Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 30, 2025, 04:40:29 am

Author Topic: Ethical Issues  (Read 4209 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

melaniej

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +6
Re: Ethical Issues
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2008, 08:33:05 pm »
0
Yeah it is... she was focusing on her own race, which is a narrow, internal cue? Why did you think it wasn't?

mtwtfss

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ethical Issues
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2008, 08:36:06 pm »
0
I wasn't sure because I read choking is related to narrow internal.

She clearly didn't choke, as she won the gold medal.


melaniej

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +6
Re: Ethical Issues
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2008, 08:37:09 pm »
0
Narrow internal doesn't just include choking...
It has many aspects, but choking would fall under the narrow internal category.

mtwtfss

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
  • Respect: +2
Re: Ethical Issues
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2008, 09:47:01 pm »
0
Cheers.

My conclusion is, I hope it's not on the exam, not because I don't know it, but because it's just very stupid!

cafa

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Respect: 0
Re: Ethical Issues
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2008, 11:03:53 pm »
0
good ol sally mcclelland
i doubt ne of that broad/narrow stuff will b on the exam, none of it was mentioned in the live it up text book, how many of the others had/didnt have it?

jakeburn

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: +5
Re: Ethical Issues
« Reply #20 on: November 10, 2008, 12:29:52 pm »
0
i thought that if you were choking you would go narrow external like focusing on outside irrelevent cues