Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 22, 2026, 07:29:35 am

Author Topic: VCE Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!  (Read 2708603 times)  Share 

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

atar.notes.user

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Respect: +2
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8985 on: November 01, 2017, 11:21:24 pm »
0
hey guys, what are the common questions that students usually lose marks on in the exam?

exit

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
  • COALESCE
  • Respect: +38
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8986 on: November 01, 2017, 11:55:29 pm »
0
How do I do this VCAA question? I have no idea
VCE [ATAR: 99.25]: Physics 1/2, English 1/2, EngLang,Methods, Spesh, Accounting, Chem, German

2018-2021: Bachelor Of Commerce @ University of Melbourne
VCE English Language: A+ Short Answer Guide[pm for extra guidance!]

Opengangs

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 718
  • \(\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{G}\)
  • Respect: +480
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8987 on: November 02, 2017, 12:17:00 am »
+3
How do I do this VCAA question? I have no idea
Recall that F = ma, where m is the mass and the acceleration is given as: a.
Rearranging, we get:



humblepie

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8988 on: November 02, 2017, 07:38:13 pm »
0
Could someone please explain to me how they went from the second line to third (1st attachment)?

Also, could someone show me how to antidiff the expression (2nd attachment) by hand?

Thank-you :)
2018-2022: Bachelor of Medical Science and Doctor of Medicine @ Monash University
2017: English | Methods | Spesh | Chem
2016: Chinese SL | Biology

Eric11267

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 118
  • Today three of my enemies I shall strike dead
  • Respect: +41
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8989 on: November 02, 2017, 07:41:42 pm »
+1
Could someone please explain to me how they went from the second line to third (1st attachment)?

Also, could someone show me how to antidiff the expression (2nd attachment) by hand?

Thank-you :)
1. They literally just turned the root(3)/2 and 1/2 into trigonometric expressions
Then from line three to line four they used the cosine compound angle formula
2. Won't go into specifics but you have to multiply the top and bottom by e^-x and do a u substitution for the numerator

Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8990 on: November 02, 2017, 07:48:15 pm »
+2
Could someone please explain to me how they went from the second line to third (1st attachment)?

Also, could someone show me how to antidiff the expression (2nd attachment) by hand?

Thank-you :)
1. They basically converted those exact value to trigonometric values.



2.


From here you can use partial fractions to find the integral of 1/(2+e^x)
« Last Edit: November 02, 2017, 07:51:31 pm by Syndicate »
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

uhoh

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Respect: +1
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8991 on: November 02, 2017, 10:38:06 pm »
0
Image 1: If it didn't say a is a positive real constant, could a be -root 3 or positive root3? Or can a never be -root3?

Image 2: a) What's the difference between finding r(2)-r(0) and doing the usual antidiff, etc? What does r(2)-r(0) represent?

b) Do we need to let velocity=0 to check for a turn or something? Don't we usually do that?

Image 3: Do we get consequential marks in spesh?
I got one of the solutions for 4a) wrong, so I got one solution for b) wrong too. Since b) is only one mark, that's the ans mark and there would be consequential marks, right? If b) was two marks though, would I get one mark even though my final ans is wrong?

Image 4: I did integral from -3 to 5, for 1/2*(y+3) dy and multiplied by pi. I get 17 pi but the ans is 16 pi



uhoh

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Respect: +1
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8992 on: November 02, 2017, 10:45:53 pm »
0
Q7b: I understand how the ans drew cosex(2x)<cosec(x) but I drew sin(2x)>sin(x)
Should get the same ans but I got (0,pi/3) and the actual ans is (0,pi/3)union (pi/2, pi)

Q8bii) How am I supposed to know that f(X) and f-1(x) intersect only once?

Q9c) The examiners report says you can use a vector method- how do you do it?





uhoh

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Respect: +1
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8993 on: November 03, 2017, 12:36:17 am »
0
Sorry for all the questions, I left starting exams until too late!

1b: Why do you use the unit vector of a, not a?
And when do you know when to use cosine + dot OR tan to find an angle?

