Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 03, 2025, 09:38:54 pm

Author Topic: Most civil court matters should be resolved by way of gun duels  (Read 4273 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cianyx

  • Guest
Re: Most civil court matters should be resolved by way of gun duels
« Reply #15 on: November 21, 2010, 10:05:12 pm »
0
 4NO asobu't . B ut hqwe needx to look atr a teh c ofaenss of thes tuduatiusoim

Cianyx

  • Guest
Re: Most civil court matters should be resolved by way of gun duels
« Reply #16 on: November 21, 2010, 10:05:46 pm »
0
SRoyryry a bit intox9ocvated ri ght now

MuggedByReality

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 606
  • Respect: +5
Re: Most civil court matters should be resolved by way of gun duels
« Reply #17 on: November 22, 2010, 12:54:14 am »
0

  An interesting question might be: should two consenting adults be allowed to fight (aside from organised sport) and how much damage should they be allowed to inflict?

Under Australian law you cannot give consent to receiving severe injury or something like that (we studied a case where consenting adults participating in sadomasochistic sex were convicted of assault)

 I know that's the case at thee moment. I was just thinking about the libertarian idea that what goes on between two consenting adults is no business of the state and wondering what its proponents would advocate allowing two consenting adults to fight each other.
"People living deeply have no fear of death"
                                      -Anais Nin

"In the 2nd grade, they asked us what we wanted to be. I said I wanted to be a ballplayer and they laughed. In the 8th grade they asked the same question and I said a ballplayer again and they laughed a little more. By the 11th grade no one was laughing."
  -Johnny Bench, Hall of Fame baseball player