Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 21, 2025, 09:05:54 pm
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: into + conclusion in EAL language analysis  (Read 1787 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stone1997

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: 0
into + conclusion in EAL language analysis
« on: October 25, 2015, 04:18:50 pm »
0
Do I need to write an into and conclusion? If so how long should they be?
Logged

andy.k14

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
  • School: -
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: into + conclusion in EAL language analysis
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2015, 01:56:44 am »
+1
You don't really have to, it's your choice if you want to or not.
I personally do an introduction in which i mention the article, the author, where and when it is published, the tone and the contention. Usually a max of 6 sentences..
However, as i said, you don't really need a conclusion, unless you want to.
I personally was told not to, but if you wish, include the contention and a short summary of your three main points.
Logged

Kel9901

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 158
  • Respect: +2
  • School: Kardinia International College
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: into + conclusion in EAL language analysis
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2015, 10:29:43 am »
+1
Quote from: andy.k14 on October 26, 2015, 01:56:44 am
You don't really have to, it's your choice if you want to or not.
I personally do an introduction in which i mention the article, the author, where and when it is published, the tone and the contention. Usually a max of 6 sentences..
However, as i said, you don't really need a conclusion, unless you want to.
I personally was told not to, but if you wish, include the contention and a short summary of your three main points.

that's what i do too, 3 sentences or so (one for contention and some information, like the name of a newspaper, one for tone, and one for target audience) though it could be more if there's more than one piece, and usually no conclusion, or maybe analysing their conclusion as my last paragraph.
Logged
s=change in displacement for physics
2011: Methods [47]
2012: Spesh [42] Further [47]
2013: UMEP Maths [4.5]
2014: Chem [47] Physics [48] Music Performance [43]
2015: Spesh [redo] English Accounting Music Investigation

YR12015

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Hogwarts
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: into + conclusion in EAL language analysis
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2015, 06:13:28 pm »
0
It would be a bad idea not to. i always do it and can still finish a 3-4/5 page language analysis within 50minutes.
For intro I follow this formula
BACKGROUND INFORMATION (why is this piece of interest)
INTRODUCTION (name of piece, author, date of publication if it has it)
CONTENTION (the articles main argument)
TARGET AUDIENCE (who the target audience it, why does this issue effect them)
IMAGERY (one sentence briefly stating/describing any included images)

For conclusion, it is usually very short
EVALUATION (whether the author has effectively conveyed their argument)
TONE (tone of the piece/style)
EFFECT ON AUDIENCE (which side it appealed to, who might it have alienated)
CONCLUDING SENTENCE (maybe do a small play on words with the title)

Anyway the intro is usually about half-3/4 of a page, intro is about 1/4 of a page.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up