Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 05, 2025, 09:47:04 pm

Author Topic: The dodgy questions  (Read 7402 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2011, 06:07:07 pm »
+5
Says the one with a 33 in chemistry. Arts Deakin?
33 in chemistry scales to fucking 50 u idiot
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

Thu Thu Train

  • Voted AN's sexiest member 2012
  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 667
  • <3
  • Respect: +336
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2011, 06:12:05 pm »
+3
Id laugh when baws gets 0/2 for the question
Says the one with a 33 in chemistry. Arts Deakin?

My favourite part was how mature you two were.
        (
     '( '
    "'  //}
   ( ''"
   _||__ ____ ____ ____
  (o)___)}___}}___}}___}   
  'U'0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0    0 0
BBSN14

i actually almost wish i was a monash student.

Lucas111

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Respect: 0
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2011, 06:25:28 pm »
0
BAHAHAHHA LOL

blurf

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2011, 07:08:45 pm »
0
I think (hope!) baws is right, because that's what I put. However, he's also a dick. So there's that.

Another question: What did you guys write for the 'Explain Einstein's conclusions' one? Because it was about the photoelectric effect, so that was clearly favouring the particle model, but Einstein didn't entirely conclude that the particle model was right, he instead favoured wave particle duality. So my answer for that one was a bit all over the place. Started with "he concluded that they display both particle and wave properties" and then spent the rest of the answer talking about how the photoelectric effect displayed particle evidence. Then tacked on "since it was already believed to be wave, einstein concluded it must be both" or something idiotic like that.

Pretty sure I'll lose a mark or two there.

Danielhogz

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: 0
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #19 on: November 15, 2011, 07:22:55 pm »
0
I think (hope!) baws is right, because that's what I put. However, he's also a dick. So there's that.

Another question: What did you guys write for the 'Explain Einstein's conclusions' one? Because it was about the photoelectric effect, so that was clearly favouring the particle model, but Einstein didn't entirely conclude that the particle model was right, he instead favoured wave particle duality. So my answer for that one was a bit all over the place. Started with "he concluded that they display both particle and wave properties" and then spent the rest of the answer talking about how the photoelectric effect displayed particle evidence. Then tacked on "since it was already believed to be wave, einstein concluded it must be both" or something idiotic like that.

Pretty sure I'll lose a mark or two there.
I'm pretty sure einstein concluded that light energy was carried in lumps ( photons) and these photons energies were given by: e=hf. And this explained threshold frequency and how interacting photons instantly ejected electrons :S

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2011, 07:51:29 pm »
+2
baws is banned, please stop reporting this thread!

MattM

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Rosehill Secondary College
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #21 on: November 15, 2011, 08:18:53 pm »
+1
this thread <3

seretide

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 293
  • Respect: +7
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2011, 08:25:20 pm »
0
wasnt this question about the emf?

A-i-d-a-n-K

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Respect: +1
  • School: Caulfield Grammar School
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: The dodgy questions
« Reply #23 on: November 15, 2011, 09:48:19 pm »
+1
LIKE A BAWSS
2010: Methods (50)
2011: English [40+] 47.14| Chemistry [47+]46.3| Specialist [45+] 51.83| Physics [48+] 46.87| German [lol] 42.8!
UMAT: 100th
ATAR 99.80
2012: Med / Engineering (Melbourne or Monash?)

"In the face of adversity, we must construct additional pylons."