ATAR Notes: Forum

Archived Discussion => 2010 => End-of-year exams => Exam Discussion => Victoria => Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: studyingsucks on November 08, 2010, 05:55:14 pm

Title: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: studyingsucks on November 08, 2010, 05:55:14 pm
Sooooooo. Who actually doesn't need Methods next year, and felt like they've wasted their time this year and got beaten up in exams?

While I'm on the topic on not needing a certain subject, I might even add the fact that I do chemistry and I dont' even need it.... I don't plan to do anything do to with science.
Stupid choices :(
Title: Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: JinXi on November 08, 2010, 05:56:13 pm
Methods Makes you smarter +D
Title: Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: lorcan_raven on November 08, 2010, 05:58:27 pm
@JinXi, I completely agree... Though I am hereon pursuing a future in the Arts (theatrical performance and Law), I am glad I kept Methods up throughout my schooling because I've at least shown all those "doubters" that I am capable in all areas of learning, and not "just a humanities kid" haha.
Title: Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: minilunchbox on November 08, 2010, 06:00:56 pm
I need it. But I feel like I've wasted my entire week in which I hardcore studied for methods and neglected my other two subjects because I genuinely thought that I could end up acing the exam.

GOOD GOD, I COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG.
Title: Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: slothpomba on November 08, 2010, 06:02:08 pm
Quote from: minilunchbox on November 08, 2010, 06:00:56 pm
I need it. But I feel like I've wasted my entire week in which I hardcore studied for methods and neglected my other two subjects because I genuinely thought that I could end up acing the exam.

GOOD GOD, I COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG.

This...

I plan for it in my bottom... so ill only get 10% of it... 10% of all that effort... should of really studied for my other two top subjects in the comming days where i would get 100%
Title: Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: Puffle on November 08, 2010, 06:05:21 pm
Story of my life..
Why didn't i just stick to humanities?
Title: Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: goshipeoyo on November 08, 2010, 06:07:39 pm
Even though I want to do Arts in the future, I actually like methods and am still taking chem and possibly spesh next year. I like variety and I'm also trying to keep my options open. That said... when my study score comes and it reflects just how shit te papers were this year, I'll just remember that I still don't REALLY need methods :p
Title: Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: studyingsucks on November 08, 2010, 06:24:52 pm
Quote from: minilunchbox on November 08, 2010, 06:00:56 pm
I need it. But I feel like I've wasted my entire week in which I hardcore studied for methods and neglected my other two subjects because I genuinely thought that I could end up acing the exam.

GOOD GOD, I COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG.

hahahahaha Omg I did the same thing, I didn't study for psychology AT ALL
and concentrated on methods...
Title: Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
Post by: ladyy on November 08, 2010, 06:31:10 pm
Quote from: studyingsucks on November 08, 2010, 05:55:14 pm
Sooooooo. Who actually doesn't need Methods next year, and felt like they've wasted their time this year and got beaten up in exams?

While I'm on the topic on not needing a certain subject, I might even add the fact that I do chemistry and I dont' even need it.... I don't plan to do anything do to with science.
Stupid choices :( 


BAD :) my thoughts exactly coming out of that exam