I'm more angry at the fact that they make easy exams, which totally just spits on people who spent so much time and effort studying.
Lol. Then i suppose you'll get 50 for all your subjects, ey?
i did not imply that
. I lost 5marks on methods cause i did not look at my calculator. Lost 2 marks no spesh cause my teacher did not teach me slope fields BUT i was suppose to teach myself but it was like "Ill do it after i finish doing this chapter" and hence i forgot. And chem is not really my strongest subject. And my physics i just don't really care. But that doesn't mean i can't say the exams were easy. The whole freakin course for those subjects are simple
Yeah, the higher the standards are, the better at separation the exam is. I was talking to Ahmad about Chemistry vs Physics, and he was talking about how he's better at Physics, so it's unlikely he'd get a better SS in Chemistry, but I was saying: since you're standards for Chemistry and Physics are very high, the chance of you getting 50 in Chemistry and Physics are probably both about the same.
It's the same as when they set an easy exam, and moderate students can catch up to good students because of the easiness of the exam, and the inability of the exam to allow the student to demonstrate their abilities.