if you're really determined to get a score of 50 in spec as you state in your sig,I think you should take advantage of the fact that ex-Spec students are saying you need to know it! since the SINE and COSINE rules are probably either assumed knowledge or things that would be required for topics covered in spec! or maybe, .. things that differentiate the 49 from the 50?
Well to be honest it only takes like 1 hour to learn. And you could argue also that everyone in specialist should start learning similar triangles and area/volumes of all 2D and 3D shapes, since they have even more of a chance of being in the exam.
I'm just saying, as far as the textbook is concerned, the cosine rule is one of the least important matters. There are more important things outside of the textbook than that. But I agree, it's so quick and easy to learn that there's really nothing to lose by learning it.
Okay maybe the sine rule, but not the cosine rule unless you're doing either physics or further maths.
I learnt the cosine rule last year and found it very easy. But just because it's easy doesn't necessarily make it relevant to the course.
Look over the past 5 VCAA exams for specialist maths and you will find that the cosine rule is not used at all on any questions.
lol give it up mate
I'm pretty sure there was one question in the multiple choice section that required the cosine rule on this year's exam paper (it was vector related), or maybe I'm confusing it with a question on one of the trial exams I did
Plus, if you're using Lami's theorem, the sine rule isn't enough
and no, you don't need to memorise every single formula for the volume and areas of certain shapes - they give you these formulas, just like they give you the sine and cosine formulas on the formula sheet
If there is something on the formula sheet, you would be an idiot to not go over it and understand it well enough to be able to apply it
and fyi, you do need to know similar triangles for methods and spesh for some of the questions in the related rates section...