PHYS20009 Research-Based Physiology and PHYS20008 Human Physiology

[mikehepro]

Hey guys!!
For those who have done PHYS20009   Research-Based Physiology, what are your experience of taking this subject?
Furthermore, Will it be more advantageous to take it con-currently with PHYS20008 Human Physiology?
Thank you!!!

[ChickenCh0wM1en]

Hey guys!!
For those who have done PHYS20009   Research-Based Physiology, what are your experience of taking this subject?
Furthermore, Will it be more advantageous to take it con-currently with PHYS20008 Human Physiology?
Thank you!!!

Please read my subject review Re: University of Melbourne - Subject Reviews & Ratings

[Holmes]

I see no advantage or disadvantage in doing them concurrently, but I did human phys a semester before research phys and I found this helpful because in the research phys pracs I already knew the theory really well.

On that note, I absolutely loved human phys but research phys on the other hand was soooo boring and I learnt nothing new in the lectures, the content was 95% a repeat of things taught in human phys but research phys taught it extremely poorly. The lectures were mind-numbing, esp. opposed to the human phys lecs which were lectured very well by Charles.

[mikehepro]

I see no advantage or disadvantage in doing them concurrently, but I did human phys a semester before research phys and I found this helpful because in the research phys pracs I already knew the theory really well.

On that note, I absolutely loved human phys but research phys on the other hand was soooo boring and I learnt nothing new in the lectures, the content was 95% a repeat of things taught in human phys but research phys taught it extremely poorly. The lectures were mind-numbing, esp. opposed to the human phys lecs which were lectured very well by Charles.

Ah right I see. sounds like a dry subject. Thank you!