The Syrian intervention will be (if it occurs at all) a slap on the wrist for Assad. It will not have the objective of a regime change. What's been talked about is three or four days of a bombing campaign against Syrian military targets, especially their chemical weapon deliverance capabilities.
Humanitarian intervention does not require UNSC approval.
The video regarding the Rothschilds is a whole bunch of gish gallop regarding the financial system. Inflation is perfectuly natural and positive, your tax money goes towards public spending (and a small minority to paying off interest), and the Kennedy thing...
Well firstly, EO 11110 was part of the
phasing out of Treasury notes in favour of Fed notes. It involved a delegation of the President's already existing power (to print out silver certificates, an alternative to paper currency) to the Treasury. To say that JFK was anti-Fed would be a blatant lie; and that LBJ was part of a the 'Fed conspiracy' and in opposition to JFK on this matter is just hilarious. If this was the case though, wouldn't you think that RFK (who absolutely hated LBJ's guts and considered himself very loyal to his brother) would say something? You know, either way, it was his brother that was killed.
One quick question, though. Suppose that all this is right. Suppose there is a massive conspiracy (there isn't); the Fed is privately owned (it's not); the IRS collects all the tax money in order to pay off debt to the Fed (it doesn't); and you're basically a slave to the Rothschilds (just lol).
Where's the problem, exactly? Can you show me how it actually
does adversely affect you? Let me tell you what the advantages of a central banking system are - I'm not expert, but I can tell you a few things. In the 19th, you had a financial crisis every 10 years or so. They were the most economically volatile times in modern history. Ever since central banking has been introduced, we've had far fewer recessions. The three main exceptions are the Great Depression, international trade related stuff (oil crises), and the recent economic downturn.
Oh, it's interesting to note that FDR was not mentioned in the video at all. The most anti-bank President? The one who signed Glass-Steagall? The New Deal? You don't think he'd have done anything to stop the Fed conspiracy? He didn't, because it's nonexistent.
You see, the real problem with the banking system is mostly that banks have been allowed to become too large and unregulated since the 80s, as part of the general neoliberal agenda of deregulation. Ever since, the real median wealth has barely increased - or maybe even decreased, depending on your exact measure - for most people. But from the 30s until the 80s, you had people becoming far better-off. Perhaps the quickest growth in wealth in real terms of the median person. All this while your Fed conspiracy was supposedly in full force.
The video is simply Austrian propaganda. It's fit to laugh off just the same as North Korean propaganda videos, with the ridiculous storyline and all. At least the ending made me laugh.
EDIT:
You're going to want to read this
Home
Help
Search
Login
