Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 08, 2025, 08:06:20 pm

Author Topic: Naming Conventions  (Read 1590 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dida

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Respect: 0
Naming Conventions
« on: November 14, 2013, 06:36:23 pm »
0
Hi guys,

Would it be okay to say that naming conventions aid a programmer in identifying certain inputs, outputs and calculations that will occur during a program?

Obviously there is more that can be added to that, but I'm not sure if that^ statement is correct.

Thanks

speedy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Naming Conventions
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2013, 06:53:24 pm »
0
Naming conventions help more with understanding the purpose/function/type of variable just be looking at it.

Identifying inputs, outputs and calculations is more to do with internal documentation - internal documentation helps the reader of the code to understand what is going on.
Physics [50] | Chemistry [45] | English [42] | IT:SD [44]
ATAR: 98.95

Ya Habibi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Naming Conventions
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2013, 07:46:46 pm »
0
Naming conventions help more with understanding the purpose/function/type of variable just be looking at it.

Identifying inputs, outputs and calculations is more to do with internal documentation - internal documentation helps the reader of the code to understand what is going on.

Just as knight said, naming conventions aid the reader in helping them understand what elements or variables do, including their type. It minimises the repetition of words.
2013 Subjects: IT: Software Development (38)

2014 Subjects: Math Methods (36), English (44), French (35), Physics (36), Chemistry (38)

ATAR: 96.85

dida

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Respect: 0
Re: Naming Conventions
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2013, 07:57:32 pm »
0
Okay, got it, thanks guys :)