Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 11, 2024, 08:20:52 pm

Author Topic: Main Differences  (Read 4135 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

asa.hoshi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
  • Respect: +1
Main Differences
« on: October 30, 2007, 05:16:45 pm »
0
Hey Everyone!

I am so confused between a Part A essay and a Part B essay. My school virtually doesn't teach how to write a Part B essay. All my English teachers say its a "theme" based essay. What they mean is that you just write about themes in your paragraphs and don't talk about character developments or have separate paragraphs about the characters from your text.

Last year, a few high achieving students did really well in all sections of the English exam except for Part B.

Student 1:
TEXT 1 - 10
TEXT 2 - 6.5
Analysis - 8
POV - 8
SS - 41

Student 2:
TEXT 1 - 10
TEXT 2 - 6.5
Analysis - 10
POV - 9.5
SS - 45

I am no high achiever in English. But I seriously don't want a shit study score because I didn't know how to write a Part B essay properly. I'm not aiming for 40+ or antyhing. But I wanna do an "ok" job on the exam.

Btw, I'm doing 1984 & Inheritance for my texts in the exam. My teachers say 1984 is a great text for part B because it has so many themes. LOL. Thanks everyone.

Asa.Hoshi
I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER!!

Eriny

  • The lamp of enlightenment
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • *******
  • Posts: 2954
  • Respect: +100
Main Differences
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2007, 05:42:18 pm »
0
It means that you have to draw inferences from the text to the world itself. Part A is very much focussed on the motivations of the characters or the reasoning behind particular events in the book. Part B is more concerned with what ideas or values the writer is proposing to the reader through the characters and events in the book. You write them both essentially the same way, but on Part B, instead of saying things like "character X does Y because..." you say "Through character X and their action of Y, the writer conveys to the audience that..." The difference is subtle and often the topic alone will provide enough cues for your writing to shift to the appropriate perspective.

choc_bananas

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Respect: 0
Main Differences
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2007, 05:55:34 pm »
0
the number one way to ensure you are writing a part 2 is to answer the question!.. well thats my advice. :-)


failing that this might help... :-)

ENGLISH EXAM NOTES (PART 2 TEXT RESPONSE)

I would like to turn your attention to the first section of the English examination paper - Text Response - most particularly, the Part 2 text essay. As you know, there are two text essays required in the final examination. The Part 1 essay is the type of analytical essay that you have been writing since the early years of high school. To my mind, Part 2 is the more interesting essay, but many students find it the more challenging. Examination responses are, in the words of the Chief Examiner, ?often quite brilliant? while ?the less successful tend to generalise with a complete loss of text?. So I think it is a useful idea to use some of the next ten weeks to clearly identify in your own head what is required for a good Part 2 response. Let us begin ?.

What are the differences between Part 1 and Part 2 text essays?

To put it simply, Part 1 essays focus on the elements of structure, character, form, plot, setting, language and tone. Part 2 essay topics focus on how the text reflects social and cultural values, concepts, context, perspectives and implied views. One way that the differences can be perceived is by recognising that the two sections are different ways into the text. One is through a close examination of what is happening within the text, such as the interaction of character; and the other is looking at the text as a whole entity from outside, identifying what it says to you about particular ideas. The simple diagram below tries to illustrate this subtle difference in emphasis when studying your texts. Part 1 asks you to get inside the text and explore all its component parts, while Part 2 asks you to stand back, put all the parts together, and consider the overall meaning of the total text.
Part 1 essays ask you to separate the book into its component parts, to focus on the individual elements that blend together to make up the novel. On the other hand, Part 2 essays ask you to look at the text holistically - to decide how all the elements of Part 1 work together to create a particular meaning. It is here that you are consciously asking yourself - Why did the author write in this way? What is his purpose? What meaning is he communicating? What values are evident in his story? What is he saying about the world?
 


What do Part 2 essay topics look like? If you look at the VCE examination papers from recent years, you will become familiar with the types of questions asked for Part 2 Text Response. They are most often written from the perspective of the whole text, and they focus on a particular concept, value or context.

For example, these questions were on the 2006 paper ?
The Kite Runner ?The Kite Runner demonstrates that people are motivated more by self-interest than by honour.? Discuss.
The Wife of Martin Guerre ?This text shows that morality is meaningless without compassion.? Discuss.
I?m Not Scared ?I?m Not Scared demonstrates that a vast gap between wealth and poverty in a society generates corruption and violence.? Discuss.


