Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 30, 2025, 01:23:40 pm

Author Topic: Semester 2 breadth  (Read 3976 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

seretide

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 293
  • Respect: +7
Re: Semester 2 breadth
« Reply #15 on: June 08, 2012, 04:13:45 pm »
+1
Heard a lot of bad things about physics

You shall hear even more now from me. Physics is a nightmare. The tutes are completely pointless; they throw you a question sheet that simply cannot be completed in an hour and give you a tutor who's most likely a PhD student with no teaching experience (At least in my case; he would stumble to explain things and leave mid-way through explaining something to help the other 10 people with their hand up). The lectures and lecturers are unhelpful, even with 2 different lecturers to cover each half of the semester. And, there is a lot of content. A lot of boring content. Surprisingly I learned more in labs than tutes and lectures combined. Terrible, terrible subject.

Okay, now I don't feel as though I am at that much of disadvantage with not doing physics for the gamsat. I will teach myself.

According to a friend of mine who just completed the GAMSAT this year said there was a minimal amount of physics - not worth doing a semester for it. Just grab a physics textbook from year 12 and give it a read. But, I wouldn't worry at all for it

jasrulz63

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 374
  • Respect: +13
Re: Semester 2 breadth
« Reply #16 on: June 08, 2012, 04:19:15 pm »
+1
Really? I thought there was more physics in this GAMSAT than my previous two tries. Though I think you can learn it by yourself, and you don't really need a semester of uni for it.

seretide

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 293
  • Respect: +7
Re: Semester 2 breadth
« Reply #17 on: June 08, 2012, 04:36:14 pm »
0
I really don't know - just relaying what he said

mu-q

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
Re: Semester 2 breadth
« Reply #18 on: June 09, 2012, 02:45:04 pm »
0
Ok, thanks everyone! I was thinking of doing Body, Mind and Medicine: a Dissection. Any ideas on what the subject's like?

claireb

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 144
  • Respect: +3
Re: Semester 2 breadth
« Reply #19 on: June 19, 2012, 10:51:39 pm »
0
Heard a lot of bad things about physics

You shall hear even more now from me. Physics is a nightmare. The tutes are completely pointless; they throw you a question sheet that simply cannot be completed in an hour and give you a tutor who's most likely a PhD student with no teaching experience (At least in my case; he would stumble to explain things and leave mid-way through explaining something to help the other 10 people with their hand up). The lectures and lecturers are unhelpful, even with 2 different lecturers to cover each half of the semester. And, there is a lot of content. A lot of boring content. Surprisingly I learned more in labs than tutes and lectures combined. Terrible, terrible subject.

Is this fundamentals? If anyone who did this can be bothered writing a review/rant that would be great. I am planning to do it next year for the gamsat.

86

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 467
  • Respect: +96
Re: Semester 2 breadth
« Reply #20 on: June 19, 2012, 10:55:12 pm »
0
Heard a lot of bad things about physics

You shall hear even more now from me. Physics is a nightmare. The tutes are completely pointless; they throw you a question sheet that simply cannot be completed in an hour and give you a tutor who's most likely a PhD student with no teaching experience (At least in my case; he would stumble to explain things and leave mid-way through explaining something to help the other 10 people with their hand up). The lectures and lecturers are unhelpful, even with 2 different lecturers to cover each half of the semester. And, there is a lot of content. A lot of boring content. Surprisingly I learned more in labs than tutes and lectures combined. Terrible, terrible subject.

Is this fundamentals? If anyone who did this can be bothered writing a review/rant that would be great. I am planning to do it next year for the gamsat.

No, this is for Physics 1. I've heard bad things about Fundamentals also, however.
Science, Melbourne University.

John President

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 337
  • Mostly Harmless
  • Respect: +45
  • School: Kids, stay in it.
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Semester 2 breadth
« Reply #21 on: June 20, 2012, 08:01:34 pm »
0
Heard a lot of bad things about physics

You shall hear even more now from me. Physics is a nightmare. The tutes are completely pointless; they throw you a question sheet that simply cannot be completed in an hour and give you a tutor who's most likely a PhD student with no teaching experience (At least in my case; he would stumble to explain things and leave mid-way through explaining something to help the other 10 people with their hand up). The lectures and lecturers are unhelpful, even with 2 different lecturers to cover each half of the semester. And, there is a lot of content. A lot of boring content. Surprisingly I learned more in labs than tutes and lectures combined. Terrible, terrible subject.
I'm surprised that you actually learnt something in the labs during Physics 1, because all I learnt was that lab reports can be bullshitted easily! Still I agree, the quality of teaching is pitiful.
The Finnish word pilkunnussija, which translates literally to “comma fucker,” is someone who risks his social wellbeing to annoyingly and persistently point out punctuation errors.

Completed VCE in 2010 - Now doing BSc at UoM