“I think about the feeling I’ve developed for the former German Democratic Republic...I can only describe it as a horror-romance.”
Despite what Funder uncovers, her tale is one of triumph. Discuss.
"I’ve been in a place where what was aid was not real, and what was real was not allowed."
How does Funder demonstrate the ongoing legacy of Stasi oppression on ordinary citizens?
Stasiland is an act of coming to terms with the shame of the past. Discuss.
"Memory like so much else, is unreliable."
How does Funder act as a bridge between the past and the present?
“I’ve been having some odd adventures in your old country! Curiouser and curiouser – I’ve a lot to tell.”
How does Funder’s perspective on coming to terms with the past evolve through her experiences in
Stasiland?Stasiland demonstrates the irrepressible power of the human spirit and that people can rise above crushing social oppression. Discuss.
"I don't want to be a German any more".
In what ways does
Stasiland explore the lingering effects of guilt?
How does
Stasiland portray that fear and paranoia consumes the lives of those Funder interviews?
Much of the Stasi’s behaviour is simply absurd. What drives this madness?
Even though the Berlin Wall came down in 1989,
Stasiland shows that one can never be free from the horrors of tyranny. To what extent do you agree?
Funder is critical of both the individuals who enacted the trauma of the Stasi regime, and of the political structure that supported them.
Discuss.
The reader feels that, despite the unification of Germany, life has not improved for the citizens of the former East Berlin.
Do you agree?
“When I got out of prison, I was basically no longer human.”
What do Funder’s interviews reveal about the impact of the Stasi on its survivors?
"Things have been put behind glass, but they are not yet over.”
There is no justice achieved in
Stasiland. Discuss.
“It is individual acts of resistance that make
Stasiland so engaging.” Discuss.
“This society, it was built on lies…”
Why does Funder find it so difficult to uncover the truth?
“It’s not ever, really, over.”
Why do the individuals in Stasiland find it so difficult to leave their pasts behind?
Funder portrays all the individuals she interviews as victims-even those who were employed by the Stasi” Discuss.
“I think the Stasi people have been punished enough.”
In the light of Funder’s investigation, do you agree?
Funder’s
Stasiland is largely a moving tribute to the women who survived. Do you agree?
Anna Funder is far more than a detached reporter in the text, she is deeply involved in the story itself. To what extent do you agree?
The destruction of individuals’ basic humanity is the worse crime committed by the GDR regime and the Stasi. Is this what Funder uncovers in her investigation?
“He was angry, telling me that history is made of personal stories.”
The power of Funder’s account of the GDR lies in the individual experiences she recounts. Discuss.
4. In her collection of interviews, Funder's own voice is always present, but it never
overpowers the voices of the participants.' Discuss.
Sitting in a car outside the Leipzig Stasi Museum, Miriam waves at the building exclaiming. "You lot are gone." Funder’s book proves how wrong she is.
Do you agree?
“Mauer im Kopt or the Wall in the Head.”
Funder explores how the psychological legacy of the GDR’s totalitarian regime is often worse than the physical toll. Do you agree?
“…the Wall is the thing that defined him.”
Funder explores how lives were fundamentally re shaped by the Wall.” To what extent do you agree?
Stasiland uses the stories of ordinary people to shed light on the reality of the GDR regime.
Discuss the interrelationship between the personal and the political in the text.
What is the effect of Funder’s first person narrative style in
Stasiland?Discuss the different kinds of courage demonstrated by the individuals in
Stasiland.Funder’s detachment as a non-German provides readers with a more credible and objective perspective on the GDR. Do you agree?
Funder employs pathos, black humour and absurdity in her depiction of the GDR and Stasi regime and its activities to strengthen the impact of her account. Discuss.
“People were crazy with pain and secrets.”
Discuss the role of these elements in
Stasiland. Stasiland uses the stories of ordinary people to shed light on the reality of a regime. Discuss the interrelationship of the personal and the political in the text.
Funder’s attitudes and understanding shifts over the course of the text. Discuss.
“There’s clearly a portion of the past here that cannot be pinned down with facts, or documents”.
Discuss this statement in relation to
Stasiland.Anna Funder is more than a detached storyteller in Stasiland, she is deeply involved in the story itself. Do you agree?
Engage
The balance Funder maintains between sensitivity and practicality makes Stasiland both devastating and uplifting for the reader.’ Discuss.
What is the effect of Funder’s first person narrative style in
Stasiland?
“You cannot destroy your past, nor what it does to you. It’s not ever, really, over.”
Stasiland reflects on the power that memories have on people’s lives. Discuss.
