Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 27, 2025, 12:51:17 am

Author Topic: Stoichiometry Question  (Read 1310 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Wizard

  • Guest
Stoichiometry Question
« on: December 08, 2008, 07:18:09 pm »
0
This is a question I got for Holiday Homework. I suspect that it is from Neap, so if anyone has the book already, providing an answer to this question would be much appreciated :) It is question 1.1.21 in the Stoichiometry and Gravimetric Analysis Section (1.1)

Here is the question:

A 1.60g sample of an organic compound was burnt in excess Oxygen. 0.96g of water and 2.40g of Carbon Dioxide were produced. In a separate experiment, a 2.58g of the organic compound was vapourised. The vapour occupied 1.15L at 130 degrees Celcius (403 Kelvin) and 125 KPa.

Determine the Molecular formula of the compound. I got ethene (C2H4), but probably did something wrong.     

Thanks

unknown id

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 131
  • Respect: +1
Re: Stoichiometry Question
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2008, 07:31:52 pm »
0
Hmm, I got C2H4O2 after a fair bit of calculation

I can see how you derived C2H4 but remember that the molar mass of the compound has to be ~60 g/mol through the equation PV = nRT. The molar mass of ethane is 28 g/mol. Therefore, that leaves 32 g/mol (60 - 28) to be taken by another element present in the compound (most likely, oxygen). This means that the molecular formula of the compund should have 2 oxygen atoms, thus leading to the formula C2H4O2.

 
« Last Edit: December 08, 2008, 07:42:09 pm by unknown id »
VCE Outline:
2007:   Accounting [48]

2008:   English [44], Maths Methods [50], Specialist Maths [41], Chemistry [50], Physics [44]

ENTER: 99.70





Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: Stoichiometry Question
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2008, 07:40:00 pm »
0
Organic compounds burnt in excess oxygen: combustion

If only water and carbon dioxide is produced, then the organic compound is restricted to only containing C, H and O atoms.



(You must have assumed , i.e.: there is no oxygen)

* 2.40g of carbon dioxide implies there is of carbon that must have come from the organic compound (couldn't have come from the oxygen).

* 0.96g of water implies there is of hydrogen that must have come from the organic compound (also couldn't have come from the oxygen).

* This leaves us with of oxygen in the organic compound.



Now: , , and

So:

Hence, the empirical formula is

The second piece of information tells us that:

And since

Since , then the molecular formula must be two times the empirical formula, as 60 is twice as large as 30.

Therefore, the organic compound is as unknown id calculated.

Wizard

  • Guest
Re: Stoichiometry Question
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2008, 08:17:22 pm »
0
lol, I thought it was a hydrocarbon, so I left out the O from the formula. Thanks! :)

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: Stoichiometry Question
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2008, 08:23:04 pm »
0
Ah.

Hydrocarbons: C, H
Carbohydrates: C, H, O
Proteins: C, H, N, O (and possibly others)
Organic compounds: anything, but must contain C

In VCE, you only need to know the results of molecular combustion involving molecules with C, H, O, though. (For curiosity, all the N atoms will become nitrogen dioxide, if I remember correctly).

Wizard

  • Guest
Re: Stoichiometry Question
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2008, 09:44:19 pm »
0
Another Stoich Question :)

The mass of Iron obtained by the complete reduction of 1kg of haematite(Fe2O3) if the ore is 90% pure will be:
a) 350 g
b) 700 g
c) 777 g
d) 389 g

I got 629.5 g. But the answers say C. Could someone tell me if I am right or wrong? Thanks

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: Stoichiometry Question
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2008, 09:47:20 pm »
0
of pure

This means there is:

Yeah, you're right.