Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

December 19, 2025, 12:21:31 pm

Author Topic: Well that was fun!  (Read 21116 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rzak

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Respect: -2
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #45 on: November 07, 2011, 03:28:57 pm »
0
howd everyone draw the regression line? just the normal way? did we have to give any points?

Well it wasn't a regression line. Btw did people section the points 4/3/4?

well then what was it? after you section it you join your points and move it 1/3rd...

geoff_821

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 109
  • Respect: +4
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #46 on: November 07, 2011, 03:29:29 pm »
0
if it was out of two you might get one, but consequentials are usually only when the thing you found wrong was a question on it's own, and then you used it in the next question, but in this case i dont think "find the ratio of volumes" or w.e. was a question

we had to find the height, and we were given ratio of radius's
 the next question asked to find the volume of it, so u needed the height for it.
i guess il get it if im lucky

rzak

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Respect: -2
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #47 on: November 07, 2011, 03:31:23 pm »
0
howd everyone draw the regression line? just the normal way? did we have to give any points?

Well it wasn't a regression line. Btw did people section the points 4/3/4?

http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/mathematics/further/pastexams/2006/2006furmath2-w.pdf

look at question 3. then go and look at the assesment report, it was pretty much the same question as today

redgreenblue

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Respect: 0
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #48 on: November 07, 2011, 03:34:22 pm »
0
Lame paper. Hopefully the cut off is decreased, but messed up a lot of the bearings. Didn't think it was fair to be making comments about the relationship in the core module of age for any age group other than < 19 year olds. They all looked like the didn't have a very definitive pattern. Oh well.
2009 - VET Information Technology [32]

Goals for 2011:
English [35], Further[40+], Methods[35], Specialist [30], Physics[30]

Tashi

  • Guest
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #49 on: November 07, 2011, 03:41:09 pm »
0
howd everyone draw the regression line? just the normal way? did we have to give any points?

Well it wasn't a regression line. Btw did people section the points 4/3/4?

http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/mathematics/further/pastexams/2006/2006furmath2-w.pdf

look at question 3. then go and look at the assesment report, it was pretty much the same question as today

Wait is a three median line also a regression line? lol

Anyway, i just did the moving ruler up a third towards the middle point thing.

Natters

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 346
  • Respect: +1
  • School: Mow
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #50 on: November 07, 2011, 03:42:04 pm »
0
no, big difference
regression=least squares= the sum of the squares of each residual is minimised
3 median = shitty guess that you can't rely on

Tashi

  • Guest
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #51 on: November 07, 2011, 03:45:40 pm »
0
no, big difference
regression=least squares= the sum of the squares of each residual is minimised
3 median = shitty guess that you can't rely on

Eh, well some people in the other thread are saying they calculated the regression line. The question asked for three median...

chemkid_23

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +6
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #52 on: November 07, 2011, 03:47:12 pm »
0
if it was out of two you might get one, but consequentials are usually only when the thing you found wrong was a question on it's own, and then you used it in the next question, but in this case i dont think "find the ratio of volumes" or w.e. was a question

we had to find the height, and we were given ratio of radius's
 the next question asked to find the volume of it, so u needed the height for it.
i guess il get it if im lucky

i guessed the height and used this value to find V (was running out of time). So would that give me consequential marks??

lizzy1994

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Respect: 0
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #53 on: November 07, 2011, 03:51:24 pm »
0
The question that asked you to mark the X on the three dots, was a "3 median line" question, not regression!

Wisdumb

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Macleod College
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #54 on: November 07, 2011, 03:58:11 pm »
0
I have to say I am thoroughly dissapointed with my effort today... I understood how to go about answering all the questions that I was allocated, yet as I look back now I can pinpoint so many silly mistakes that I made. I guess thats what exams do to you, hoping I can manage a 55/60 now.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2011, 04:00:03 pm by Wisdumb »

rzak

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Respect: -2
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #55 on: November 07, 2011, 04:03:14 pm »
0
no, big difference
regression=least squares= the sum of the squares of each residual is minimised
3 median = shitty guess that you can't rely on

Eh, well some people in the other thread are saying they calculated the regression line. The question asked for three median...

yeh i didnt do regression, did 4,3,4 then joined upper and lower and moved 1/3, it was all  so messy though because 1/3 was so close

my bad mixed up regression and median :P did the right one though!

colgate

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #56 on: November 07, 2011, 04:40:54 pm »
0
Is it alright for the median line to divide it into 3/5/3  then shift a third to middle?
or does it have to be 4/3/4

grosry

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
  • School: St Joseph's College
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #57 on: November 07, 2011, 05:17:22 pm »
+1
i love not reading the questions correctly... last question of matrices, i did year one not two, arhh!!
and some of those networks questionssss.... WTF!!

Tashi

  • Guest
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #58 on: November 07, 2011, 05:18:25 pm »
0
Is it alright for the median line to divide it into 3/5/3  then shift a third to middle?
or does it have to be 4/3/4

Hmmm I think they're meant to be pretty much equal.

Natters

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 346
  • Respect: +1
  • School: Mow
Re: Well that was fun!
« Reply #59 on: November 07, 2011, 05:55:55 pm »
0
Is it alright for the median line to divide it into 3/5/3  then shift a third to middle?
or does it have to be 4/3/4
theyre meant to be "as even as possible" with the two on the outer sides being equal
if you divided it 3/5/3 then i think theyd mark that wrong, though im never sure about these things now