What pitfalls are there in Part 2 essays?
The major error students make in their examination responses is to tackle the topic as if it were an issue essay, rather than a text essay. They write generalised responses that address the theme, but at the expense of the text. Let us look at the text The Quiet American for a moment. A Part 2 topic for this text could be:

?The Quiet American shows that it is not always best for a country to accept Western values.? Discuss
Instinctively, you are likely to agree with this statement. But why? Nowhere in the novel does Greene come out and state explicitly that he is against Western values in Indo-China, yet as readers we are keenly aware that this is the underlying message. How do we know this? ? the presentation of Western characters like Pyle and Granger who are so uncaring and disparaging about the local people and culture of Indo-China that we are positioned as readers to despise their values

? the weariness of the French Captain who wants to save the lives of his St Cyr colleagues and return home rather than fight in Indo China

? the pastoral vision of IndoChina as an agrarian society that is presented in the novel and appears at complete odds with the technology of a highly industrialised USA

? the presentation of Pyle as a rabid ideologue blinded to the inadequacies of his mentor York Harding who, in practical terms, only spent a few days in the country

? the death of innocents that occurs at the hands of Pyle ? and his callousness at being more comcerned for the state of his shoes than the loss of Indo-Chinese lives

? the stereotyping of the French/British presence as war weary and impassive, while the Americans appear as a blundering, blind force

Notice how you must go back to the text to identify all the examples and quotes that support your instincts that The Quiet American perceives western ideals as foolish and uninformed. The danger for some students is that they write a generalised discussion on western liberal democracy and fail to link it back specifically to the book. This is incorrect. In Part 2 essays, you use the text to evidence your discussion of the concept/value/perspective identified in the topic.

How do I write a Part 2 essay?
As with any essay, there are no absolutely right or wrong ways to write a Part 2 response. They can be written in many ways successfully. As in Part 1, the most important thing is to answer the question. However, perhaps I can give you a few ideas to tailor your writing more precisely to fit the Part 2 model. 1. Your introduction must address the concept/value/perspective identified in the topic. Define it clearly . Outline your interpretation. Don?t get caught up in textual detail in your introduction. Remember to phrase ideas in terms of the whole text.
2. Just as the topic uses the whole text approach e.g. ?The Quiet American shows ..? , so your answer should adopt the same pattern. Use phrases like ?this novel tells us that?, ?this film implies that?, ?Lantana addresses the issue of?, or talk about the intentions of the author/director ? ?Miller articulates his feelings on?, ?Sarah Watt uses the tracking shot to? and ?Greene identifies his own moral ambiguity when he ? ?.
3. Focus your topic sentences on some angle of the concept, or on the author/director?s intention. Use textual evidence in the paragraph to support your position in the topic sentence. Each paragraph may begin in a non-textual manner, but the body of the discussion refers in close detail to the text.

For example, here is the introduction and topic sentences for a Part 2 essay on The Quiet American - The Quiet American shows that it is not always best for a country to accept Western values. Discuss.
The Quiet American highlights the deadly consequences of imposing Western liberal ideology upon agrarian, peasant-based nations such as those like Indo-China. Graham Greene challenges the legitimacy of America?s foreign intervention during the 1950s which sought to use violence as a means of ?building a national democratic front?. Ultimately, the reader is positioned to view the Western ideals of liberty and democracy as ?isms and ocracies? or ?half-baked ideals? which are largely irrelevant to an ancient ?rice field? country. Greene stresses that to ?blunder? in and impose one?s ideals without looking at the facts is to do a lot of harm; it is one of the dilemmas of democracy that a small amount of good must be sacrificed for the sake of a much greater good. In writing this novel, Greene wishes us to question the morally expedient actions of the United States across the world. He seeks acknowledgement that action ?can be a most dangerous thing? when abstract political values are enforced upon a nation that is far removed from the values of the Western world.
Body paragraph 1 Western political ideals have little value to a south-east Asian country torn between French colonialism and independence.
Body paragraph 2 The inherent flaws in the application of Western ideas to Indo-China stem from the radically different cultural context of the East contrasted to the self-interested motivations of the United States.
Body paragraph 3 Greene shows that too much faith in Western idealism can have horrific consequences for those involved.
Body paragraph 4 Greene?s incessant focus on the ?innocence? of Pyle?s character is not an exoneration of his heinous actions but a comment on the culpability of the United States.
As you can see, Part 2 essays aren?t really difficult. They just require some practice. Make use of the ten weeks of third term to master this essay format, so that you can confidently tackle the task in the final examination.
b]History is the only laboratory we have in which to test the consequences of thought.[/b]
 - Etienne Gilson

maxleng

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 285
  • Respect: 0
Main Differences
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2007, 07:33:12 am »
0
i just remember to follow this:

explore abstract underlying notions which are at the core of the text and the social and/or cultural values embodied in a text which is stated in the examiners report.

