He doesn't deny "climate change" per se. It's a fact.
But what can
policy do about it?
He understands that the
policy debate is two-sided. As
periwinkle linked to:
http://www.devilskitchen.me.uk/2009/11/crudgate-why-this-cant-be-swept-under.htmlYou only have to read a relatively liberal economics blog (Freakonomics) and the authors' book: SuperFreakonomics to get a very good counter-arguing viewpoint on man-caused climate change (perhaps more credible to a wider audience because it's not written by extremists). They believe that targeting CO2 is silly for various reasons.
(and then he talks about evolution, so you have the order wrong -- I don't see anything wrong with what he is saying here, he's just against a system where people are forced into a particular curriculum, and that the market should take control of it. It's not a fundamentalist motivation, it's a free-market motivation.)