6b) The examiner's report said we can't use partial fractions (3rd pic) Why not? (I know we use our ans from part a)

7a) How do you do this? Multiplication of ordinates by drawing out y=3x and y=arctan(2x) separately?






Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8994 on: November 03, 2017, 12:57:26 am »
+4
Image 1: If it didn't say a is a positive real constant, could a be -root 3 or positive root3? Or can a never be -root3?

Image 2: a) What's the difference between finding r(2)-r(0) and doing the usual antidiff, etc? What does r(2)-r(0) represent?

b) Do we need to let velocity=0 to check for a turn or something? Don't we usually do that?

Image 3: Do we get consequential marks in spesh?
I got one of the solutions for 4a) wrong, so I got one solution for b) wrong too. Since b) is only one mark, that's the ans mark and there would be consequential marks, right? If b) was two marks though, would I get one mark even though my final ans is wrong?

Image 4: I did integral from -3 to 5, for 1/2*(y+3) dy and multiplied by pi. I get 17 pi but the ans is 16 pi




1. Yes otherwise it can be negative, as only the modulus of all sides are equal |-sqrt(3)| = |sqrt(3)|

2.Because when you integrate the velocity vector, you get an arbitrary constant. Doing the usual anti-diff (and then subbing in your cakes for t=0) is the same as r(2) + r(0). r(2) -r(0) is incorrect as it assumes the origin is at the place of r(0) (note: the particle doesn't start at the origin)

(I am on my phone, so I may mistakes in my working out)

r(t) = (2t^2 -3t)i + t^2j -5tk + c

r(0) = i - 2k = c

Therefore r(t) = (2t^2 -3t +1)i + t^2j - (5t+2)k

r(2) = 3i + 4j - 12k

|r(2)| = sqrt(169) = 13 (distance from origin)

b) that is to find the TOTAL distance travelled. We are calculating the displacement (distance from the origin).

3) You might. Not entirely sure of that.

4) I think you made a mistake, because I am getting 16pi as well (can't show full working out right now).

Q7b: I understand how the ans drew cosex(2x)<cosec(x) but I drew sin(2x)>sin(x)
Should get the same ans but I got (0,pi/3) and the actual ans is (0,pi/3)union (pi/2, pi)

Q8bii) How am I supposed to know that f(X) and f-1(x) intersect only once?

Q9c) The examiners report says you can use a vector method- how do you do it?






7.  You have to consider the reciprocal. Otherwise you will be neglecting one side of the solution. Draw the graph of both to find out (use Desmos if you want). Sin(x) is different to cosex(x) as there are also asymptotes and turning points.

8. It's a one to one function. It will intersect twice on both sides of the origin.

9. Can't show full working out right now. But what I would do is find the gradient of the tangent. Write down the corresponding vectors (ie. gradient of 1 represents the vector i + j). Then use cos(x) = a.b/(|a||b|)

Sorry for all the questions, I left starting exams until too late!

1b: Why do you use the unit vector of a, not a?
And when do you know when to use cosine + dot OR tan to find an angle?

6b) The examiner's report said we can't use partial fractions (3rd pic) Why not? (I know we use our ans from part a)

7a) How do you do this? Multiplication of ordinates by drawing out y=3x and y=arctan(2x) separately?







1. You can use either, it doesn't matter. Using the unit vector just makes it slightly easier.

6b) when the degree of the numerator is equal or greater than the degree of the denominator, you'll have to use long division to break it up and than integrate it.

7a) it's best to draw out both functions, and you'll see that the range is R as x can take any real value. (There would be no asymptotes)

« Last Edit: November 03, 2017, 01:09:44 am by Syndicate »
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

uhoh

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Respect: +1
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8995 on: November 03, 2017, 01:41:24 am »
0
2.Because when you integrate the velocity vector, you get an arbitrary constant. Doing the usual anti-diff (and then subbing in your cakes for t=0) is the same as r(2) + r(0). r(2) -r(0) is incorrect as it assumes the origin is at the place of r(0) (note: the particle doesn't start at the origin)
what does r(2)-r(0) give, if not the distance?[
and how does r(2)+r(0) give the same ans as antidiffing normally?