Stasiland isn't just a story of trauma and suffering, it is also one of optimism in the face of great obstacles. To what extent do you agree?
Julia says to Anna: ‘‘You have to look at how normal people manage with such things in their pasts.’’
Stasiland explores how ordinary individuals cope with past trauma. Discuss.
Funder coherently strings together several different time periods to create a single powerful narrative. Discuss.
“Does telling your story mean you are free of it? Or that you go, fettered, into your future?”
Funder discovers that there is no one way of processing memories or coping with one’s traumatic experiences.’ Discuss.
Funder’s writing explores how the wall was not just a physical barrier, but a psychological one as well. Discuss.
Funder's account attempts to tell both sides of the story, but ends up allocating blame and sumpathy to different groups nonetheless. Discuss.
"This society, it was built on lies - lie after lie after lie."
Stasiland suggests that truth is a fallible concept. Discuss.
VATE
2014:
i. "I think about the feeling I've developmed for the former German Democratic Republic... I can only describe it as a horror-romance."
Despite what Funder uncovers, her tale is one of triumph. Discuss.
OR
ii. Anna Funder is more than a detached storyteller in
Stasiland, she is deeply involved in the story itself. Do you agree?
2015:
i. "She is brave and strong and broken all at once."
Does the reader admire the characters in
Stasiland or pity them?
OR
ii. Why do so many victims of the GDR find it difficult to leave the past behind?
ATAR Notes 2014 exams
Exam 3:
i. In
Stasiland, the truth is not only stranger, but more evocative than fiction. Discuss.
OR
ii. How does Funder create a sense of a fractured country which ‘no longer exists’?
ATAR Notes 2015 exams
Exam 1:
i. “This sleight of history must rank as one of the most extraordinary innocence manoevers of the century.”
The question of accountability in Funder’s narrative is one that plagues many of the characters. Discuss.
OR
ii.
Stasiland shows how the hardest battles occur inside oneself. Do you agree?
Exam 2:
i. How does Funder illustrate the value of small victories amidst suffering?
OR
ii In
Stasiland, Funder depicts a place that has been changed by claustrophobia and oppression. Discuss
Exam 3:
i. Anna Funder’s beliefs undergo significant changes over the course of this text. To what extent do you agree?
OR
ii. “You have to look at how normal people manage with such things in their pasts.”
In
Stasiland, Funder shows that simply coping is a victory in itself. Do you agree?
Exam 4:
i. Some characters in
Stasiland are completely irredeemable. Do you agree?
OR
ii. “We don't catch hold of an idea, rather the idea catches hold of us and enslaves us and whips us into the arena so that we, forced to be gladiators, fight for it.”
To what extent are the characters in
Stasiland victims of their own mindsets?
ATAR Notes 2016 exams
Mid-year:
i. In
Stasiland, the effects of the past permeate the lives of characters in the present. Discuss.
OR
ii. Funder's
Stasiland is more about hope than fear. Do you agree?
Exam 1:
i. “The only thing that ever got clearer was that they had the power, in the circumstances.”
Funder’s
Stasiland is about the perspectives of those deprived of power.
OR
ii. The brutality of the Stasi brings about many unintended consequences. Do you agree?
Exam 2:
i. “‘You have to understand,’ he says, ‘in the context of my father, and of the propaganda of the Cold War – the GDR was like a religion.’”
Does Herr Koch’s view of the GDR align with what Funder presents in
Stasiland? Discuss.
OR
ii. To what extent does Funder’s view of East Germany change over the course of
Stasiland?Exam 3:
i. How does Funder explore shame and regret in
Stasiland?OR
ii. The characters in
Stasiland have markedly different coping mechanisms. Do you agree?
Exam 4:
i. How does Funder’s voice and perspective contribute to our understanding of the inhumanity in
Stasiland?OR
ii. “She had been taken out of time, and out of place.”
The characters in
Stasiland are ultimately unable to feel a sense of connection with their surroundings. Do you agree?
VCAA
2013:
i. It is individual acts of resistance that make Stasiland so engaging. Discuss.
OR
ii. “This society, it was built on lies …”
Why does Funder find it so difficult to uncover the truth?
2014:
i. Funder shows that the victims of the Stasi were never fully healed following the collapse of the East German regime. Discuss.
OR
ii. Many kinds of fear are evident in Funder's account of her experiences in the former East German state. Discuss.
2015:
i. In
Stasiland Funder exposes a world both cruel and absurd. Discuss.
OR
ii. It is the personal testimonies that convey the inhumanity of the Stasi. Discuss.