@ninwa, I won't quote the parts I agree with you, you have some very good points in there. These are my differences,
I'm sorry, would you like to try my day job as a break from your dense work?
Even if you are joking, that is a false equivalence. I never questioned the value of a science degree. Science students do not get picked on nearly as much as arts students. Nobody's going to hear that you're doing a chemistry honours and go "haha what the fuck are you going to do with that, can I have fries with that?"
It's not entirely true that BSc is universally recognised as a 'good' degree. I've had many people on different occasions ask me why don't I do Eng and Comm instead, even people in BSc make fun of its (lack of) job prospects. BSc, like BA, doesn't lead to any particular careers either, and the very small specialist job market is also very competitive and generally always require a Ph.D. But, we don't get nearly as much shit as BA does, so the anger part is quite different.
- B.Eng certainly does not necessarily lead to being an engineer.
- LLB is one of the most generalist degrees there is and most people I know have nfi what they're going to do with it. If there -is- a clear career direction I'd love to hear it. No seriously, because I have no idea what I'm going to do with my LLB and could do with some advice.
- What is this supposedly clear direction for commerce/business degrees? I know commerce grads doing things from starting their own business, to working for Toys R Us, to being some sort of analyst for the big 4, to going into academia.
I would disagree with this. B.Eng generally lead to being an engineer, I won't comment on LLB because I know nothing about it, for Comm/Bus, depending on your major you generally get a job in that field (Marketing/Accountancy/etc). Degrees don't necessarily lock people in that field, you don't
have to be an engineer if you take B.Eng, but you always have that qualification to fall back on if your other life adventures don't work out too well. Same argument goes for other vocational degrees.
1) careers for arts degrees still exist
Just like how careers for BSc exists (which is only really in R&D or QC). No one goes into BSc at the age of 18 thinking they'll come out with a job in R&D, no one exits BSc at the age of 21 thinking they can get a job in R&D. It's a privilege if you can go into the specialist fields, but you don't expect to get in easily. So in my opinion, there is no 'general' career path for the layperson doing BA or BSc, not like how there is a general career path in front of a BEng. graduate.
Or perhaps the outcomes for science and arts students are just very similar.
They are, considering the graduates are qualified for being able to think (rather than knowing how to build a particular type of bridge). Most people go and compete in the 'general' job market, I guess.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with the piece of paper comment?
I'm saying, for most people, is getting a degree science/arts really necessary? It is after all taxpayer's money, so you are asking people who choose vocation over learning to partially fund the people who choose learning for the sake of learning. I can see why BEng/BComm/etc will be unhappy about this, some will see funding to BA/BSc as a waste.
I'm not sure if there is a better system, but I think the problem lies in early developments. Australia as a whole has very poor appreciation for the arts (different for science/technology), which may be why BA seems to cop all the shit. But the trouble is, if the parents are vocational oriented, taught by teachers who are also vocational oriented, chances are the child will only know about careers.
I watched a few interesting TED videos related to this topic:
http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.htmlhttp://www.ted.com/talks/sir_ken_robinson_bring_on_the_revolution.htmlhttp://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/ken_robinson_changing_education_paradigms.htmlOur education culture is too 'industrial' focused. It all needs to change.