Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

January 07, 2026, 01:16:44 pm

Author Topic: Do you prioritise your subjects?  (Read 4611 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fyrefly

  • ★☆★ 一期一会 ★☆★
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4495
  • Respect: +307
Re: Do you prioritise your subjects?
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2009, 10:12:58 pm »
0
Yeah, it varied throughout the year though. If a sac was coming up in one subject, I'd study for that and so on... But I pretty much avoided english if I had a choice. In the last week before exams, I studied English A LOT. So I prioritise in the sense that whatever I think is important in the short term, I study more for and not the the long run. By long run, I mean: "I think this subject will be my bottom one, hence I will neglect it the whole year."

Ha ha... I short-term prioritise *all* the time... I would likely fail everything if it wasn't for last-minute study.
|| BComm + DipLang (Jap) @ Monash ||

Over9000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
  • Loves the banter
  • Respect: +20
Re: Do you prioritise your subjects?
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2009, 10:14:54 pm »
0
Yep

Percentage wise i'd say

Spesh - 95%
All other subjects combined - 5%

No jks
Gundam 00 is SOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH GOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDD I cleaned my room

VCE 200n(where n is an element of y): Banter 3/4, Swagger 3/4, Fresh 3/4, Fly 3/4

LFTM

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1072
  • Respect: +1
Re: Do you prioritise your subjects?
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2009, 10:36:51 pm »
0
Next year it will prob be in this order:

Methods
Accounting
then
Further,Legal and i'll probably avoid english language as much as i can.

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Do you prioritise your subjects?
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2009, 10:49:56 pm »
0
Usually the subjects I neglect I do the best in and the subjects I study for I completely screw up. My highest study score so far is from a subject in which my only study was on the day of the exam.

Exactly the same really. BM was the subject I studied least for, followed by Methods given that I had spesh anyway, and these were my two highest scores. I basically spent the entire year on spesh and English, and those two ended up being my lowest raw and even scaled scores. The only exceptions were about a month prior to the mid-years where I spent my entire time on Chemistry, nailed that, and then neglected the end year quite a bit and let my mid-year mark compensate, and then of course, the UMAT cram period after Chemistry where I neglected basically everything.

Is it a good tactic to prioritise your subjects? i.e. try hard in the 4 subjects what will be in top 4? Is this risky or its just best to even it all out?

I presume what you mean is to study hard only for those subjects you expect to be in your top 4. I would say that's not a good tactic. Those bottom 2 should be a backup. There is enough time in VCE to study enough to get to a 45-50 level for every subject you do if you have the foundation built in previous years. But if you try hard only in 4 you're basically dropping that backup option if you get what I mean. And ideally your bottom 2 would be decent contributors. In the end those small differences do help your ENTER.

I still think it's a good idea to prioritise away at least 1 subject, given that you know what you're doing, and 2 if you are absolutely definite about where your strengths and weaknesses lie. One's my recommendation though just incase you absolutely screw up an intended primary four. Firstly, you're only getting 10% of your effort, and secondly, if you know you're not going to do that well anyway, there's really no point. I also disagree with the point that "there's enough time". This depends on who you're talking to; not everyone on this forum commits the same amount of study time. As for the contribution by the bottom 2, I don't think they're decent contributors at all. 10% is hardly anything. With the study time it takes to bring a 30 to a 40 SS, you'll probably gain much more than 1 study score point in a top 4 subject given that you haven't hit a level which has very high diminishing gains (usually around the 45 level). Yes, I know that ideally you'll want to maximise every subject, but time is a limited resource in VCE which is reduced significantly by a number of factors such as extracurricular activities, social gatherings and plain ol' cbf/motivation which cut down the seemingly large pool of time that you have.

i'll probably avoid english language as much as i can.
Don't you need it since it's bound to be in your primary 4? =S Or aren't you aiming at a level where you must need strong subjects for all four.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Do you prioritise your subjects?
« Reply #19 on: November 06, 2009, 10:54:01 pm »
0
Yep

Percentage wise i'd say

Spesh - 95%
All other subjects combined - 5%

No jks
This guy is a spesh nerd, all he does is spesh during every single class lol.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Do you prioritise your subjects?
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2009, 12:17:47 am »
0
^ shinny sorry to keep asking you questions haha, and to be offtopic.

and then of course, the UMAT cram period after Chemistry where I neglected basically everything.

how much did you study for UMAT / what did you do exactly:D
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Do you prioritise your subjects?
« Reply #21 on: November 07, 2009, 03:18:17 pm »
0
Is it a good tactic to prioritise your subjects? i.e. try hard in the 4 subjects what will be in top 4? Is this risky or its just best to even it all out?

I presume what you mean is to study hard only for those subjects you expect to be in your top 4. I would say that's not a good tactic. Those bottom 2 should be a backup. There is enough time in VCE to study enough to get to a 45-50 level for every subject you do if you have the foundation built in previous years. But if you try hard only in 4 you're basically dropping that backup option if you get what I mean. And ideally your bottom 2 would be decent contributors. In the end those small differences do help your ENTER.

I still think it's a good idea to prioritise away at least 1 subject, given that you know what you're doing, and 2 if you are absolutely definite about where your strengths and weaknesses lie. One's my recommendation though just incase you absolutely screw up an intended primary four. Firstly, you're only getting 10% of your effort, and secondly, if you know you're not going to do that well anyway, there's really no point. I also disagree with the point that "there's enough time". This depends on who you're talking to; not everyone on this forum commits the same amount of study time. As for the contribution by the bottom 2, I don't think they're decent contributors at all. 10% is hardly anything. With the study time it takes to bring a 30 to a 40 SS, you'll probably gain much more than 1 study score point in a top 4 subject given that you haven't hit a level which has very high diminishing gains (usually around the 45 level). Yes, I know that ideally you'll want to maximise every subject, but time is a limited resource in VCE which is reduced significantly by a number of factors such as extracurricular activities, social gatherings and plain ol' cbf/motivation which cut down the seemingly large pool of time that you have.


Ah well, it's different for different people I guess. I'm happy with all my subjects so I never really liked the idea at dismissing any one of them.
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics