Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 29, 2026, 09:35:56 am

Author Topic: VCE Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!  (Read 2727412 times)  Share 

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

rife168

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 408
  • Respect: +36
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #330 on: March 04, 2012, 07:45:26 pm »
+2
Having a mental block and can't seem to work out these questions (tech free) :(
The first two I can simplify partially but not fully to get the stated answers, the last two I'm just lost so any insight on how to solve them would be much appreciated.

- cos^2(x)/sin(x) + sin(x)  answer=cosec(x)


First one:

             Take sin(x) out as a factor
           
                         



2012: VCE - 99.10
2013: PhB(Sci)@ANU

rife168

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 408
  • Respect: +36
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #331 on: March 04, 2012, 07:50:25 pm »
+2
- Simplify tan((pi/2)-y)    answer= cot(y)




2012: VCE - 99.10
2013: PhB(Sci)@ANU

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #332 on: March 04, 2012, 08:24:21 pm »
+2
Having a mental block and can't seem to work out these questions (tech free) :(
The first two I can simplify partially but not fully to get the stated answers, the last two I'm just lost so any insight on how to solve them would be much appreciated.

- cos^2(x)/sin(x) + sin(x)  answer=cosec(x)


First one:

             Take sin(x) out as a factor
           
                         




Slightly shorter method


(as )


For the others use
to find sin(x), then tan(x)=sin(x)/cos(x), then sec(x)=1/cos(x)

For sin(x+y), you've found cos(x) and sin(x) already, draw up a triangle with the opposite=5 and adjacent=12 with angle y so that you can find cos(y) an sin(y), then you can use the addition formula sin(x+y)=sin(x)cos(y)+cos(x)sin(y)

Then for tan(x+2y) we know that tan(a+b)=, so we need tan(2y), which we can use the double angle formula for,
so then use and sub in the values.

For tan(x)=2, draw up a traingle with opposite=2, adjacent=1, then find the hypotenus=root(4+1)=root(5). Now you can find sin(x)=2/root(5) and cos(x)=1/root(5).  Now you can use the double angle formulas and and take into account the quadrant.

For the last one , is just like you double angle formula for tan, so we can say that

Hope that helps :) (and hope there aren't any mistakes there, eyes are tired so there might be)
« Last Edit: March 04, 2012, 08:35:31 pm by b^3 »
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #333 on: March 06, 2012, 05:27:39 pm »
0
Could anyone prove this vector?

It seems simple enough to do, AB + BC + CA = O and find another way to represent that and cancel down.

But for some reason, I can never seem to actually cancel down, (i always get -2c or something)

yawho

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
  • Respect: +2
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #334 on: March 06, 2012, 08:17:50 pm »
0
Could anyone prove this vector?

It seems simple enough to do, AB + BC + CA = O and find another way to represent that and cancel down.

But for some reason, I can never seem to actually cancel down, (i always get -2c or something)

a + b = AC = -c, .: a + b + c = 0

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #335 on: March 07, 2012, 05:08:39 pm »
0
Thanks for that, yawho, seems to make more sense now!

And just one more question, when finding solutions of compex numbers, how would you know when you're meant to add the angle along with the 2πk rule?

Attached is what i mean:

I have a feeling you're meant to only use 2πk (and not add any angles) only for whole numbers such as 3, 6 and when it comes to cartesian/polar form (3-4i or rcis(2π)), you're meant to use the angle that it creates in addition to 2πk..
« Last Edit: March 07, 2012, 05:13:52 pm by generalkorn12 »

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #336 on: March 07, 2012, 05:21:32 pm »
+1
you always need to add the 2k(pi), think about it geometrically, you have angle theta, but any more full rotations around the circle will yield the same angle, hence the +2kpi
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

rife168

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 408
  • Respect: +36
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #337 on: March 09, 2012, 07:24:56 pm »
0
Would someone please be able to help me simplify the following:
It's part of an extended question and I have done previous working to get to this:

Find the following in terms of and


2012: VCE - 99.10
2013: PhB(Sci)@ANU

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #338 on: March 09, 2012, 09:07:11 pm »
+1
It is easy to express and in terms of **, to express just write it as and again use your identities.

** http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Double-AngleFormulas.html second and third equation for
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

rife168

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 408
  • Respect: +36
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #339 on: March 09, 2012, 09:36:53 pm »
0
It is easy to express and in terms of **, to express just write it as and again use your identities.

** http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Double-AngleFormulas.html second and third equation for

Care to elaborate? The fact that it's cos(2x) = 2cos2(x)-1 is screwing me over a bit. Should I just add -1 + 1 to the expressions and simplify?
2012: VCE - 99.10
2013: PhB(Sci)@ANU

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #340 on: March 09, 2012, 10:10:56 pm »
+3
cos(4x) - cos^4(x) + 6cos^2(x)sin^2(x)
= cos(4x) - cos^2(x)cos^2(x) + 6 cos^2(x)sin^2(x)

now cos(2x) = 2cos^2(x) - 1, so cos^2(x) = [cos(2x) + 1]/2
also cos(2x) = 1-2sin^2(x), so sin^2(x) = [1-cos(2x)]/2

substitute and you're done.
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

rife168

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 408
  • Respect: +36
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #341 on: March 09, 2012, 10:44:22 pm »
0
mmm.. thanks, I seem to have overcomplicated it for myself.
2012: VCE - 99.10
2013: PhB(Sci)@ANU

Mr. Study

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 494
  • Onion Knight
  • Respect: +18
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #342 on: March 11, 2012, 01:34:35 pm »
0
Two forces act on an object. They are described by the vectors: F1= and F2=. If a third force, F3 is applied to the body, and the resultant force is zero, Find F3.

The text book have an explanation that involved 3 forces, not the two.

I got the resultant force, for F1 and F2 to be . If that helps.

Thanks. :)
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 01:36:28 pm by Mr. Study »
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

nubs

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 688
  • Respect: +97
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #343 on: March 11, 2012, 02:41:11 pm »
+1
since we don't know what F3 is, let's assign the variable x and y to describe it

so let F3 = xi + yj

we know that the resultant force, F1 + F2 + F3 = 0
So:
13i -5j - 4i + 9j + xi +yj = 0
9i + 4j + xi + yj = 0
(9 + x)i + (4+y)j = 0

so 9 + x and 4 + y both have to equal 0
so x = -9 and y = -4
now we can sub these values back into F3 = xi + yj
F3 = -9i - 4j

You had already done most of the work when you found the resultant force of F1 and F2 to equal 9i + 4j, F3 just had to be a vector that cancelled them out to equal 0 when added together, so straight away you can tell from that that F3 needed to equal -9i -4j :)
ATAR: 99.15

BSc @ UoM
2012-2014

ex oh ex oh

ashoni

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 132
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #344 on: March 11, 2012, 05:07:56 pm »
0
In the storeroom of a fruit shop there were two boxes of apples, one of Golden Delicious and the other of Jonathons, which were to be sold at $2.80 and$3.50/kg, respectively. The apples were accidentally mixed together and, instead of sorting them out, the owner decides to sell them as they were. So as not to make  a loss, he sold the mixed apples at $3.10/kg. How many kilograms of each type of apple were there if together they weighed 35kg in total?

thanks..