How did everyone go?! Thoughts?

[BoredSatan]

for the other expenses calculation..

did we have to remember to included the stock write down and stock gain from before.. cause thats A LONG WAY BACK..

cause i completely forgot and just did GP-NP... -1 mark?

I didnt, and not many people did. That question was definitely not worth only 1 mark, shoulda been at least 2...

no we should be happy its only 1.. otherwise we would lose 2 for not including

[molllz]

for the other expenses calculation..

did we have to remember to included the stock write down and stock gain from before.. cause thats A LONG WAY BACK..

cause i completely forgot and just did GP-NP... -1 mark?

I didnt, and not many people did. That question was definitely not worth only 1 mark, shoulda been at least 2...



wait did we have to include the stock gain??

no we should be happy its only 1.. otherwise we would lose 2 for not including

[molllz]

for the other expenses calculation..

did we have to remember to included the stock write down and stock gain from before.. cause thats A LONG WAY BACK..

cause i completely forgot and just did GP-NP... -1 mark?

I didnt, and not many people did. That question was definitely not worth only 1 mark, shoulda been at least 2...

no we should be happy its only 1.. otherwise we would lose 2 for not including

are you sure we had to include the stock gain?

[soggie]

for the other expenses calculation..

did we have to remember to included the stock write down and stock gain from before.. cause thats A LONG WAY BACK..

cause i completely forgot and just did GP-NP... -1 mark?

I didnt, and not many people did. That question was definitely not worth only 1 mark, shoulda been at least 2...

no we should be happy its only 1.. otherwise we would lose 2 for not including

are you sure we had to include the stock gain?

It you had to include the stock gain, then you also had to include the stock write down under gross profit, and you also had to deduct the sales return from sales to make 'net sales'...
there is no way VCAA were intending for all of the information derived in 1.1.1 to be carried forward into the other expense question for only 1 mark. Anyone who did it the way it with or without this information will get the mark

[Anon123]

The answer is NO, you were not supposed to carry forward that information.

I did - but my friend said he did another exam where something similar happened, and as they were not part of the same question [as in 1.1.1 and 1.anythingbut1.x] you were not supposed to...

really i think its unfair if they take marks off though...if you showed correct working then IMO you should get the mark

[abzzzz]

I hope its one of those questions we all get a mark for

[BoredSatan]

The answer is NO, you were not supposed to carry forward that information.

I did - but my friend said he did another exam where something similar happened, and as they were not part of the same question [as in 1.1.1 and 1.anythingbut1.x] you were not supposed to...

really i think its unfair if they take marks off though...if you showed correct working then IMO you should get the mark

you wont lose a mark for including it thats for sure..

but yeah im sure not many people would have remembered that far back.. so im hoping its right to not included as well

[Hodgeyhodgey]

Pretty sure I included the stock write down and maybe even the gain, but not the sales return. Would I get a mark or lose it for including only some of the previous information?