Would a cusp point have no gradient or be undefined?
Could you give an example of two functions which have cusp points? Would |x| and |x2| be functions with cusp points?
Can you help me out with this question..
Consider a power function of the form f(x)=xp/q where p and q are positive numbers. Find which values of p and q for the function f(x) to have a cusp point?
I don't understand this question.. do we have keep on subbing in values of p and q to see a relationship? help..
1. Would a cusp point have no gradient or be undefined?A cusp point is really just a point that isn't "smooth" on the graph and the tangents are equal on both sides (i.e. the two branches are somewhat mirror images of each other). After reading quite a few resources, the definition seems more complicated than this, but a cusp is defined for a function, and has "no gradient" at that point. The function certainly isn't undefined at the cusp point e.g. By definition, it seems y = |x| has a cusp point at x = 0, but its still defined at x=0.
2. Could you give an example of two functions which have cusp points? Would |x| and |x2| be functions with cusp points?So, as I just explained, cusp points are when the gradient is undefined. The best way to see this is simply graphing the two equations on your calculator. You will see that |x| has a sudden bend ("pointy end") at x = 0. This is a cusp point.
|x^2| has no cusp point? Why? Because x^2 is always >0 and hence, the absolute value signs have NO impact on the expression. If you graph y=|x^2|, you will note that it looks exactly the same as y = x^2.
3. Consider a power function of the form f(x)=xp/q where p and q are positive numbers. Find which values of p and q for the function f(x) to have a cusp point?This is a good question and to be frank, I think the answer is far more complicated than the one I will give. If you test out a few values, you will find that you have a cusp for x^(2/3) or x^(4/7), but no cusp for graphs like y = x^(4/3) -- oddly enough. I think this question is outside the methods course =.=.
Having said that, my logic was as follows:
- If q is even, then there is no cusp point (as the graph has an end point at x = 0). Hence, q must be odd.
- When q is odd, the cusp only occurs when p is even.
- When you differentiate the function, you get f'(x) = (p/q)x^(p/q - 1). We require p/q - 1 < 0 so that at x = 0, you are "dividing by 0" and hence, showing it has no derivative at that point. Hence, p/q <1. As you said both are positive, 0<p/q<1. (as x^0 clearly has no cusp)
Thus, I came to the conclusion that q must be odd (i.e. q = 2n - 1, where n is an element of the Natural Number set). For p/q to be less than 1 AND even, we require p = 2k, where k is an element of the natural number set AND p<2n - 1. i.e. p is even and less than q.
Assumptions I made:
- p/q must be the most simplest form of the fraction.
- The natural number set does not include 0. I forgot which definition VCAA methods uses, but the definition of the "natural number set" is debatable as some believe it to include 0.
- p and q are positive WHOLE numbers.
Hope the stuff I said is correct. I'm not 100% sure on question 3, so it might be best to ask someone else for confirmation....
Hope I helped.