Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 28, 2025, 06:50:20 am

Author Topic: Theory of NMR!?!?  (Read 4897 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dark Horse

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Respect: +1
Theory of NMR!?!?
« on: April 16, 2009, 05:47:06 pm »
0
Hey guys, I understood the theory behind NMR when I learnt it at school, however, I went to a tsfx lecture today, and I do not understand the theory behind the technique. I know do not understand why a nuclei in a more electronegative bond (eg. O-H) is shifted more downfield than ( C-H). I mean, before I learnt that nuclei that were shielded to a greater degree (eg. C-H) absorbed less energy, and hence had a lower chemical shift than a nuclei that are less shielded (O-H). However, at tsfx, the lecturer kept talking about magnetic field energy, and how this is actually increased. Apparently relatively shielded nuclei absorb at a higher magnetic field energy (like tetramethylsilane) and everything is compared to TMS. Could someone please explain what I should know on this concept for VCE chem exam?

eg. Why is O-H more downfield than C-H? Answering this and addressing my concerns would be awesome, cos I'm kinda in panic mode =P   

if you dont know what im on about just tell me :)
2009 - Chemistry (47) --> [48.90]
2010 - English (50) --> [50]  Maths Methods (47) --> [49.04] Biology (48) --> [48.62] Health and Human Development (48) --> [47.37] Specialist Maths (40) --> [46.65] 
ATAR: 99.85

Australian Student Prize, Top All Rounder, English Premier's Award (2010)

Available for tutoring ($35 an hour) PM me for further details :)

vibs23

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: +1
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2009, 05:57:56 pm »
0
Depends on the molecule...

vibs23

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: +1
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2009, 06:10:13 pm »
0
It's kind of hard for me to follow your question. but dont worry, they wont ask for the exact scientific reasoning behind NMR spectroscopy because not everyone would have access to such technology, just questions where you have to interpret the data from the table.




chem-nerd

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
  • Respect: +13
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2009, 06:22:34 pm »
0
most of the theory behind this is beyond the scope of VCE.

nuclei that are strongly shielded by electrons need a higher external magnetic field to bring them into resonance hence are closer to TMS and vice versa.

protons on carbons next to electronegative atoms (halogens, O, N) are deshielded because of the electron-withdrawing ability of these atoms.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2009, 07:00:47 pm by chem-nerd »

Dark Horse

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Respect: +1
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2009, 06:38:00 pm »
0
Yeah lol, it wasnt very clear was it  well, i went to tsfx today, and got confused, because the lecturer kept going on about increasing the external magnetic field, which I had never heard before. So basically, I was wondering how chemical shift values are obtained?

"You have the proton NMR spectrum of ethanol. Why does the H in O-H have a higher chemical shift than the H in the CH3?" If that was a VCE exam question, how would you answer it?   
2009 - Chemistry (47) --> [48.90]
2010 - English (50) --> [50]  Maths Methods (47) --> [49.04] Biology (48) --> [48.62] Health and Human Development (48) --> [47.37] Specialist Maths (40) --> [46.65] 
ATAR: 99.85

Australian Student Prize, Top All Rounder, English Premier's Award (2010)

Available for tutoring ($35 an hour) PM me for further details :)

lacoste

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 973
  • Respect: +2
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2009, 06:52:43 pm »
0
What lecture was it by the way?

I thought TSFX dont do any easter programs

Dark Horse

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Respect: +1
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2009, 06:57:58 pm »
0
lol, i dont know, it was part of the masterclass The teacher was Irena (thats what i think her name was) she was really good, its just that I reckon the NMR theory she taught was hardert than it needed to be.
2009 - Chemistry (47) --> [48.90]
2010 - English (50) --> [50]  Maths Methods (47) --> [49.04] Biology (48) --> [48.62] Health and Human Development (48) --> [47.37] Specialist Maths (40) --> [46.65] 
ATAR: 99.85

Australian Student Prize, Top All Rounder, English Premier's Award (2010)

Available for tutoring ($35 an hour) PM me for further details :)

Gloamglozer

  • The Walking VTAC Guide
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4170
  • Here to listen and help
  • Respect: +324
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2009, 07:08:04 pm »
0
lol, i dont know, it was part of the masterclass The teacher was Irena (thats what i think her name was) she was really good, its just that I reckon the NMR theory she taught was hardert than it needed to be.

Yeah, it was part of the Intense Workshop (ie. Master Classes, weekly classes, etc) and I reckon Irena did a pretty good job doing it although half the time, I was pretty confused.

Bachelor of Science (Mathematics & Statistics) - Discrete Mathematics & Operations Research

lacoste

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 973
  • Respect: +2
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #8 on: April 16, 2009, 07:08:25 pm »
0
probably trying to scare you, thats what tsfx does best, throw in hard qsts relating to irrelvent theory.
 

lacoste

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 973
  • Respect: +2
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #9 on: April 16, 2009, 07:09:10 pm »
0
lol, i dont know, it was part of the masterclass The teacher was Irena (thats what i think her name was) she was really good, its just that I reckon the NMR theory she taught was hardert than it needed to be.

Yeah, it was part of the Intense Workshop (ie. Master Classes, weekly classes, etc) and I reckon Irena did a pretty good job doing it although half the time, I was pretty confused.

Does Byron teach there?

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #10 on: April 16, 2009, 07:10:46 pm »
0
"You have the proton NMR spectrum of ethanol. Why does the H in O-H have a higher chemical shift than the H in the CH3?"

The hydrogen atom in a hydroxyl group has a higher chemical shift than a hydrogen atom in a methyl group because the oxygen atom in the hydroxyl group is highly electronegative. This causes the electron on the hydrogen atom in the hydroxyl group to orbit closer towards the oxygen atom, and hence, orbit further away from the hydrogen nucleus. This deshields the hydrogen nucleus as less radio waves will be absorbed by this electron, and consequently, a different amount of energy, or rather, a different radio frequency is now required to 'flip' the direction of the hydrogen nuclei's spin.

However, I really don't think you'll be asked this. It's been stated many times that the emphasis is on interpretation of data, not the principles behind it. Check last year's exam for the kind of question you should be expecting.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


Dark Horse

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Respect: +1
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2009, 10:11:17 pm »
0
Thank you shinny, that was awesome, I get it now! (lol, I would give you karma but I dont have enough posts)

btw, byron doesnt teach there anymore, I put him as my first pref but he only does the summer school now
2009 - Chemistry (47) --> [48.90]
2010 - English (50) --> [50]  Maths Methods (47) --> [49.04] Biology (48) --> [48.62] Health and Human Development (48) --> [47.37] Specialist Maths (40) --> [46.65] 
ATAR: 99.85

Australian Student Prize, Top All Rounder, English Premier's Award (2010)

Available for tutoring ($35 an hour) PM me for further details :)

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #12 on: April 16, 2009, 10:20:50 pm »
0
I gave a bit more detail there than necessary in an exam. From what I know, just saying deshield without stating what that means or how it occurs is enough for VCE standards (if you ever even need to state this to begin with).
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


nicholasysc

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • Respect: +1
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #13 on: April 16, 2009, 10:21:52 pm »
0
Irena is awesome but she only teaches the Friday Chem class + Summer School etc. :S
What day + time do you (those who attends Chem Master Class) go to? n which teacher do you have?

Dark Horse

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Respect: +1
Re: Theory of NMR!?!?
« Reply #14 on: April 16, 2009, 10:31:54 pm »
0
Does Irena teach on Friday nights as in 4-6 or 7-9? I go on Friday 7-9, have Graeme Morgan, he goes slow but makes sure you understand the concepts.
2009 - Chemistry (47) --> [48.90]
2010 - English (50) --> [50]  Maths Methods (47) --> [49.04] Biology (48) --> [48.62] Health and Human Development (48) --> [47.37] Specialist Maths (40) --> [46.65] 
ATAR: 99.85

Australian Student Prize, Top All Rounder, English Premier's Award (2010)

Available for tutoring ($35 an hour) PM me for further details :)