Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 06, 2025, 04:55:37 am

Author Topic: The Melbourne model is looking rather anorexic  (Read 9155 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: The Melbourne model is looking rather anorexic
« Reply #30 on: July 29, 2009, 01:31:32 am »
0
firstly, I really liked that ^ article.

One of the interesting things about the US system that is different from our systems (and which hasn't really been discusssed in the Australian media that much) is the fact that US degrees are 4 years rather than 3 years here in Australia. The Melbourne Model attempts to implement such a 'US style' system within 3 years suggests to me personally that some of the core units for the undergraduate course would have had to be removed to make way for compulsory breadth subjects.
 

secondly, in the US system, you can go on to graduate programs without actually completing a degree. For law you only need to complete two years. So it's all very different.

That's Peter Singer. One of his books "The Life You Can Save" (which is mentioned on the article) I had to read for PHL1030.
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

ninwa

  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8267
  • Respect: +1021
Re: The Melbourne model is looking rather anorexic
« Reply #31 on: July 29, 2009, 01:48:45 am »
0
secondly, in the US system, you can go on to graduate programs without actually completing a degree. For law you only need to complete two years. So it's all very different.
Two years of what? And is it the equivalent of a JD or LLB (or something else)?
(this has nothing to do with the debate, I'm just interested lol)
ExamPro enquiries to [email protected]

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: The Melbourne model is looking rather anorexic
« Reply #32 on: July 29, 2009, 02:26:34 am »
0
secondly, in the US system, you can go on to graduate programs without actually completing a degree. For law you only need to complete two years. So it's all very different.
Two years of what? And is it the equivalent of a JD or LLB (or something else)?
(this has nothing to do with the debate, I'm just interested lol)

I think he means two years undergrad. And yes, whilst that's the minimum, I don't think that's the norm really.
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

costargh

  • Guest
Re: The Melbourne model is looking rather anorexic
« Reply #33 on: July 29, 2009, 03:17:36 am »
0
Another 220 job cuts. Surely students will vote with their VTAC preferences this year?

Quote
[size=13pt][u][b]Battered Melbourne Uni slashes 220 jobs[/b][/u][/size]
Miki Perkins
July 29, 2009

MELBOURNE University will slash 220 full-time academic and administrative staff because its financial position has taken a battering in the economic crisis.


In an email to staff, vice-chancellor Glyn Davis said the crisis had devastated investment returns and a so-called ‘‘economic response program’’ would result in 50 academic and 50 administrative staff taking voluntary redundancies.

Another 120 jobs would go in restrictions on contract renewal, a freeze on hiring, and attrition.

Several faculties, including medicine, the Victorian College of the Arts and Music, land and environment, and economics and commerce needed to cut costs or revamp their structures to remain in the black, Professor Davis said.

A $30 million shortfall had been identified and the university had discussed targets with faculty heads but would not reveal these, he said.

Shocked staff said the job losses were unexpected and philosopher Peter Singer, who divided his time between Melbourne University and Princeton, warned the cuts would make it difficult for Melbourne to live up to its ambitions as an international institution.

‘‘Staff get told the budget is tight, they make cuts, and then the budget gets tighter still,’’ he said. ‘‘If Australia wants a great uni system — as it had in the past — something pretty drastic needs to be done.’’


Senior vice-principal Ian Marshman said the crisis had hit Melbourne University hard because it had the largest endowment of any Australian institution.

From 2005 to 2007, the endowment brought in about $100 million a year, but last year the university lost about $191 million in the financial crisis. The university expects a return of about $40 million in the next three years. The voluntary redundancies are expected to cost the university about $15 million.

The jobs cuts follow a tumultuous two years for the university’s arts faculty, which lost about 65 staff.

Last week a confidential internal report called for a 35 per cent cut in staff salaries at the renowned school of historical studies, and this month the university’s philosophers banded together to decry the loss of academic staff that had resulted in the philosophy school slipping in world rankings.

The university said yesterday the Rudd Government’s abolishment of domestic undergraduate full-fee places last year would cost the university $30 million a year. Melbourne had the largest group of full-fee-paying undergraduates in Australia.

Professor Davis pointed to the decline, in real terms, of Commonwealth funding, and cost of voluntary student unionism, as reasons for a drop in investment revenue.

National Tertiary Education Union branch president Ted Clark said he was shocked the university had announced outrageous job cuts in an enterprise bargaining period.

The redundancies were unsustainable and the relationship between staff salaries and the financial crisis was unclear, Mr Clark said.

‘‘As a public university our staff are funded from the recurrent budget; we’ve never had a relationship with the rises and falls of the stockmarket as to how we employ staff.’’

The university will consult staff at a meeting today.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2009, 03:20:40 am by costargh »

wombifat

  • Guest
Re: The Melbourne model is looking rather anorexic
« Reply #34 on: July 29, 2009, 04:18:12 pm »
0
secondly, in the US system, you can go on to graduate programs without actually completing a degree. For law you only need to complete two years. So it's all very different.
Two years of what? And is it the equivalent of a JD or LLB (or something else)?
(this has nothing to do with the debate, I'm just interested lol)

two years of anything as far as i know? I think you just need to do the LSAT and get good marks in that. and tbh I have no clue what the norm is I just know that that's what my dad did. It's called a LLB, but I don't think there's a huge difference between the JD and LLB. 

wilson

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Respect: 0
Letter published in the Age.
« Reply #35 on: July 29, 2009, 05:44:02 pm »
0
Quote
PETER Singer is undeniably right. Compared with the American system, our universities are overly preoccupied with vocation and profession.

I have studied in Australia and the US and have seen the value of an undergraduate program that favours education for education’s sake. I have also completed a bachelor of arts in addition to a bachelor of medicine. It was the former that provided me with a wide-ranging and far-reaching perspective on the world.

I once noticed scrawled on to a toilet paper dispenser at Melbourne University the words ‘‘arts degree - take one’’. I confess that my BA is my most cherished piece of toilet paper yet.

Dr Elliot Wollner, Caulfield

Moderator Note (costargh): This is a letter published in The Age in response to a previous article posted in this thread.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2009, 05:59:29 pm by costargh »

wilson

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Respect: 0
Re: Letter published in the Age.
« Reply #36 on: July 29, 2009, 05:48:20 pm »
0
It was a letter in response to the  article.