Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 01, 2026, 08:29:42 am

Author Topic: Meaningless parametrics question  (Read 1377 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Meaningless parametrics question
« on: December 10, 2008, 08:41:53 pm »
0
I was simply wondering "what's the point" of parametric equations. From what I see, it's just creating the cartesian form of circles, ellipses and hyperbolae using the knowledge of .

I'm still on chapter 1 so I'm not sure if it has much significance later.

Sorry for such a stupid question :P Might delete it later to uh.. save space.  ::)

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: Meaningless parametrics question
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2008, 08:55:01 pm »
0
No such thing as a stupid question. Essential is stupid for putting it in chapter 1. You use it after differential calculus (first half of the course), in vector calculus.

Here's an example of where parametric equations are applied:



Now, that's a position vector, and say we want to find the velocity vector. We need to differentiate the position vector with respect to time.

It would help if we had a function and a function (parametric equations!)

If we did, we would be able to find: , and then we could differentiate it with respect to !

That is the point of them, in VCE.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2008, 08:57:15 pm by coblin »

cobby

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +7
Re: Meaningless parametrics question
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2008, 09:03:05 pm »
0
Coblin your a genius
2008 - Economics
2009 - Maths Methods CAS
          English
          I.T Apps
          P.E

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Meaningless parametrics question
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2008, 09:03:12 pm »
0
Ah thank you so much Coblin ^^

Okay I'll leave this here for those who use Essentials and might be wondering, too.


Coblin your a genius
Is your display name somehow based off "Coblin"? :P
« Last Edit: December 10, 2008, 09:06:01 pm by dekoyl »

cobby

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +7
Re: Meaningless parametrics question
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2008, 09:38:06 pm »
0
Ah thank you so much Coblin ^^

Okay I'll leave this here for those who use Essentials and might be wondering, too.


Coblin your a genius
Is your display name somehow based off "Coblin"? :P

haha nah its based of my surname :)
but its a pretty cool coincedence :P
2008 - Economics
2009 - Maths Methods CAS
          English
          I.T Apps
          P.E

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Meaningless parametrics question
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2008, 10:31:25 pm »
0
It's in chapter one of Quest too. So far to me all their use has been to tell me when it's a semi-ellipse or semi-hyperbola I'm drawing but otherwise yeah in chapter one they don't mean much. But coblin's explanation makes sense :)
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: Meaningless parametrics question
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2008, 08:54:59 pm »
0
Parametric equations offer a more general framework for describing curves (and surfaces!) in two and three dimensions (and beyond). The standard way of describing functions is just a special case of parametric descriptions, since the function y = f(x) can also be described parametrically by . However there are many curves and surfaces which are described with much greater ease parametrically.

If you're lucky enough to continue with maths at a tertiary level you will see why they're such a powerful tool in multivariable and vector calculus, however in VCE I can understand why you might not see them as such!  :)
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Meaningless parametrics question
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2008, 01:14:30 pm »
0
If you're lucky enough to continue with maths at a tertiary level you will see why they're such a powerful tool in multivariable and vector calculus, however in VCE I can understand why you might not see them as such!  :)

As I was reading this thread, I was thinking of exactly the same reply.  But you already made it.

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Meaningless parametrics question
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2008, 01:17:17 pm »
0
Mmmmm tertiary level maths :D




That is all.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.