Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 13, 2025, 10:18:42 am
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?  (Read 1499 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

studyingsucks

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: +1
WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« on: November 08, 2010, 05:55:14 pm »
0
Sooooooo. Who actually doesn't need Methods next year, and felt like they've wasted their time this year and got beaten up in exams?

While I'm on the topic on not needing a certain subject, I might even add the fact that I do chemistry and I dont' even need it.... I don't plan to do anything do to with science.
Stupid choices :(
« Last Edit: November 08, 2010, 05:59:06 pm by studyingsucks »
Logged

JinXi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 818
  • Respect: +90
  • School: Camberwell High School
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2010, 05:56:13 pm »
0
Methods Makes you smarter +D
Logged
Monash B.Aero Eng/Sci Discontinued in Sem2 2012 [2011-2015]

"I will always choose a lazy person to do a difficult job… because, he will find an easy way to do it." ~ Bill Gates
^ SNORLAX, I chooosee You!!!

lorcan_raven

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • "Wit beyond measure is man's greatest treasure"
  • Respect: +1
Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2010, 05:58:27 pm »
0
@JinXi, I completely agree... Though I am hereon pursuing a future in the Arts (theatrical performance and Law), I am glad I kept Methods up throughout my schooling because I've at least shown all those "doubters" that I am capable in all areas of learning, and not "just a humanities kid" haha.
Logged
2009 - Psychology (36)
2010 - {AIMS} English (48+) Methods (~35) Further (~44) Japanese SL (~35) Theatre Studies (43+)

minilunchbox

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1001
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2010, 06:00:56 pm »
0
I need it. But I feel like I've wasted my entire week in which I hardcore studied for methods and neglected my other two subjects because I genuinely thought that I could end up acing the exam.

GOOD GOD, I COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG.
Logged
2011-13: Bachelor of Science (Pharmacology) @ University of Melbourne

slothpomba

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4458
  • Chief Executive Sloth
  • Respect: +327
Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2010, 06:02:08 pm »
0
Quote from: minilunchbox on November 08, 2010, 06:00:56 pm
I need it. But I feel like I've wasted my entire week in which I hardcore studied for methods and neglected my other two subjects because I genuinely thought that I could end up acing the exam.

GOOD GOD, I COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG.

This...

I plan for it in my bottom... so ill only get 10% of it... 10% of all that effort... should of really studied for my other two top subjects in the comming days where i would get 100%
Logged

ATAR Notes Chat
Philosophy thread
-----
2011-15: Bachelor of Science/Arts (Religious studies) @ Monash Clayton - Majors: Pharmacology, Physiology, Developmental Biology
2016: Bachelor of Science (Honours) - Psychiatry research

Puffle

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2010, 06:05:21 pm »
0
Story of my life..
Why didn't i just stick to humanities?
Logged

goshipeoyo

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Respect: +1
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2010, 06:07:39 pm »
0
Even though I want to do Arts in the future, I actually like methods and am still taking chem and possibly spesh next year. I like variety and I'm also trying to keep my options open. That said... when my study score comes and it reflects just how shit te papers were this year, I'll just remember that I still don't REALLY need methods :p
Logged
2010: Chinese SL (44) Methods CAS (43)
2011: Chemistry (38) International Studies (41) Literature (48) Specialist Maths (35)
ATAR: 99.65
2012-2015: University of Melbourne BA (Economics and Geography), Dip. Lang (Chinese)

Offering tuition in VCE English, Methods and Lit

studyingsucks

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: +1
Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2010, 06:24:52 pm »
0
Quote from: minilunchbox on November 08, 2010, 06:00:56 pm
I need it. But I feel like I've wasted my entire week in which I hardcore studied for methods and neglected my other two subjects because I genuinely thought that I could end up acing the exam.

GOOD GOD, I COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG.

hahahahaha Omg I did the same thing, I didn't study for psychology AT ALL
and concentrated on methods...
Logged

ladyy

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 133
  • Respect: +6
Re: WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY NEED METHODS?
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2010, 06:31:10 pm »
0
Quote from: studyingsucks on November 08, 2010, 05:55:14 pm
Sooooooo. Who actually doesn't need Methods next year, and felt like they've wasted their time this year and got beaten up in exams?

While I'm on the topic on not needing a certain subject, I might even add the fact that I do chemistry and I dont' even need it.... I don't plan to do anything do to with science.
Stupid choices :( 


BAD :) my thoughts exactly coming out of that exam
Logged
Yaaah B*tch Yaaah!
Pages: [1]   Go Up