Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 05, 2025, 06:07:28 pm

Author Topic: Modulus  (Read 956 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Modulus
« on: September 11, 2009, 10:11:15 pm »
0
|x+3| => |2x-4|

Solve the inequality for x. (algebraically)

EDIT: nvm thanks d0minicz!
« Last Edit: September 11, 2009, 10:21:31 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
  • Respect: +7
Re: Modulus
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2009, 10:54:53 pm »
0
As far as I remember, it's always good to separate modulus functions. Then determine the individual component functions' domain.

|2x - 4| = 2x - 4, x> 2 ; 4 - 2x, x< 2

|x + 3| = x + 3, x >-3; - x - 3, x< -3

Thus x + 3 = 2x - 4, 4 - 2x

Thus - x - 3 = 2x - 4, 4 - 2x

Now determine overlapping domains. That is, x> -3 and x< 2 overlap. Also, x> -3 and x > 2 overlap.

Solve those equations independently, i.e. x + 3 = 4 - 2x; x = (1/3)

Then x + 3 = 2x - 4; x = 7

Substitute into respective function |x + 3| or |2x - 4| to obtain y coordinate if required.

Hope that helps! =)
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Modulus
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2009, 11:20:33 pm »
0
Thank you!!!

EDIT: did you mean x<-3 and x>2 'overlap'?
« Last Edit: September 11, 2009, 11:25:46 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Modulus
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2009, 12:31:23 am »
0
|x+3| => |2x-4|

First case:
x+3 > 0 , x> -3

x+3 => |2x-4|

second case:
x+3< 0 , x<-3

-(x+3) => |2x-4|

x+3 <= -|2x-4|

For the first case :

if 2x-4 > 0 , x > 2

x+3 => 2x-4

x<=7

if 2x-4< 0 , x<2

x+3 => -(2x-4)

x+3 => -2x+4

3x => 1

x => 1/3

Thus the answer for first case is 1/3<=x<=7

For the second case:

if 2x-4 >0

x+3 <= -2x+4

3x <= 1

x<=1/3

If 2x-4 <0

x+3 <= 2x-4

x=>7

Thus there is no intersection for this case, so no solution

Overall: the answer is 1/3<=x<=7
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

ryley

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
  • Respect: +2
Re: Modulus
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2009, 10:44:37 am »
0
So is that way the preferred method to treating the moduli as sqrt(f(x)^2), squaring both sides, expanding both sides and solving from there? Doing that, I got the same answer, but I was wondering whether or not its suitable as a general method for these.
2008: 3/4: Biology[41]
2009: 3/4: English[37], Chemistry[43], Methods(CAS)[46], Physics[39], Specialist[46]
ENTER: 98.85
B.Sc(Applied Maths) @ Melbourne Uni

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Modulus
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2009, 01:04:05 pm »
0
So is that way the preferred method to treating the moduli as sqrt(f(x)^2), squaring both sides, expanding both sides and solving from there? Doing that, I got the same answer, but I was wondering whether or not its suitable as a general method for these.
Yeah there's a few way of doing it, you could also divide both sides by a say |x+3| so then you can combine the mod into one single mod.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

ryley

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
  • Respect: +2
Re: Modulus
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2009, 03:23:54 pm »
0
But are there any drawbacks to the various methods, or situations where certain methods aren't applicable/suitable?
2008: 3/4: Biology[41]
2009: 3/4: English[37], Chemistry[43], Methods(CAS)[46], Physics[39], Specialist[46]
ENTER: 98.85
B.Sc(Applied Maths) @ Melbourne Uni

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Modulus
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2009, 03:25:44 pm »
0
The one I did above was the longest way, a lot of IFFs and too many different cases.

I guess the other methods are much quicker and shorter, I'd definitely use them in an exam.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Modulus
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2009, 07:41:33 pm »
0
So is that way the preferred method to treating the moduli as sqrt(f(x)^2), squaring both sides, expanding both sides and solving from there? Doing that, I got the same answer, but I was wondering whether or not its suitable as a general method for these.

It is generally a lot easier to deal with it as piecewise functions.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015