Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 24, 2026, 01:01:58 pm

Author Topic: Integration  (Read 10621 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

d0minicz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 997
  • Respect: +6
Re: Integration
« Reply #30 on: April 07, 2009, 03:39:40 pm »
0
Ye NE2000 is right
Doctor of Medicine (UoM)

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Integration
« Reply #31 on: April 07, 2009, 10:33:27 pm »
0





That is incorrect, integrating inverse circular functions require the use of 'integration by parts'. This is not in the syllabus of SM.

However, as 'fun' activity because you love math, you might want to try differentiating , and hence find an antiderivative of
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

d0minicz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 997
  • Respect: +6
Re: Integration
« Reply #32 on: April 08, 2009, 06:05:56 pm »
0
Find the volume of the region bounded by , , , about .
thx.
Doctor of Medicine (UoM)

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: Integration
« Reply #33 on: April 08, 2009, 06:15:37 pm »
0
Revoling around y=16 eh. We're not used to that, however we can turn this into a situation that we are used to, namely y=0. The way we do that is by translating the graph 16 units down so that the axis of rotation is y=0.

So the graph u want to deal with now is:


Now you know one of the terminals is x=0. The other is found by subbing y=16 into the OLD equation or subbing in y=0 into the NEW equation(the latter is a bit more complicated to justify, it's basically due to translation of 16 units down)
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Integration
« Reply #34 on: April 09, 2009, 03:39:01 pm »
0





That is incorrect, integrating inverse circular functions require the use of 'integration by parts'. This is not in the syllabus of SM.

However, as 'fun' activity because you love math, you might want to try differentiating , and hence find an antiderivative of

Is it (although the question wasn't directed at me, couldn't help but try)

And what's the basic idea behind integration by parts?
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Integration
« Reply #35 on: April 09, 2009, 04:16:20 pm »
0





That is incorrect, integrating inverse circular functions require the use of 'integration by parts'. This is not in the syllabus of SM.

However, as 'fun' activity because you love math, you might want to try differentiating , and hence find an antiderivative of

Is it (although the question wasn't directed at me, couldn't help but try)

And what's the basic idea behind integration by parts?

It's a manipulation of the product rule basically (reverse product rule perhaps), whilst the substitution technique is basically reverse chain rule. You might even be able to just figure it out yourself on how to do it actually.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Integration
« Reply #36 on: April 09, 2009, 08:32:22 pm »
0






With this, you can integrate the product of two functions, such as
The art of mastering integration by parts is choosing what is u and what is v, which you learn in first year. In this case, let and
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Integration
« Reply #37 on: April 10, 2009, 06:27:50 pm »
0
Thanks Mao
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

d0minicz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 997
  • Respect: +6
Re: Integration
« Reply #38 on: April 11, 2009, 02:41:54 pm »
0
Find the volume of the region bounded by , , about .
Also, waht is the Disk Formula?
thansk
« Last Edit: April 11, 2009, 02:55:51 pm by d0minicz »
Doctor of Medicine (UoM)

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Integration
« Reply #39 on: April 11, 2009, 03:22:15 pm »
0
incorrect mathematics

disregard that, misread question
« Last Edit: April 11, 2009, 08:30:41 pm by dcc »

d0minicz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 997
  • Respect: +6
Re: Integration
« Reply #40 on: April 11, 2009, 03:27:26 pm »
0
Hey the answer says
are they wrong?
also i need help on questions where they ask ; "revolving around x=3" , instead of "revolving around the x-axis"
how would i approach these? thanks.
Doctor of Medicine (UoM)

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Integration
« Reply #41 on: April 11, 2009, 03:31:24 pm »
0
Hey the answer says
are they wrong?
also i need help on questions where they ask ; "revolving around x=3" , instead of "revolving around the x-axis"
how would i approach these? thanks.
check here: http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,9192.msg120718.html#msg120718
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
« Last Edit: April 11, 2009, 03:51:44 pm by ed_saifa »
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

d0minicz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 997
  • Respect: +6
Re: Integration
« Reply #43 on: April 11, 2009, 04:14:23 pm »
0
Find the volume of region within the parabola and between and the y-axis, about the y-axis.
thank you
Doctor of Medicine (UoM)

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri