Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 22, 2025, 09:07:45 am

Author Topic: PHYS20008 membrane potential question  (Read 20153 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MelonBar

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 603
  • Respect: +58
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #45 on: September 14, 2014, 09:24:22 pm »
0
thanks, good point about the acetylcholine. for the first question, I'm thinking the vagus nerve has to do with gastric motility, so severing that would mean no motility in the lower GI tract.

the other options are, stop salivating at the sight of food (incorrect I believe, cranial nerve does this), increased production of gastric juices normally associated with eating would be delayed until food reached the stomach, the increase of chyme from the stomach into the small intestine would become impaired, and all smooth muscle sphincters would lock in the closed position - what do we think?

ehhh the ENS is still in tact, didn't consider that one
« Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 09:26:46 pm by MelonBar »
2012: VCE
2013-2015: BSc (Neuroscience) @ UoM

LeviLamp

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
  • Respect: +151
  • School: (≚ᄌ≚)ℒℴѵℯ❤
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #46 on: September 15, 2014, 04:53:15 am »
0
Comparative Animal Physiology's theory component seems so much more straightforward than Human Phys, ahahahaha (though the four lab reports are a big pain). I actually think I'd appreciate it a lot more; we didn't cover any digestive physiology at all, other than a little bit of comparison between various animals and their digestion techniques :( also CHARLES
VCE: Chemistry | Biology (2011) | English (2011) | Environmental Science | Mathematical Methods CAS

2013-2015: BSc [Zoology] @ UoM | DLang [German - DISCONTINUED]
2016: GDSc [Botany] @ UoM
2017-2018: MSc [Biosciences - Zoology] @ UoM

Summer: BOTA30006

S1: BOTA20001 | EVSC20004 | BOTA30003 | BIOL90001

S2: GEOG20009 | BOTA30002 | BOTA30005 | EVSC20003 | NRMT90002

Subject and major reviews incoming :)

hobbitle

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Respect: +110
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #47 on: September 15, 2014, 10:13:57 am »
0
Obviously too late because the concept check has closed but might be worth a discussion anyway:

for the first question, I'm thinking the vagus nerve has to do with gastric motility, so severing that would mean no motility in the lower GI tract.
As you say below, the ENS is still in tact, so motility would continue presumably.

Quote
the other options are, stop salivating at the sight of food (incorrect I believe, cranial nerve does this),
Actually the "Vagus Nerve" slide says that the Vagus Nerve does trigger this kind of anticipatory response (long reflex).  what do you think?

Quote
increased production of gastric juices normally associated with eating would be delayed until food reached the stomach,
Yeah this would probably happen if vagus nerve was severed, as Vagus nerve stimulates acid secretion in anticipation of food entering stomach.

Quote
the increase of chyme from the stomach into the small intestine would become impaired,
Hmm sounds too far down the GI tract for the vague nerve to have effect, I think it works from the stomach and above?  Notes do say that the vagus nerve has an affect on the gastro-esophagael sphincter but the pyloric sphincter isn't mentioned.

Quote
and all smooth muscle sphincters would lock in the closed position - what do we think?
Nah don't think so............ as you say, ENS still in tact?

Hmm Digestive System is quite confusing!
2008 - 2010 | Bachelor of Production @ Victorian College of the Arts
2013 - 2015 | Bachelor of Science @ UoM (Bioengineering Systems)
2016 - 2017 | Master of Engineering (Biomedical) @ UoM

hobbitle

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Respect: +110
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #48 on: September 17, 2014, 08:27:45 pm »
0
Totes vasoconstricting the crap out of my sprained ankle with this ice pack.
But not too much you know because we don't want to disrupt the... physiology n stuff.
2008 - 2010 | Bachelor of Production @ Victorian College of the Arts
2013 - 2015 | Bachelor of Science @ UoM (Bioengineering Systems)
2016 - 2017 | Master of Engineering (Biomedical) @ UoM

hobbitle

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Respect: +110
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #49 on: October 28, 2014, 02:46:34 pm »
0
What happens if voltage gated Sodium channels can't open at all, is it possible to fire an AP at all, ever? Will APs be impossible?
2008 - 2010 | Bachelor of Production @ Victorian College of the Arts
2013 - 2015 | Bachelor of Science @ UoM (Bioengineering Systems)
2016 - 2017 | Master of Engineering (Biomedical) @ UoM

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Respect: +410
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #50 on: October 28, 2014, 03:03:48 pm »
0
^I think it's impossible
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne

Starlight

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2948
  • Respect: +275
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #51 on: October 28, 2014, 03:05:19 pm »
0
What happens if voltage gated Sodium channels can't open at all, is it possible to fire an AP at all, ever? Will APs be impossible?

