So I've been doing pretty well in lit this year, my last sac was 40/40 (on Harwood's poetry) and all the others have been pretty good too.
But today in a trial exam I had a massive failure in terms of understanding the task. I understood all the poems and saw thematic links, and I could understand how they could be interpreted collectively as a whole text, but I could hardly write a thing.
I barely wrote 250 words per essay, and the words I wrote were total crap. Total writers (analysis) block. Maybe I'm just exhausted who knows.
So, given that I don't lack an understanding of the texts (Hamlet and Harwood's poetry are the one's I've selected) I figure it must be a lack of understanding of the specific demands of the lit exam.
Should I be carrying out something like a poetry analysis on the passages given?
Should I be approaching the passages with a set of ideas which I try to link them with?
I have read examiners reports but still feel a tad sketchy.
ANY ADVICE WOULD BE MASSIVELY APPRECIATED!
Daniel