Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 19, 2026, 07:32:15 pm

Author Topic: Are marks scaled up/down according to a bell curve?  (Read 2325 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

soli_rainy

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Respect: 0
  • School: the University of Melbourne
Are marks scaled up/down according to a bell curve?
« on: July 03, 2015, 05:47:55 pm »
0
Will marks be scaled down if so many people get high marks, in order to ensure that less than 20% of students get an H1?

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Respect: +410
Re: Are marks scaled up/down according to a bell curve?
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2015, 05:50:38 pm »
+1
Depends on the subject.
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne

mahler004

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 492
  • Respect: +65
Re: Are marks scaled up/down according to a bell curve?
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2015, 06:06:23 pm »
+1
Will marks be scaled down if so many people get high marks, in order to ensure that less than 20% of students get an H1?

There's no quota for grades at unimelb, like there is at other universities. That doesn't mean that some departments/subjects won't work on a quota system. Anecdotally, I've heard this is pretty common in Arts subjects (at least in the ones I took) and much less common in science subjects. I've been in subjects where 50% of the class got a H1.

Most subjects don't seem to be scaled. In science subjects scaling up seems more common then scaling down. Scaling to a bell cure doesn't seem too common.
BSc (Hons) 2015 Melbourne

PhD 2016-??? Melbourne

I want to be an architect.