Compare Answers?

[RossiJ]

for a limitation of the WCR I said it is based on historical data... also correct?

[MaddehZ]

for a limitation of the WCR I said it is based on historical data... also correct?

all ratios are based on historical data...they MIGHT accept it...doesnt distinguish it from the other indicators

best to talk about how it includes stock, pp expenses OR how its a static measure, capturing only a "snapshot" of CA:CL for one day

[kamb0z]

Wouldn't 1.2.3 be 300 regardless of how much you added to the stock gain?
It says that 10 units of the Prestige Bag were written down, and then it says in brackets specifically that it was the 90 dollar ones.
So it would be 10 of the 90 dollar ones being written down as opposed to the 1 at 80 and 9 at 90?

[Saur11]

I think it would be important to place emphasis on the fact that the net profit figure increases. Otherwise the examiners may interpret it as the net profit ratio increased - which was not the case.

[Mario]

Wouldn't 1.2.3 be 300 regardless of how much you added to the stock gain?
It says that 10 units of the Prestige Bag were written down, and then it says in brackets specifically that it was the 90 dollar ones.
So it would be 10 of the 90 dollar ones being written down as opposed to the 1 at 80 and 9 at 90?

yea id say so, it sais (at cost $90 each)  neva know they may be lenient cause heaps of people may have done tha same thing because of 1.1.1