Markos

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Respect: +1
Main Differences
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2007, 11:45:26 am »
0
My teacher has taught our class to write part 2 introductions using 2 paragraphs - the first to demonstrate your understanding of the broad issue relating it today's society and then the second paragraph to link the issue with the text and how the text deomnstrates/deals with the issue

I've heard very negative feedback on it as well as positive comments..

brendan

  • Guest
Main Differences
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2007, 12:45:38 pm »
0
Quote from: "childofbodom"
My teacher has taught our class to write part 2 introductions using 2 paragraphs - the first to demonstrate your understanding of the broad issue relating it today's society and then the second paragraph to link the issue with the text and how the text deomnstrates/deals with the issue

I've heard very negative feedback on it as well as positive comments..


first paragraph is unnecessary. always stay on topic and on task. second paragraph is fine. if you wanted to deal with teh value/broad issue generally in relation to today's society, then do it quickly in one or two sentences and that's it.

ninwa

  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8267
  • Respect: +1021
Main Differences
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2007, 12:48:32 pm »
0
yeah, I've found you don't really need to relate to society. I never have, and the sample "high scoring" essays on examiners reports generally don't either.

I approach part 1 and part 2 essays the exact same way - by answering the question. I think that's the best thing to do, rather than worry about how to answer a part 2 essay as opposed to part 1 etc etc
ExamPro enquiries to [email protected]

melanie.dee

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +1
Main Differences
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2007, 12:57:12 pm »
0
agreed. if you answer the question, you won't have any problems. the questions involves themes, ideas of a larger scale.. if you address these, then you are addressing the part 2 part of the question.

Markos

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Respect: +1
Main Differences
« Reply #8 on: November 01, 2007, 01:27:37 pm »
0
I'll give an example of an introduction that my teacher said was spot on for a part 2 text response

Hard Times demonstrates the importance of imagination and beauty in the lives of adults as well as the lives of children. Discuss.

Imagination and beauty are integral to the life of an individual as they develop compassionate character and promote active and liberal thought. In a rapidly growing industrial world, a tendency to forget the necessity of fancy and wonder in life becomes a problem as effects on both young and old people can leave a life in ruin. With a life based purely on facts, with no thought outside calculated reasoning, existence is likely to turn dull, glum and morose.
   Charles Dickens paints a sorry picture of Industrial England in his novel, Hard Times. He makes use of a fictional industrial town, Coketown, and its populace to expose the flaws of life filled with ?fact and fact alone?. The lives of characters living in this town contrast life of pure calculation with life of imagination and beauty, and supports Dickens? encouragement of a life outside the rule ?two and two are four, and nothing over?.

I have a feeling its a little long, compared with a lot of part 2 intros I've read (that don't use this 2 paragraph thing). It took me just over 10 minutes to write

Odette

  • Guest
Main Differences
« Reply #9 on: November 01, 2007, 01:33:46 pm »
0
Quote from: "childofbodom"
I'll give an example of an introduction that my teacher said was spot on for a part 2 text response

Hard Times demonstrates the importance of imagination and beauty in the lives of adults as well as the lives of children. Discuss.

Imagination and beauty are integral to the life of an individual as they develop compassionate character and promote active and liberal thought. In a rapidly growing industrial world, a tendency to forget the necessity of fancy and wonder in life becomes a problem as effects on both young and old people can leave a life in ruin. With a life based purely on facts, with no thought outside calculated reasoning, existence is likely to turn dull, glum and morose.
   Charles Dickens paints a sorry picture of Industrial England in his novel, Hard Times. He makes use of a fictional industrial town, Coketown, and its populace to expose the flaws of life filled with ?fact and fact alone?. The lives of characters living in this town contrast life of pure calculation with life of imagination and beauty, and supports Dickens? encouragement of a life outside the rule ?two and two are four, and nothing over?.

I have a feeling its a little long, compared with a lot of part 2 intros I've read (that don't use this 2 paragraph thing). It took me just over 10 minutes to write


Did you mean fantasy or fancy?
Nice introduction, I don't think that's necessary though..That's just what I think :)

Markos

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Respect: +1
Main Differences
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2007, 01:37:54 pm »
0
"fancy" lol, maybe I should've put that in quote marks

EDIT: and after re-reading it I realised my phrasing is appalling :S

Odette

  • Guest
Main Differences
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2007, 01:41:41 pm »
0
Quote from: "childofbodom"
"fancy" lol, maybe I should've put that in quote marks


Hehe ok :)