Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 04, 2026, 12:54:38 pm

Author Topic: UMAT 2010 Question Thread  (Read 42818 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #150 on: July 11, 2010, 07:11:27 pm »
0
ok whats up with this question. Its says "Participation rates for those with bone tumours were not significantly different in the different age groups compared to brain and tissue tumours." meaning participation levels for different age groups and diff tumors, more or less the same in each catagory of ages. and the second sentence "Over the past 50 years, survival has improved more in children with cancer than in older adolescents and young adults." because 46% of those <16 participated helping confirm A).But answer is D)

btw i may have completely misread the question and gone off on a tangent because im reallly tired.
but yeah.

andy456

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 951
  • Respect: +12
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #151 on: July 11, 2010, 08:04:03 pm »
0
ok whats up with this question. Its says "Participation rates for those with bone tumours were not significantly different in the different age groups compared to brain and tissue tumours." meaning participation levels for different age groups and diff tumors, more or less the same in each catagory of ages. and the second sentence "Over the past 50 years, survival has improved more in children with cancer than in older adolescents and young adults." because 46% of those <16 participated helping confirm A).But answer is D)

btw i may have completely misread the question and gone off on a tangent because im reallly tired.
but yeah.

Im guessing its because it doesnt say that the survival rate has improved because they attended clinical trials.
VCE 2010: Eng 42 | Legal 49 | Chem 37 | MM 34 | Indo SL 33 |
ATAR: 97.45
 
2011: Bachelor of Arts Monash University
2012: Bachelor of Commerce?? Please!!

-

  • Guest
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #152 on: July 11, 2010, 08:54:36 pm »
0
MORE SECTION 3 QUESTIONS NOW!

pooshwaltzer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Respect: 0
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #153 on: July 11, 2010, 09:17:48 pm »
0
MORE SECTION 3 QUESTIONS NOW!

In 1928 the Republic Party used a telephone survey, what was then considered cutting edge technology, to conduct a sample poll of voting public sentiments in relation to their preferential choices in the upcoming general election. Party members and delegates would ring residents within the phone register and simply ask their party preferences.

To ensure national consistency, poll was carried out across continental United States with the exception of the Mid-West which had yet to develop its telephony and communications infrastructure. Analysts decided that the impact of such an exclusion is statistically insignificant given that the region represent barely 5% of the aggregate pool of eligible voters.

THE FINDING: 95% of those polled indicated their preference for the Republican party thereby forecasting a landslide Republican victory.

THE RESULT: Later that year, Democrat Herbert Hoover was sworn into presidency following an unprecedented and largely uncontested majority in the actual polls.

What went wrong?

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #154 on: July 11, 2010, 09:53:20 pm »
0
MORE SECTION 3 QUESTIONS NOW!

In 1928 the Republic Party used a telephone survey, what was then considered cutting edge technology, to conduct a sample poll of voting public sentiments in relation to their preferential choices in the upcoming general election. Party members and delegates would ring residents within the phone register and simply ask their party preferences.

To ensure national consistency, poll was carried out across continental United States with the exception of the Mid-West which had yet to develop its telephony and communications infrastructure. Analysts decided that the impact of such an exclusion is statistically insignificant given that the region represent barely 5% of the aggregate pool of eligible voters.

THE FINDING: 95% of those polled indicated their preference for the Republican party thereby forecasting a landslide Republican victory.

THE RESULT: Later that year, Democrat Herbert Hoover was sworn into presidency following an unprecedented and largely uncontested majority in the actual polls.

What went wrong?

C

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #155 on: July 12, 2010, 08:21:37 pm »
0
ok whats up with this question. Its says "Participation rates for those with bone tumours were not significantly different in the different age groups compared to brain and tissue tumours." meaning participation levels for different age groups and diff tumors, more or less the same in each catagory of ages. and the second sentence "Over the past 50 years, survival has improved more in children with cancer than in older adolescents and young adults." because 46% of those <16 participated helping confirm A).But answer is D)

btw i may have completely misread the question and gone off on a tangent because im reallly tired.
but yeah.

Im guessing its because it doesnt say that the survival rate has improved because they attended clinical trials.
but b/c like 50% of kids did it and later it says more improvement was shown in kids as opposed to adults who didnt participate more in trials,
so we still cant assume so?

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #156 on: July 16, 2010, 06:40:04 pm »
0
To anyone struggling in true/false statement questions (like me :P), it may be worth reading up on 'Paradoxes'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox#Explanation_of_the_paradox_and_variants
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Card_paradox
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #157 on: July 17, 2010, 07:00:24 pm »
0
Could someone explain how they would have approached this question:

pooshwaltzer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Respect: 0
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #158 on: July 17, 2010, 11:37:22 pm »
0
B --> A --> E --> C --> D

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #159 on: July 18, 2010, 12:15:34 am »
0
Looks like you may have got that one wrong Poosh  :D

*Edit - I chose a when I did that question cause from the other four one star has a circle on the left, one on the right, one on the bottom left, and one on the bottom right; leaving a as the odd one out with a circle at the top.

Obviously got lucky though, I find it so hard to work out where these patterns start and end, so I usually just resort to
3-2/symmetry..
« Last Edit: July 18, 2010, 12:25:41 am by Stroodle »

samiira

  • Guest
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #160 on: July 18, 2010, 01:13:40 am »
0
do u guys finish the drills on time? i cant!
All but section 1. Well I guess it's because I hate section one and I always get up and do something else while I'm meant to be doing the drill... LOL


i agree wif u one dat one.. section one kills me.. and i cant stand da massive amounts of reading

EDIT: @liv
Lol that's stupid medentry for you :knuppel2:

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #161 on: July 18, 2010, 10:08:40 am »
0
B --> A --> E --> C --> D
A is the middle lol

sir0004

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • Respect: +1
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #162 on: July 19, 2010, 07:00:29 pm »
0
Order is C B A E D. There are two circles in all, in some patterns these are covered while not so in others. The movement of one of the balls starting from C is half a turn clockwise each turn. The other ball moves moves anti clockwise 1, clockwise 2, anti clockwise 3 and finally clockwise 4 times. 

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #163 on: July 19, 2010, 07:13:11 pm »
0
Well, the problem is how you managed to choose position 1. I mean the pattern of course is apparent after you know the order.

sir0004

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • Respect: +1
Re: UMAT 2010 Question Thread
« Reply #164 on: July 19, 2010, 09:18:42 pm »
0
I didn't know the order, I had to figure it out from scratch. It did take about double the time that a section 3 question in the real UMAT is meant to take (but it's one of the harder ones). First thing I saw was the presence of one ball at exterior edge in all of the shapes and another ball either in the exterior or 'in-between' edges. The one that was at the outer edge is likely to be moving either clockwise or anticlockwise, and the number of turns it takes can be same or increase/decrease. However, having done countless number of these questions when I did the UMAT last year, I know that, most often, the FIRST turn is only one movement. The ball at the 'interior-edges' is not found throughout the shape (i.e. it is isolated at the top half of the shape). Thus, it is reasonable to think that it is moving only one turn at a time throughout. After identifying these, the problem becomes easy, and you just try different combinations till you find one that follows this logic/trend.