanks a shit load =D
just a thought...how come we wernt taught this inequality stuff in earlier years?
-
CHOCORATE ICED-CREAM LINKING TO AFRICAN CHILD ?~!~ NEW LEVEL ATTACK
you pisser!! made me laugh LAUGH OUT LOUD,,, reminds me of pokemon
-
Three threads.
You weren't attacking brendan and coblin, you were attacking my post alone. You didn't answer my question and used it just to mock me (possibly you don't have an answer to it, you seem incapable of explaining your contention)
Bucket: I can't fight with him elsewhere as he has blocked all methods of private correspondance. Quite useful when you borrow something and NEED TO GIVE IT BACK.
...get out of my question thread =_=
-
Yup, I was just doing one then!
Let
. Find the equation of the tangent to f(x) that passes through the origin.
can someone explain how to do this? thanks
-
what does it mean by passes through the origin? i thougth that meant passing through (0,0).
-
Yup, I was just doing one then!
Let
. Find the equation of the tangent to f(x) that passes through the origin.
can someone explain how to do this? thanks
 = 12x^2)
We are looking for a tangent:
, which passes through the origin,
.
Therefore:  + c \implies c = 0)

What else do we know? At the point when the tangent touches the curve,
:
1) 
2) 
Substituting this into:
at )

x_1)



Substituting this into equation 2:

Therefore, the tangent is
-
ah fuck im such a retard lol
so pro coblin
-
ah fuck im such a retard lol
so pro coblin
It's a sort of difficult question. Always think of these kind of questions as a quest to assemble the pieces of information you have to find what you want.
-
Yup, I was just doing one then!
Let
. Find the equation of the tangent to f(x) that passes through the origin.
can someone explain how to do this? thanks
 = 12x^2)
We are looking for a tangent:
, which passes through the origin,
.
Therefore:  + c \implies c = 0)

What else do we know? At the point when the tangent touches the curve,
:
1) 
2) 
Substituting this into:
at )

x_1)



Substituting this into equation 2:

Therefore, the tangent is 
awesome, thanks :)
-
This is from 2007 exam 1, i don't know why I have trouble with this =_=
Solve
for 
and
Let
Find the smallest possible value of x of which g(x) is a maximum.
-
for 
Adjust the domain so
goes to 

Just rearrange to solve for x.
=3f(x-1) + 2 )
From above
has a period 3. So from this, and by drawing a quick graph, it has a maximum at
For
the vertical translations don't affect x value in this case. Since it's been translated 1 unit to the right, the maximum must be 
-
ahhhh i get it, except for one part; how did you change the domain?
I was able to solve it without doing so but I'm just curious :p
...I know the exam is in like, 1.5 hours lol but I'm just curious :) If anyone is awake to show me I'd be grateful!
-
You dont really need to adjust the domain.
But you see the original domain is [0,3]
the 0<x<3
u times 2pi/3 into x
whatever you to do x
you to '3' and '0'
therefore
2pi/3 x 3
= 6pi /3
= 2pi
therefore 0<2pix/3 <2pi
Bucket is that really you in the picture? i really wanna punch you in the face LOL :D
-
OMG OMG OMG OMG THE EXAM IS IN 1 HOUR!
-
It's not me lol.
www.yearbookyourself.com
-
LOL COOL.
-
How do you do this?? Note this is from a CAS exam.
[IMG]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/6826/questionxt9.th.jpg[/img][IMG]http://img375.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif[/img]
-
How do you do this?? Note this is from a CAS exam.
[IMG]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/6826/questionxt9.th.jpg[/img][IMG]http://img375.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif[/img]
HAHA. I just did this question.
The best way is to solve for a,b,c,d,e on ur cas using matrices.
We know that a=.1 and c=3.9
Therefore, c=39 x .1
c = 3.9
Hence, c=39a
So the answer is D.
-
How do you do this?? Note this is from a CAS exam.
[IMG]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/6826/questionxt9.th.jpg[/img][IMG]http://img375.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif[/img]
wow! which exam is that from?
-
geez that takes a lot of time for a multi choice q :S
its from tssm cas 2008
-
I reckon. It took me like 3 minutes.
-
if that was on the exam i would simply guess and move on..
-
The graphs of
intersects the graph
at two distinct points for:
a. 
b.
or 
c. 
d. 
e. 
How do I work this out quickly?
-
make the 2 equations equal. Take all to one side. Apply Discriminant and it mut be >0
-
oh. simple enough. thanks.
-
Hmm, I really am not good with inequalities.
Here is my working for this question.


x-3=0)
to have two solutions
^2+12 > 0)
This is where I stuff up.
^2 > 12)

or
I know I've done something wrong here with the inequality sign lol.
The correct answer is
or
. Where does the < sign come in? :P
-
Its best to draw the graoh of
and
, see where they intersect and see where
is greater than
.
Remember, when you have non-linear inequalities, you must draw the graph, or at the very least visualise it, in order to solve the inequality!
-
Oh yeah we can use our calculators!
Lol thanks a lot man.
-
Is {
}= asking for solutions? lol.
-
Is {
}= asking for solutions? lol.
yup, its asking for the values of x. also : (colon) means 'such that'
-
Bucket im curious what you got for this, cause i did this earlier today and i got
 = 0 and Cos(x) = -2)
And the answer stated that it was
alone. i think
-
can't equal -2.
-
Think about the graph of of
. For any value of
,
it can't be -2 (the range is [-1,1]) so the only solution is
-
"If c=20 calculate the probability that a type A butterfly is misclassified and a type B butterfly is misclassified."
WTF IS C???
-
sounds like cont-random/normal dist.
what's the full question?
-
Thats part G of a question 4 in here.