Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 27, 2025, 09:47:47 am
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Dekoyl's Questions  (Read 14518 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #45 on: March 24, 2009, 07:17:25 am »
0
lol indeed :P
Logged

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #46 on: April 01, 2009, 07:55:16 pm »
0
By solving:

show that:


I don't really know what they want me to solve.
=\
Logged

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #47 on: April 01, 2009, 08:15:41 pm »
0
I'm not the best with matrices due too inexperience. But I remember that this is a proof of the formula for the inverse of a 2x2 matrix. So basically try to set up 4 simultaneous equations that involve the 8 variables. 8-4=4 so you should be able to find x in terms of only the variables in the first matrix... y in terms of only the variables in the first matrix... and so on. Once that is found, u know the second matrix but that second matrix is the inverse matrix since the product is the identity matrix.
Logged
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #48 on: April 01, 2009, 08:19:40 pm »
0
Quote from: kamil9876 on April 01, 2009, 08:15:41 pm
I'm not the best with matrices due too inexperience. But I remember that this is a proof of the formula for the inverse of a 2x2 matrix. So basically try to set up 4 simultaneous equations that involve the 8 variables. 8-4=4 so you should be able to find x in terms of only the variables in the first matrix... y in terms of only the variables in the first matrix... and so on. Once that is found, u know the second matrix but that second matrix is the inverse matrix since the product is the identity matrix.
Thanks Kamil! I'll try set those things up.
Logged

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #49 on: April 02, 2009, 01:00:51 am »
0
Sorries but I don't fully understand this property of a determinant.

- Replacing a row of a matrix by the sum of the row itself(huh?) and a scalar multiple of another row has no effect on the determinant.


Thanks :(
Logged

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #50 on: April 02, 2009, 01:01:44 am »
0
If you have row A and row B, then you can replace row A with row , where k is a scalar.
Logged

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #51 on: April 02, 2009, 01:03:25 am »
0
Quote from: /0 on April 02, 2009, 01:01:44 am
If you have row A and row B, then you can replace row A with row , where k is a scalar.
Ah that's much more clear.

Thanks /0 =]
Logged

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #52 on: May 05, 2009, 09:03:24 pm »
0
Ressurection. =D

Q: How do we go about finding the surface normal of a non-flat surface (so vector normal) of a surface with equation ?

I first arranged it so I had the equation in the form then I'm not sure what to do :(

Thanks
Logged

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #53 on: May 05, 2009, 09:05:30 pm »
0
What's ?
Logged

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #54 on: May 05, 2009, 09:07:53 pm »
0
Quote from: /0 on May 05, 2009, 09:05:30 pm
What's ?
Oh sorry :P

What I meant with was an equation that is in terms of x and y so maybe
Logged

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #55 on: May 05, 2009, 09:31:52 pm »
0
Wait is the vector normal to :
i jk?

Thanks
« Last Edit: May 05, 2009, 09:37:08 pm by dekoyl »
Logged

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Dekoyl's Questions
« Reply #56 on: May 05, 2009, 11:35:18 pm »
0
yes. the gradient vector is perpendicular to the tangent vector, this can be shown with the chain rule. =]
Logged
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up