Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 07, 2025, 04:31:27 am

Author Topic: QM1- CLT  (Read 736 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

azure

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
  • Respect: 0
QM1- CLT
« on: April 18, 2012, 01:52:22 am »
0
Just wondering, will taking a larger sample size always result in greater accuracy/better approximation? Will a larger sample size always result in a more "normal distribution?" Are there any exceptions?

Having a bit of trouble understanding CLT.
2010: Chinese SL
2011: English, Japanese SL, Chemistry, Methods, Economics

97.70

lilaznkev1n

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • illuminati
  • Respect: +19
  • School: Haileybury College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: QM1- CLT
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2012, 10:47:24 pm »
0
Sorry this reply is kinda late.
An exception is that it may not be true when sampling from two different populations and determining which one gives a better approximation. For example, Y has 3000 observations while X has 2500. It may turn out that Y is extremely non-normal, whereas X is only slightly non-normal, in which case assuming normality for X would give a better approximation of true parameters although X has less observations.
However, if both X and Y are distributed in approximately the same manner, then it is true in saying that a larger sample size would provide more accuracy when assuming normality.
2010: Accounting [45], Legal Studies [42]
2011: Methods [38], English [41], Chem [37], Revolutions [44], Vietnamese [22]
ATAR: 97.45
2012-2014: B.Com @ Melb

azure

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
  • Respect: 0
Re: QM1- CLT
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2012, 05:34:00 pm »
0
Hey, thanks for the reply! Understand it now :)
2010: Chinese SL
2011: English, Japanese SL, Chemistry, Methods, Economics

97.70