Exam Thoughts & Review

[monkeywantsabanana]

What did people say for the question where it asked how the biopsychosocial frameowork changed the way mental health professionals diagnosed…or something like that

hollistic?

I couldn't figure out the two marks so i wrote 'holistic approach' and an essay.

[pas0005]

i said that it provided a hollistic view and therefore viewed the person as a whole. that question was confusing

[pas0005]

now that i think about it i think for some weird reason i went on about the stress response. I'm not sure I can barely remember anything about it

I think i screwed up that tantrum because i said

s=tantrum
r=ignore child's tantrum
r-negative reinforcement.

[REBORN]

Reinforcement won't reduce the frequency of the tantrums :/

[pas0005]

sorry i meant c= negative reinforcement

[Anon123]

sorry i meant c= negative reinforcement

lol

if the child throws a tantrum, and you reinforce that behaviour, you are increasing the frequency

[pas0005]

sorry negative punishment. mind my current brain deadness!!

[Anon123]

sorry negative punishment. mind my current brain deadness!!

Yeah, methods tomorrow will be a killer

[ProtonStar]

I miss the days of 2009... they never had this kind of ambiguous crap in a Psychology exam...

[Analog]

Discrim Stimulus: Saying No to child
Response: tantrum
Consequence: response cost, take away toys
would my stimulus be wrong???

[jaydee]

i assumed the stimulus could be almost anything since they didnt give a specific context, but im guessing R would be the tantrum and C would be a positive or negative punishment

[REBORN]

Did anyone copy the MCQ three phase model of operant conditioning?

I made sure I spelt dis-crim-inative right :p

Btw hope you guys didn't get tricked by MCQ 14! Dr Brown is the NEUTRAL stimulus - not the CONDITIONED!

[pas0005]

for the extended i did operational hypothesis, iv then operationalized iv, then dv, operationalized dv. I said that the hypothesis was supported and that it can be concluded that reinforcement effects learning. then said it was also statistically significant.and then i said it was an independent groups design which may confound with the results due to individual differences and it can be countered with matched-participants design by grouping the participants according to age, gender and intelligence. and i said that the maths teacher may impose an experimenter effect which can be managed by double blind procedure. oh and i said it cant be generalised because the sample was a convenience sample and was therefore not representative of the population.


how many marks do you reckon this response will get? was i even supposed to operationalize the dv and iv?

[D_m3]

If I wrote the IV, DV and hypothesis, how many marks is that worth? :/

Your guess is as good as all of ours I think but in my opinion I think it's

1 mark for IV
1 mark for operationalised IV
1mark for DV
1 mark for operationalised DV
2 marks for Hypothesis (Population + correct variables)

1 mark for accept/reject hypothesis and why(statistical significance)
1 mark for confounding variable
1 mark for control of confounding variable
1 mark for for conclusion and generalisations made but then i said no generalisations 'cus the sample was convenient...

I hope it was this, exactly what i did

[NuclearTime]

Hopefully this works... PDF of the Multiple Choice as the quality is impossible to view on websites due to the size I have it. :/