Just out of curiosity, RNA molecules would be shorter than DNA, right? I mean, logically, they would be, but seeing as I don't really trust my brain, can anyone confirm? Thanks 
Well, it really depends on:
- The sequence length of the DNA strand - understandably it can vary greatly
- If the RNA strand is mRNA.
If the second point holds true, we can arrive at two different conclusions based on the stage of mRNA synthesis. In
Unit 4, you will learn that during the synthesis of the mRNA strands used in protein synthesis, there are two main forms of mRNA.
The mRNA strand that is transcribed (via transcription) from the DNA template strand is termed pre-mRNA. It is a complete complementary copy of the DNA template sequence - and it contains both
introns and
exons. Exons are coding sequences (i.e. they will code for something), while introns are non-coding (thought to be regulatory) sequences.
A process occurs called 'RNA splicing', which results in the removal of all intron sequences from the pre-mRNA. The remaining mRNA strand, which is capped by a 'poly-A' tail (as in, AAA... repeating), is termed 'mRNA' and is what is used in translation.
As such, we can say that
pre-mRNA is the same length as the DNA template strand, but the final, spliced mRNA is shorter.
N.B. You don't need to know this for unit 3, but it always helps to have as broad a knowledge base as possible in biology.