^I think it's impossible

Agreed. The real stimulus for an AP is opening the VG sodium channels at threshold.
2012-2014. BSc: Neuroscience. University of Melbourne.
2015-2018. Doctor of Optometry. University of Melbourne.

Unlikely to respond to any PMs these days.

hobbitle

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Respect: +110
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #52 on: November 02, 2014, 01:37:39 pm »
0
So I'm just turning this thread into a general PHYS20008 study thread.

I have a few questions where I'm not confident in my answers.  Can we discuss?

1) In which of the following scenarios would peripheral chemoreceptors most likely be dominant over central chemoreceptors in regulating ventilation?
A. When locked in a sealed environment
B. At high altitudes
C. During Exercise
D. At extremely low temperatures

2. How would removing inactivation gates from all Na+ Volatage Gated channels affect the MAXIMUM FREQUENCY at which a neurone can fire?
A. Increase frequency
B. Decrease frequency
C. No Change
D. Not enough information

3. How would blocking voltage-gated K+ channels affect the MAXIMUM FREQUENCY at which a neurone can fire?
A. Increase frequency
B. Decrease frequency
C. No Change
D. Not enough information

4.  What affect on the likelihood of the axon hillock reaching threshold potential would this have: Synchronising IPSPs arriving from different sources so they arrive at the same time.
A. More likely
B. Less likely
C. No difference
D. Not enough Information

5.  AP firing frequency is determined by an inward Na+/Ca2+ current called I Funny in which muscle cells? Cardiac auto rhythmic cells?

6.  EC coupling is dependant on Ca2+ binding to calmodulin in which muscle cells?  Smooth muscle?

7.  Which muscle cell type has no t-tubules? I have no idea - smooth muscle?

Do you all disagree or agree with my Bold answers?

My last question related to ventilation and I am having a TONNE of trouble getting my head around questions like the one I've attached. Does anyone have any ideas or good ways of visualising/conceptualising what happens? I seem to THINK I get it but then always seem to get the complete opposite answers.  Halp!
2008 - 2010 | Bachelor of Production @ Victorian College of the Arts
2013 - 2015 | Bachelor of Science @ UoM (Bioengineering Systems)
2016 - 2017 | Master of Engineering (Biomedical) @ UoM

Belgarion

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
  • Respect: +18
  • School: BB College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #53 on: November 02, 2014, 02:01:01 pm »
0
So I'm just turning this thread into a general PHYS20008 study thread.

I have a few questions where I'm not confident in my answers.  Can we discuss?

1) In which of the following scenarios would peripheral chemoreceptors most likely be dominant over central chemoreceptors in regulating ventilation?
A. When locked in a sealed environment
B. At high altitudes
C. During Exercise
D. At extremely low temperatures

2. How would removing inactivation gates from all Na+ Volatage Gated channels affect the MAXIMUM FREQUENCY at which a neurone can fire?
A. Increase frequency
B. Decrease frequency
C. No Change
D. Not enough information

3. How would blocking voltage-gated K+ channels affect the MAXIMUM FREQUENCY at which a neurone can fire?
A. Increase frequency
B. Decrease frequency
C. No Change
D. Not enough information

4.  What affect on the likelihood of the axon hillock reaching threshold potential would this have: Synchronising IPSPs arriving from different sources so they arrive at the same time.
A. More likely
B. Less likely
C. No difference
D. Not enough Information

5.  AP firing frequency is determined by an inward Na+/Ca2+ current called I Funny in which muscle cells? Cardiac auto rhythmic cells?

6.  EC coupling is dependant on Ca2+ binding to calmodulin in which muscle cells?  Smooth muscle?

7.  Which muscle cell type has no t-tubules? I have no idea - smooth muscle?

Do you all disagree or agree with my Bold answers?

My last question related to ventilation and I am having a TONNE of trouble getting my head around questions like the one I've attached. Does anyone have any ideas or good ways of visualising/conceptualising what happens? I seem to THINK I get it but then always seem to get the complete opposite answers.  Halp!
For the first one i would say at high altitudes b/c peripheral chemoreceptors respond more to O2 (central more to CO2) and at high altitudes there is a significant reduction in P(O2). During exercise, unless it is extreme exercise, O2 doesnt have much of an effect. All the other ones i agree with

Bachelor of Biomedicine III @ UniMelb
Major: Cell and Developmental Biology

hobbitle

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Respect: +110
Re: PHYS20008 membrane potential question
« Reply #54 on: November 02, 2014, 04:25:06 pm »
0
Oh! Clever. Yes. Agree. Thankyou.
2008 - 2010 | Bachelor of Production @ Victorian College of the Arts
2013 - 2015 | Bachelor of Science @ UoM (Bioengineering Systems)
2016 - 2017 | Master of Engineering (Biomedical) @ UoM