Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 02:40:21 pm

Author Topic: VCE Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!  (Read 2640359 times)  Share 

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jeggz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Respect: +42
  • School: Presbyterian Ladies' College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2745 on: November 10, 2013, 10:22:45 pm »
+1
How are we all feeling about tomorrow?  :)
Melbourne University - Commerce; Actuarial Studies.

Tutoring 2015 - Email/PM for places!

papertowns

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2746 on: November 10, 2013, 11:34:48 pm »
0
help please :(

sin0001

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
  • Respect: +1
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2747 on: November 10, 2013, 11:43:31 pm »
+2
help please :(
Consider tan^-1 (piT/6), it approaches pi/2 as t-->infinity
So 17tan^-1 (piT/6) would be 'stretched' by a factor of 17 from the x-axis, and therefore its max. range will be 17pi/2, as T--> infinity
ATAR: 99.00
Monash Commerce Scholars

Stevensmay

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2748 on: November 10, 2013, 11:45:05 pm »
+2
help please :(

Best to do this by simplifying it.
We know that the range of will be
This is on your formula sheet if you forget.

If we graph this, we can see that no matter how big x gets, the y value will never reach
We simply times this by 17, as that was the amplitude of the original graph to get 

Therefore the terminal velocity is , as no matter how long it accelerates it will never reach this velocity.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2013, 11:58:28 pm by Stevensmay »

papertowns

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2749 on: November 10, 2013, 11:50:09 pm »
0
Thank you both! Makes sense :D

papertowns

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2750 on: November 11, 2013, 12:51:55 am »
0
I've shaded the region, just not sure how to work out the area :(

Stevensmay

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2751 on: November 11, 2013, 12:54:26 am »
0
I've shaded the region, just not sure how to work out the area :(

Was z defined as something? Need a bit more info to work out the best approach.

papertowns

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2752 on: November 11, 2013, 12:56:54 am »
0
Was z defined as something? Need a bit more info to work out the best approach.

Woops yes sorry haha, z was cis(pi/12) and z^4 = cis(pi/3)

papertowns

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2753 on: November 11, 2013, 12:57:38 am »
0
that's for z1 btw

Stevensmay

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2754 on: November 11, 2013, 01:05:46 am »
+4
I've shaded the region, just not sure how to work out the area :(

Most simplest approach is thus.

The angle of the area we are interested in is

We are going to calculate the area of a circle with radius 2, then subtract the area of a circle with radius 1.

Area of a circle is normally but we only have of a circle, or 1/8 of the area, .

Let r = 2.


So now we need to find the area of the smaller circle, so we can subtract it away.
Let r = 1


Therefore total area will be the larger circle subtract the smaller circle.



There are more complex methods but I prefer this one.

papertowns

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2755 on: November 11, 2013, 01:09:27 am »
0
Most simplest approach is thus.

The angle of the area we are interested in is

We are going to calculate the area of a circle with radius 2, then subtract the area of a circle with radius 1.

Area of a circle is normally but we only have of a circle, or 1/8 of the area, .

Let r = 2.


So now we need to find the area of the smaller circle, so we can subtract it away.
Let r = 1


Therefore total area will be the larger circle subtract the smaller circle.



There are more complex methods but I prefer this one.

Thank you so much!! Was really confused with the 1/8 in the assessor's report but this all makes sense now thank you again! :D

barydos

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 314
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Nossal High School
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2756 on: November 11, 2013, 10:16:02 am »
0
Guys I'm derping out badly.
How do you convert z=iz to cartesian form
x+yi = i(x+yi)
x+yi = -y + xi
x = - y ?
or y = x ?

what do i do
2012: Methods [47] | Chinese SL [35]
2013: Specialist [48] | Chemistry [41] | Physics [44] | English Language [40]
ATAR: 99.55

abcdqd

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +61
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2757 on: November 11, 2013, 10:25:29 am »
+2
Guys I'm derping out badly.
How do you convert z=iz to cartesian form
x+yi = i(x+yi)
x+yi = -y + xi
x = - y ?
or y = x ?

what do i do
I don't think that exists? Or the only solution is (0,0)? You might be thinking of z=i*conj(z)
2012-2013: VCE, Melbourne High School

2014-2016: Bachelor of Commerce, Actuarial Studies, University of Melbourne

barydos

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 314
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Nossal High School
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2758 on: November 11, 2013, 10:39:54 am »
0
I don't think that exists? Or the only solution is (0,0)? You might be thinking of z=i*conj(z)

Wow that's supremely awkward, the questions says z=i*conj(z) you're right. I just wasn't reading right haha.
Now I can have peace of mind thanks to you. CHEERS!
2012: Methods [47] | Chinese SL [35]
2013: Specialist [48] | Chemistry [41] | Physics [44] | English Language [40]
ATAR: 99.55

ahat

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Monash MBBS class of 2018!
  • Respect: +9
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2759 on: November 11, 2013, 11:02:14 am »
0
"If force ai + bj and ci + dj newtons act simultaneously on an object of m kg, it's acceleration in ms-2 will be?
If the question wanted us to find the magnitude of the acceleration, would it explicitly say "magnitude of acceleration"? (as the answer to the above question is a vector) Thanks.

Also, for this question, which answer would you choose?
Spoiler
« Last Edit: November 11, 2013, 11:10:15 am by ahat »
I am a mathhole