Sigh.
I am no Islamic, but I am pretty sure Sharia law, the Niqab, and Jihad are terms which have been defamed into being associated with negative connotations
These are terms that have been around for 1300 years. Same terms, same ideology. This "Jihad" that you mildly speak of means "holy war". Or more precisely: It means the legal, compulsory, communal effort to expand the territories ruled by Muslims at the expense of territories ruled by non-Muslims. This is a core tenet of the Q'uran and you don't need to be an Islamic scholar to know that. This means death, destruction and chaos.
as a result of minority groups claiming to be Islamic
I loled at this point. You do realize that of almost every terror group fighting in the name of Islam, hardly any have been condemned by the mainstream Islamic community? Figures by Pew suggest that support for terror is high (up to 60% in Jordan and Pakistan) in the Arab world. It may frighten you, but what you call the minority, is actually, according to data and statistics, the majority.
and further exploded by the media.
Okay. I have my problems with media bias too. But blaming the media on Islamaphobia (a ludicrous nonexistent phenomena) is well, ludicrous. You're basically saying that the media rather than 9/11 is responsible for the ambivalent feelings toward the Muslim world.
I have 0 knowledge of what the Koran endorses,
thanks for clearing that up
Sharia law on the other hand isn't all that bad.
You mean like imposing laws such as those that limit daughters' inheritance to half the portion of sons, and others according to which a woman's testimony counted for half that of a man. Yes, this can be found in other religious too - but the fundamentalist version of this is only in practice by Muslims.
but hypothetically if it was the will of Allah for one to do well in their academics, someone striving to achieve good scores would be involved in a Jihad.
If that were indeed the will of Allah, then Inshallah there would be peace in the Middle East.
The principles behind it are not all that different from our western ideologies.
Ah yes. Democracy, human rights, capitalism and treating women as something other than animals comes straight from the Q'uran
Niqab/Hijab, if a nun was walking around in a veil, or a buddhist monk walked around in robes, there wouldn't be complaints.
Irrelevant argument. Nuns aren't trying to kill anyone
They are in Iran, that is a cultural factor, hence they can base their toys on that culture as well.
No - I keep on mentioning that the motivation is purely religious and ideological. The Niqab is a cultural relic limited to the Arabian peninsula that has spread worldwide with the advent of the Wahabbi movement. The Persians don't historically wear niqabs.
The blokes behind it may have that in mind, but a young girl in any country will look at a doll in the same way, just a figure that allows them to escape from the real world, letting their imagination control the moment.
Or there are darker forces at play. Ever wonder what makes a teen girl strap on a suicide vest and to kill herself and innocent civilians?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/2621776/Iraq-police-catch-teenage-girl-in-suicide-bomber-vest.htmlNow you know.