7.  You have to consider the reciprocal. Otherwise you will be neglecting one side of the solution. Draw the graph of both to find out (use Desmos if you want). Sin(x) is different to cosex(x) as there are also asymptotes and turning points.
from cosec(2x)<cosec(x), why I can't I say (1/sin(2x))<(1/sin(x)), so sin(2x)>sin(x)? Sorry, I don't understand why that'd be neglecting one side of the solution

8. It's a one to one function. It will intersect twice on both sides of the origin.
How does being 1-1 affect f(x)=f-1(x) having 1 soln (at the origin)?

1. You can use either, it doesn't matter. Using the unit vector just makes it slightly easier.
How do you do it using the normal vector? And how come using the unit vector and normal vector will give the same ans?

And when do you know when to use cosine + dot OR tan to find an angle? Is cosine + dot for vectors and tan for straight lines or something? I don't think that's right though... In Q9, which I asked you, we could use both methods?

Thanks so much, wish I could thumbs up your reply more than once

uhoh

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Respect: +1
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8996 on: November 03, 2017, 01:44:24 am »
0
Sorry, last question for this late night!

8b) (1st image)
a) I said (sin(theta)/cos(theta))=(1/cos(theta))
So sin(theta)<1
I then drew a y=sin(theta) and y=1 to show that sin(theta) is less than 1 from 0<theta<pi/2

b) The examiners report says graphs aren't sufficient though? (2nd image)

c) I don't understand the 1st line of the iTute working either (3rd image), do they even use cos(theta)>0 after writing it in the first line?

8c (question in 1st image)
In the examiners report, they said inverse tan(2)>pi/3 could also be used to solve the problem
How?

Opengangs

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 718
  • \(\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{G}\)
  • Respect: +480
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8997 on: November 03, 2017, 07:06:22 am »
+3
For the following domain of theta,
0 < theta < pi/2
Since sintheta is positive over the domain then sin(0) <sintheta < sin(pi/2)

0 < sintheta < 1
Also, over the domain, we can deduce that costheta > 0. To verify this is true, sketch costheta between 0 and pi/2.

Since costheta is always positive, then dividing by costheta won't affect our inequality.
0/costheta < sintheta/costheta < 1/costheta
0 < tantheta < sectheta, which proves that tantheta < sectheta

Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8998 on: November 03, 2017, 12:37:58 pm »
0
And when do you know when to use cosine + dot OR tan to find an angle? Is cosine + dot for vectors and tan for straight lines or something? I don't think that's right though... In Q9, which I asked you, we could use both methods?

Thanks so much, wish I could thumbs up your reply more than once

Yes you can you both methods (and you are correct saying tan(x) is used for the linear method, whilst cos(x) is used for the dot product of the vectors). Personally, I am not exactly sure how to do the vector method. I would go with the linear method (where tan(x) = m - the gradient), as we already have the equations of the line because it would be more time efficient (it is also part of methods).
« Last Edit: November 03, 2017, 01:27:50 pm by Syndicate »
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

Rieko Ioane

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Respect: +3
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8999 on: November 03, 2017, 06:23:02 pm »
0
Hi,

Could I have some help with the VCAA 2014 E2?

MCQ14) they say the slope field lines that are on the line y = x are undefined. But how can we know this when the axes don't have values on them?

MCQ18) When resolving the force F2, why can't we split the 60 degree angle with F3 in half, so we have F2sin(30) for the vertical component?

Q2c) using the answer's diagram, why can't we use the triangle formed by the points (k, -2), (0, -2) and (0, -2-k)? Why can't we take cos(45) of this triangle where the 45 angle is at the vertice of (k, -2)?

Also, for that question for some reason I'm not convinced the angle made by the dotted line and y-axis is 45 degrees?