Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 27, 2025, 11:43:57 am

Author Topic: VCE Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!  (Read 2552246 times)  Share 

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

mark_alec

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1173
  • Respect: +30
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1980 on: July 19, 2013, 02:28:25 pm »
+1
could someone help me with    f, g and h?  thanksssss
What's the question?

Jaswinder

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 152
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1981 on: July 19, 2013, 04:06:13 pm »
0
sorry forgot to upload. did it on the first. help appreciated :)
« Last Edit: July 19, 2013, 04:08:29 pm by Jaswinder »

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1982 on: July 19, 2013, 07:40:48 pm »
0
Hi guys, i just had a quick q about terminology:

what do we call the stationary point of x4 (or higher even power of x)?

for f(x) = x4, f'(0) = 0 clearly and when you graph it, looks like at local min at x = 0 so that's what i've always called it.
but, f''(0) = 0 which implies (in the VCE course) a point of inflection.

a "local minimum stationary point of inflection" just sounds wrong...
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1983 on: July 19, 2013, 08:11:13 pm »
+4
Actually, in the VCE course, a point of inflection only occurs when the first derivative changes sign. f''(x) = 0 is a necessary but insufficient condition. y=x^4 would have a global minimum at the origin. There, the first derivative is 4x^3 but does not change sign at the origin. The second derivative is zero, but so is the third derivative.
For the general nth derivative test, if the first n derivatives are all zero at a point, but the (n+1)th derivative is not, then if n+1 is even, the stationary point is a local extremum, but if n+1 is odd, then the stationary point is a point of inflection. If n+1 is even and the (n+1)th derivative is positive, then we have a local minimum and vice versa.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1984 on: July 19, 2013, 08:16:36 pm »
+3
In addition to what nliu1995 has said, this is a good explanation  :)
2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1985 on: July 19, 2013, 08:18:56 pm »
0
Actually, in the VCE course, a point of inflection only occurs when the first derivative changes sign. f''(x) = 0 is a necessary but insufficient condition. y=x^4 would have a global minimum at the origin. There, the first derivative is 4x^3 but does not change sign at the origin. The second derivative is zero, but so is the third derivative.
For the general nth derivative test, if the first n derivatives are all zero at a point, but the (n+1)th derivative is not, then if n+1 is even, the stationary point is a local extremum, but if n+1 is odd, then the stationary point is a point of inflection. If n+1 is even and the (n+1)th derivative is positive, then we have a local minimum and vice versa.

okay, cool thanks nliu! (ofc it was you that replied :P, or b^3)
never knew about the (n+1)th derivative rule thanks, I used to always just look at the power.. x^(even) is a tp and x^(odd) is stationary poi which seemed so insufficient as a proof. . .

Add: Thanks 2/cos(c), ill check out the link now :)
« Last Edit: July 19, 2013, 08:20:29 pm by Alwin »
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0

Aelru

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • etc. etc.
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Some secondary college off Albert Bandura's nose.
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1986 on: July 20, 2013, 09:25:09 am »
0
kk, looks like everyone's working hard as usual :D

"The gradient of the normal to a curve at any point (x,y) is three times the gradient of the line joining the same point to the origin."

Construct a differential equation, but do not attempt to solve it.

I nearly got it. Not sure where my logic's flawed though ><



1.As gradient of the line is three times to LH, .
2.Next is the part I got wrong. As "gradient of the normal x gradient of tangent = -1",

Yet the answer says
I assumed they just divided the 3 on RH to the LH, but not sure where the derivative bits disappeared to.

EDIT: unless i mistaken gradient of the normal , as differentiating the normal..
« Last Edit: July 20, 2013, 09:34:56 am by Aelru »
2012: [Methods]
2013: [Psychology][Specialist][Chemistry][English][Health&Human Development]

Jeggz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Respect: +42
  • School: Presbyterian Ladies' College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1987 on: July 20, 2013, 11:18:35 am »
0
Aah this question was on our SAC this week!
Anyways, this is my logic -

We know the gradient of the curve at any point (x,y) is , hence the gradient of the normal would be
In regards to the gradient of the line, let's use the formula , where rise = and run = , which makes the gradient of the line .

Piecing together all the information we have we can conclude that
, re-arranging this gives the answer :)
Melbourne University - Commerce; Actuarial Studies.

Tutoring 2015 - Email/PM for places!

Aelru

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • etc. etc.
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Some secondary college off Albert Bandura's nose.
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1988 on: July 20, 2013, 11:39:56 am »
0
Aah this question was on our SAC this week!
Anyways, this is my logic -

We know the gradient of the curve at any point (x,y) is , hence the gradient of the normal would be
In regards to the gradient of the line, let's use the formula , where rise = and run = , which makes the gradient of the line .

Piecing together all the information we have we can conclude that
, re-arranging this gives the answer :)

wonderful explanation. Thanks Jeggz~
2012: [Methods]
2013: [Psychology][Specialist][Chemistry][English][Health&Human Development]

bonappler

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • Respect: +3
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1989 on: July 20, 2013, 01:11:25 pm »
0
Having trouble with this one.

Conic

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 427
  • Very eccentric.
  • Respect: +42
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1990 on: July 20, 2013, 02:02:30 pm »
+1
Part a:
First we find the width of the rectangle:
(Check the diagram for the variables I used)













Now the area is simply , or .



Part b:





Using the initial conditions (t=0, x=4):





Part c:



Which is 42 hours and 40 minutes.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2013, 09:00:36 pm by Conic »
2012-13: VCE at Parade College (Chemistry, English, Mathematical Methods, Physics and Specialist Mathematics).
2014-16: Bachelor of Science at La Trobe University (Mathematics and Statistics).
2017-17: Bachelor of Science (Honours) at La Trobe University (Mathematics).
2018-21: PhD at La Trobe University (Mathematics).

scribble

  • is sexier than Cthulhu
  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 814
  • Respect: +145
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1991 on: July 20, 2013, 09:00:17 pm »
0
you can also find the surface area by writing the equation of the circle:

W^2+(h-2)^2=4
solve for w in terms of h

and then the width of the water is 2W

Jaswinder

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 152
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1992 on: July 20, 2013, 09:33:42 pm »
0
could someone help me with    f, g and h?  thanksssss

sorry: forgot to upload

bump

SocialRhubarb

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +34
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1993 on: July 20, 2013, 11:52:49 pm »
+2
f.)
Spoiler
Eqn 1.

Eqn 2.

Alternatively, you could use the negative half of the ellipse.

Eqn 1 divided by Eqn 2 gives:

















Eliminate 5.58, since we generated an extra solution when we squared both sides, it doesn't actually work, which you can see from the graph.

Done with windows calculator, not sure if accurate.




g.)
Spoiler
i.)

ii.)



« Last Edit: July 21, 2013, 12:16:18 am by SocialRhubarb »
Fight me.

saba.ay

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1994 on: July 21, 2013, 03:52:34 pm »
0

Could someone please explain how to do part d)? The midpoint, M, is ((3/4)*cos(θ) , (-3/2)*sin(θ)).

Please and thank you  :)