Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 27, 2025, 10:22:18 am

Author Topic: DCC'S SUPER AWESOME FUN HAPPY TIME SPEC QUESTIONS EDITION 1  (Read 1262 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
0
subject says it all.

answers will be done if the community REQUESTS IT

THANKS, DCC.

enwiabe

  • Putin
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4358
  • Respect: +529
Re: DCC'S SUPER AWESOME FUN HAPPY TIME SPEC QUESTIONS EDITION 1
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2009, 12:00:47 am »
0
I have the answer to Part F: Prove that dcc is no life.

The proof is the attachment in the original post.

:P jk nice work dcc.

Cthulhu

  • Guest
Re: DCC'S SUPER AWESOME FUN HAPPY TIME SPEC QUESTIONS EDITION 1
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2009, 12:01:55 am »
0
I SUSPECT EVERYONE WILL ENJOY DOING THESE.

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: DCC'S SUPER AWESOME FUN HAPPY TIME SPEC QUESTIONS EDITION 1
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2009, 12:02:35 am »
0
Any VCE student who can do question E is awesome. Officially.

Addendum: This involves both the death of enwiabe & the solution to the stated problem.

zzdfa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 328
  • Respect: +4
Re: DCC'S SUPER AWESOME FUN HAPPY TIME SPEC QUESTIONS EDITION 1
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2009, 12:36:48 am »
0
E. was pretty fun,

(ln(64)+5)/36  ?

where'd you get the problem from?


edit: checked my answer on a computer, here's my working

« Last Edit: July 02, 2009, 01:40:18 pm by zzdfa »

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: DCC'S SUPER AWESOME FUN HAPPY TIME SPEC QUESTIONS EDITION 1
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2009, 05:43:38 pm »
0
I think Ahmad said it came from a probability textbook, but I'm not certain.  He may have made it up himself :P

I took essentially the same path, but more stumbling around in the dark.  For :

First off, owing to the fact that is uniform, we know that .  From this, for .


Note that .  This form arises from considering a few 'cases'.  If we have that , then we know that any choice of fulfils our requirements.  Similarly, when , then we require that .

Combining these we attain the following result: