Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 29, 2025, 09:53:20 pm

Author Topic: NMR multiplet  (Read 3043 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ggxoxo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 480
  • Respect: +5
  • School Grad Year: 2012
NMR multiplet
« on: April 28, 2012, 09:43:28 pm »
0
Hey guys; what is a multiplet???

And there is a qn that gives 3 esters: CH3CH2COOCH3; CH3COOCH2CH3 and HCOOCH2CH2CH3

and then it asks you that if a multiplet is seen in the high resolution 1H NMR spectrum of the ester, select the ester from above that it must be.

jasoN-

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 661
  • Respect: +7
  • School: WSC
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2012, 10:09:12 pm »
0
Wow, I thought all of those would show multiplets.. what the hell have I learnt? :/

Edit: If what they mean for multiplet is many peaks, and not just doublet or triplet (which are still multiplets by definition..), I would take a stab and choose the last structure, HCOOCH2CH2CH3, which would have a sextet within the spectra
« Last Edit: April 28, 2012, 10:13:34 pm by jasoN- »
2009-10: Methods (39) - Specialist Maths (36) - Further Maths (50) - Biology (36) - Chemistry (37) - English Language (36) - ATAR: 97.40
2011-2014: B.Pharm @ Monash University
2015+: Life

jaydee

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 197
  • Respect: +1
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2012, 10:43:52 pm »
0
multiplet shows up in the splitting of peaks due to nuclear spin spin coupling (i think). So for the last ester you'd have a 12 multiplet show up for the middle CH2 in propyl methanoate
VCE
2011  Psychology [45] Chinese SL [30]
2012 English [40], Math Methods[47], Specialist Maths[41], Chemistry[42], Physics[39]
ATAR 99.15

sam0001

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Respect: 0
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2012, 08:47:35 am »
0
howd you get 12? are you using the multiplicity rule?

jaydee

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 197
  • Respect: +1
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2012, 10:28:43 am »
0
yeah you'd have to multiply it since they aren't in the same chemical environments. multiplication has only ever appeared in trial exams (vcaa hasnt done them yet)
VCE
2011  Psychology [45] Chinese SL [30]
2012 English [40], Math Methods[47], Specialist Maths[41], Chemistry[42], Physics[39]
ATAR 99.15

Hellrocks

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 133
  • Respect: +1
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2012, 10:43:13 am »
0
Yes, its the last structure because the CH2 is between 2 hydrogen environments that are non equivalent.
The others only have a maximum of 1 non equivalent hydrogen environment.

ggxoxo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 480
  • Respect: +5
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2012, 02:23:22 pm »
0
howd you get 12? are you using the multiplicity rule?

Yea jaydee is right- can someone please explain the multiplicity rule very briefly?

And from your answers would it be safe to assume that a multiplet is just more than 3 peaklets
« Last Edit: April 29, 2012, 02:25:12 pm by ggxoxo »

jaydee

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 197
  • Respect: +1
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2012, 06:40:12 pm »
0
well you can say 4-multiplet or a quartet. i don't think theres a specific number you definitely have to say multiplet but for convenience i usually use multiplet for 5 and above. Multiplicity rule is basically (n+1) x (n+1). for example if u have HCOOCH2CH2CH3 u mentioned from before the middle CH2 is surrounded by CH2 and CH3 (both are different hydrogen environments to the middle CH2 group). (2+1) x (3+1) = 3 x 4=12 multiplet. As i said, highly unlikely that itll come up on the exam but good to know since some trail exams do have it
VCE
2011  Psychology [45] Chinese SL [30]
2012 English [40], Math Methods[47], Specialist Maths[41], Chemistry[42], Physics[39]
ATAR 99.15

Hellrocks

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 133
  • Respect: +1
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2012, 07:50:53 pm »
0
Its good that you know that rule, but you can also think of it logically.
If we're analysing the CH2 between the other CH2 and CH3, either the CH2 or CH3 would split the single peak into a triplet or quartet.

Case 1:

Single peak into triplet by CH2 (1 peak replicated twice 1+[1+1])
Then triplet into 12 peaks by CH3 (3 peaks replicated 3 times 3+[3+3+3])

Case 2:

Single peak into quartet by CH3 (1 peak replicated 3 times 1+[1+1+1])
Then quartet into 12 peaks by CH2 (4 peaks replicated 2 times 4+[4+4])

Either way we get 12 peaks

ggxoxo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 480
  • Respect: +5
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2012, 10:00:46 pm »
0
well you can say 4-multiplet or a quartet. i don't think theres a specific number you definitely have to say multiplet but for convenience i usually use multiplet for 5 and above. Multiplicity rule is basically (n+1) x (n+1). for example if u have HCOOCH2CH2CH3 u mentioned from before the middle CH2 is surrounded by CH2 and CH3 (both are different hydrogen environments to the middle CH2 group). (2+1) x (3+1) = 3 x 4=12 multiplet. As i said, highly unlikely that itll come up on the exam but good to know since some trail exams do have it

Sorry- I still don't understand (though I am really curious!); if CH2 is between CH2 and CH3 wouldn't the peak just split to 6 because it is the (n+1) rule? Why do you multiply (n+1) x (n+1)?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: NMR multiplet
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2012, 12:25:37 am »
+1
It's that time again.

There is a lot of misconceptions re: multiplicity. The word 'multiplet' itself is misused, the concept of multiplicity is also taken too far in this context.

In a nutshell:
- a 'sextet' and so forth are not multiplets. Multiplets are overlaps of ridiculously many peaks such that the end result is not classifiable. i.e. 'multiplets' are used when you cannot assign the mess of peaks.
- For alkanes and other relatively simple compounds, neighbouring environments on the same alkane chain (i.e. very similar, but slightly different environments) do not really deviate from the n+1 rule that much. This is because the difference in coupling frequency is very small, thus the second splitting will essentially overlap, giving you n+1 peaks. For the purposes of VCE, the (n+1)*(n+1) rule is almost never useful.
- Also, when you refer to these splitting, these are not a '12 multiplet', they are quartet of triplets or triplet of quartets (depending on which splitting frequency is larger). You can see the problem here is VCAA never gives you the splitting frequencies, so you cannot actually this. Anyhow, none of these are taught until 2nd or 3rd year uni.

So, don't use the word 'multiplet', only use the n+1 rule.

For more reading, you can check out my posts in these threads:

http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,25637.msg260490.html#msg260490
http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,26044.msg263934.html#msg263934
http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,26218.msg265278.html#msg265278
http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,26005.msg263938.html#msg263938
« Last Edit: April 30, 2012, 12:29:03 am by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015