Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 24, 2025, 05:09:42 pm

Author Topic: rate of chemical reactions  (Read 2134 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

thisongaintgottaname

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 84
  • Respect: +1
rate of chemical reactions
« on: October 11, 2009, 12:13:32 pm »
0
Which of the following changes will Always ensure an increase in the rate of a chemical reaction?
I adding a catalist
II Increasing temp
III Increasing conc
IV Increasing the surface area of the reactant

A I only
B I,II and III only
C I, II, and IV only
D I, II, III and IV

answer says B. It excludes option IV, which looks fine to me?
Have i overlooked anything?

kendraaaaa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 951
  • Respect: +6
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2009, 12:35:54 pm »
0
What if the reactant's a gas? Not sure if that's correct but that was my thinking when doing this question

Edmund

  • Dr. Ruler Snapper
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1849
  • Respect: +95
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2009, 12:58:10 pm »
0
I've seen this question somewhere before.

This is what I think. Increasing surface area increases the frequency of collisions, but it is only the frequency of successful collisions that accounts for increased rate of reaction. So increasing the surface area itself doesn't increase rate, and probably the other 3 factors does this...
2007-2008 VCE ATAR 90.15
2009-2011 BSc (Unimelb)
2012-2015 DDS (Unimelb)

Booksale: Drugs That Shape Society, Forests in a Global Context

sachinmachin

  • Guest
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2009, 02:37:55 pm »
0
I've seen this question somewhere before.

This is what I think. Increasing surface area increases the frequency of collisions, but it is only the frequency of successful collisions that accounts for increased rate of reaction. So increasing the surface area itself doesn't increase rate, and probably the other 3 factors does this...

+1

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2009, 03:22:40 pm »
0
I've seen this question somewhere before.

This is what I think. Increasing surface area increases the frequency of collisions, but it is only the frequency of successful collisions that accounts for increased rate of reaction. So increasing the surface area itself doesn't increase rate, and probably the other 3 factors does this...

Increasing concentration does precisely the same thing. Only a catalyst and temperature affects the overall proportion of particles that have sufficient activation energy (looking at Maxwell-Boltzman curves). To increase rate of reaction it is often sufficient to increase frequency of collisions, as for a given number of collisions there will always be a certain percentage particles with sufficient energy for reaction. Increasing the surface area does increase rate.

The crux of the question may indeed be the always, it would seem somewhat obvious that when speaking of surface area you refer to a solid, but the answers may be driven by the idea that for a gas 'surface area' will not make a difference.
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

thisongaintgottaname

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 84
  • Respect: +1
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2009, 05:49:48 pm »
0
I've seen this question somewhere before.

This is what I think. Increasing surface area increases the frequency of collisions, but it is only the frequency of successful collisions that accounts for increased rate of reaction. So increasing the surface area itself doesn't increase rate, and probably the other 3 factors does this...

Increasing concentration does precisely the same thing. Only a catalyst and temperature affects the overall proportion of particles that have sufficient activation energy (looking at Maxwell-Boltzman curves). To increase rate of reaction it is often sufficient to increase frequency of collisions, as for a given number of collisions there will always be a certain percentage particles with sufficient energy for reaction. Increasing the surface area does increase rate.

The crux of the question may indeed be the always, it would seem somewhat obvious that when speaking of surface area you refer to a solid, but the answers may be driven by the idea that for a gas 'surface area' will not make a difference.

THANK YOU GUYS :)

bloodboy

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 106
  • Respect: +1
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2009, 09:01:36 pm »
0
Is this from chemology 09? If so, I think you've left out some pretty important details in the question

Over9000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
  • Loves the banter
  • Respect: +20
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2009, 09:05:41 pm »
0
I've seen this question somewhere before.

This is what I think. Increasing surface area increases the frequency of collisions, but it is only the frequency of successful collisions that accounts for increased rate of reaction. So increasing the surface area itself doesn't increase rate, and probably the other 3 factors does this...

Increasing concentration does precisely the same thing. Only a catalyst and temperature affects the overall proportion of particles that have sufficient activation energy (looking at Maxwell-Boltzman curves). To increase rate of reaction it is often sufficient to increase frequency of collisions, as for a given number of collisions there will always be a certain percentage particles with sufficient energy for reaction. Increasing the surface area does increase rate.

The crux of the question may indeed be the always, it would seem somewhat obvious that when speaking of surface area you refer to a solid, but the answers may be driven by the idea that for a gas 'surface area' will not make a difference.
Crux AND indeed, ur on a roll.
Gundam 00 is SOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH GOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDD I cleaned my room

VCE 200n(where n is an element of y): Banter 3/4, Swagger 3/4, Fresh 3/4, Fly 3/4

kendraaaaa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 951
  • Respect: +6
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2009, 08:27:57 pm »
0
by the way, can you pls upload chemology 09 by any chance?

+1

StringFever

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 291
  • Facebook-free since September
  • Respect: +1
Re: rate of chemical reactions
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2009, 08:39:13 pm »
0
2008: Biology
2009: English Literature, Chemistry, Mathematical Methods, Indonesian SL, Theatre Studies