Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 22, 2026, 02:45:09 am

Author Topic: .  (Read 60401 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #120 on: July 28, 2010, 08:19:16 pm »
0
it was:the same number were hands free and were on mobiles..

i put the one that it is concentrating on the road requires more than just having free hands :S
thats wat i put

i swear i had done that question before :S

yeah, it was on medentry, and i fkd it up last time lol, so i remebered just in case it came up again.  lucky me. :P

medentry actually had a lot of topics that were identical to the umat passages.
too bad the q's were different.
yay im not going insane :P

yeah i agree
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #121 on: July 28, 2010, 08:19:25 pm »
0
DNA question.  answer was person 3 yeah?

another medentry freebie I hope!

and was it test tube 7?  for the one ppm?
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #122 on: July 28, 2010, 08:19:32 pm »
0
oh, and worst part of the umat for me..........

flip to the last page, and there's more pick the middle. WTF.

i was smarting.  dirty bastards!
omg yess, last page and then pick the middle damnnnnnn i guessed the pick the middle one with the hearts and sunflowers watever lol

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #123 on: July 28, 2010, 08:19:58 pm »
0
DNA question.  answer was person 3 yeah?

another medentry freebie I hope!
YAY I GOT PERSON 3 TOO HI FIVE

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #124 on: July 28, 2010, 08:20:22 pm »
0
i think i put 3 lol but i honestly cant remember if i put 3 or 2
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #125 on: July 28, 2010, 08:20:58 pm »
0
DNA question.  answer was person 3 yeah?

another medentry freebie I hope!
YAY I GOT PERSON 3 TOO HI FIVE

Yeah I got 3 too :)

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #126 on: July 28, 2010, 08:21:49 pm »
0
And test tube 7 ftw :D

10weid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +1
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #127 on: July 28, 2010, 08:22:09 pm »
0
it was:the same number were hands free and were on mobiles..

i put the one that it is concentrating on the road requires more than just having free hands :S
thats wat i put

i swear i had done that question before :S

yeah, it was on medentry, and i fkd it up last time lol, so i remebered just in case it came up again.  lucky me. :P

medentry actually had a lot of topics that were identical to the umat passages.
too bad the q's were different.

BUTTT it said that amongst ppl hoo crashed, it made no difference whther they used handsfree or not,
meaning that apporx equal number of those hoo crashed wud have been using handsfree, no?
2009: Mathematical Methods CAS 49 | Biology 49
2010: Chemistry 47 | Further Mathematics 48 | English 42 | Specialist Mathematics 43
2010 VCE ATAR 99.65
UMAT: 98th %ile
2012: MBBS I - Monash

*Anyone requiring VCE aid, or HELP GETTING INTO MEDICINE, please don't hesitate to PM me :)*

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #128 on: July 28, 2010, 08:22:45 pm »
0
DNA question.  answer was person 3 yeah?

another medentry freebie I hope!
YAY I GOT PERSON 3 TOO HI FIVE

Yeah I got 3 too :)
And test tube 7 ftw :D
oh god i had absolutely no idea for that question i put down 10 :(:(

10weid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +1
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #129 on: July 28, 2010, 08:22:50 pm »
0
definintely test rube 7, and defininetly child 3
2009: Mathematical Methods CAS 49 | Biology 49
2010: Chemistry 47 | Further Mathematics 48 | English 42 | Specialist Mathematics 43
2010 VCE ATAR 99.65
UMAT: 98th %ile
2012: MBBS I - Monash

*Anyone requiring VCE aid, or HELP GETTING INTO MEDICINE, please don't hesitate to PM me :)*

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #130 on: July 28, 2010, 08:24:21 pm »
0
it was:the same number were hands free and were on mobiles..

i put the one that it is concentrating on the road requires more than just having free hands :S
thats wat i put

i swear i had done that question before :S

yeah, it was on medentry, and i fkd it up last time lol, so i remebered just in case it came up again.  lucky me. :P

medentry actually had a lot of topics that were identical to the umat passages.
too bad the q's were different.

BUTTT it said that amongst ppl hoo crashed, it made no difference whther they used handsfree or not,
meaning that apporx equal number of those hoo crashed wud have been using handsfree, no?

^ well you dont know the sample they used so i dont think you can make that assumption
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

10weid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +1
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #131 on: July 28, 2010, 08:26:51 pm »
0
^ u dont needa know the sample, u just needa know that if the device used makes no difference, a large enough group would demonstrate the quality of having approx equal numbers of both
2009: Mathematical Methods CAS 49 | Biology 49
2010: Chemistry 47 | Further Mathematics 48 | English 42 | Specialist Mathematics 43
2010 VCE ATAR 99.65
UMAT: 98th %ile
2012: MBBS I - Monash

*Anyone requiring VCE aid, or HELP GETTING INTO MEDICINE, please don't hesitate to PM me :)*

Greggler

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #132 on: July 28, 2010, 08:26:59 pm »
0
yeah. obviously the umat must recycle questions/question stems. because as i was reading a lot of it seemed quite familiair haha

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #133 on: July 28, 2010, 08:27:55 pm »
0
card shuffling question was awful.  i guessed 6 of hearts.  no idea why...

and i can't remember the cholesterol question.  anyone can you rejog my memory>
« Last Edit: July 28, 2010, 08:31:37 pm by stonecold »
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #134 on: July 28, 2010, 08:28:14 pm »
0
it was:the same number were hands free and were on mobiles..

i put the one that it is concentrating on the road requires more than just having free hands :S
thats wat i put

i swear i had done that question before :S

yeah, it was on medentry, and i fkd it up last time lol, so i remebered just in case it came up again.  lucky me. :P

medentry actually had a lot of topics that were identical to the umat passages.
too bad the q's were different.

BUTTT it said that amongst ppl hoo crashed, it made no difference whther they used handsfree or not,
meaning that apporx equal number of those hoo crashed wud have been using handsfree, no?

It might not of made any difference, but still 3 ppl in their sample could have been handsfree, and 5 could have been holding their phones.