Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 28, 2025, 07:23:06 pm

Author Topic: Exam Discussion  (Read 63587 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Wazzup

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #45 on: June 12, 2012, 12:43:34 pm »
yes pig was correct,

someone tell me something to feel better lool (realizing the marks lost) rofls.

nonimous

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #46 on: June 12, 2012, 12:47:55 pm »
For the polypeptide question i wrote both lower. If at 37 its such a high number and its optimum level for reactions, doesnt that suggest that polypeptides are the products or protein breakdown? Hence, at 10C enzymes are working slower to produce the product and at 80C enzymes are denatured
2011: Chemistry [35], Maths Methods [38], Polish [36]
2012 Aims: Biology [42+], Psychology [40+], Literature [33+], Economics [35+]
ATAR: 93+

ILiekMudkipz

  • Guest
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #47 on: June 12, 2012, 12:48:48 pm »
Agglutination happens when ppl donate blood to the wrong blood type right?
THAT WAS LIKE 3 OF THE ANSWERS.

ILiekMudkipz

  • Guest
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #48 on: June 12, 2012, 12:49:34 pm »
For the polypeptide question i wrote both lower. If at 37 its such a high number and its optimum level for reactions, doesnt that suggest that polypeptides are the products or protein breakdown? Hence, at 10C enzymes are working slower to produce the product and at 80C enzymes are denatured
But aren't proteins polypeptides?

diam0nds

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 80
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #49 on: June 12, 2012, 12:50:28 pm »
Agglutination happens when ppl donate blood to the wrong blood type right?
THAT WAS LIKE 3 OF THE ANSWERS.

that's what i thought lollll i don't think i read the table right
2011: Environmental Science
2012: English | Methods | Indo SL | Biology | Chemistry


kensan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 692
  • Do you even lift?
  • School: L.C.
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #50 on: June 12, 2012, 12:51:27 pm »
For the polypeptide question i wrote both lower. If at 37 its such a high number and its optimum level for reactions, doesnt that suggest that polypeptides are the products or protein breakdown? Hence, at 10C enzymes are working slower to produce the product and at 80C enzymes are denatured
that's what I thought, but it asked for concentration of polypeptides, not ammino acids
2013: BSc at UoM

nonimous

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #51 on: June 12, 2012, 12:54:49 pm »
Isn't meat in proteins like tertiary structure? And polypeptides the broken down primary structure? I understand the reasoning about polypeptides being proteins but why would 37 show such high levels? Its like 37 doesn't breakdown proteins? I just figured breakdown to amino acids happens in the intestines
2011: Chemistry [35], Maths Methods [38], Polish [36]
2012 Aims: Biology [42+], Psychology [40+], Literature [33+], Economics [35+]
ATAR: 93+

kensan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 692
  • Do you even lift?
  • School: L.C.
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #52 on: June 12, 2012, 12:58:46 pm »
Isn't meat in proteins like tertiary structure? And polypeptides the broken down primary structure? I understand the reasoning about polypeptides being proteins but why would 37 show such high levels? Its like 37 doesn't breakdown proteins? I just figured breakdown to amino acids happens in the intestines
yeah that's true, 37 should have been really low then :S
2013: BSc at UoM

ILiekMudkipz

  • Guest
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #53 on: June 12, 2012, 01:05:09 pm »
Isn't meat in proteins like tertiary structure? And polypeptides the broken down primary structure? I understand the reasoning about polypeptides being proteins but why would 37 show such high levels? Its like 37 doesn't breakdown proteins? I just figured breakdown to amino acids happens in the intestines
yeah that's true, 37 should have been really low then :S

You have nothing to compare it to, how do you know its not already low? =/

Bill Ding

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 105
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #54 on: June 12, 2012, 01:13:50 pm »
How much was that polypeptide question worth all up 4 marks? 2 for graph 2 for explaination?

ChickenCh0wM1en

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 772
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #55 on: June 12, 2012, 01:16:11 pm »
Yup, 2 marks for the drawing on the graph,

2 marks for the explanation.

Did anyone find this question ambiguous or confusing? Quite a few people at school interpreted it differently?
BSc (2015), MD1 (2016)
Tutoring in 2016: http://www.tutorfinder.com.au/tutors/detail.php?TutorID=78301
Chuck a PM if interested :)

Available for tutoring on the summer holidays for university subjects or VCe.
Also tutoring for the Melbourne uni MMIs (medical/physiotherapy interviews)

Please don't PM me for lecture slides or recordings. I don't have them anymore.

ILiekMudkipz

  • Guest
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #56 on: June 12, 2012, 01:16:40 pm »
How much was that polypeptide question worth all up 4 marks? 2 for graph 2 for explaination?
Im pretty sure the graph is worth 2 and the explanation is worth 2

nonimous

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #57 on: June 12, 2012, 01:18:20 pm »
Isn't meat in proteins like tertiary structure? And polypeptides the broken down primary structure? I understand the reasoning about polypeptides being proteins but why would 37 show such high levels? Its like 37 doesn't breakdown proteins? I just figured breakdown to amino acids happens in the intestines
yeah that's true, 37 should have been really low then :S

You have nothing to compare it to, how do you know its not already low? =/

True but it said the results were after 10 hours. After 10 hours would there be any material that hasn't broken down? I think if the explanations are correct either a higher or lower response can be accepted
2011: Chemistry [35], Maths Methods [38], Polish [36]
2012 Aims: Biology [42+], Psychology [40+], Literature [33+], Economics [35+]
ATAR: 93+

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #58 on: June 12, 2012, 01:18:56 pm »
For the 1st SA question. It had an electron micrograph like this http://umanitoba.ca/Biology/BIOL1020/lab3/images/PlantCell-Micrograph1.jpg - It asked for structure X, I wrote cell wall because it was relatively thick in comparison to the large mitochondrion???? But EVERYONE else chose cell membrane..... they said they didn't see any chloroplasts....but it doesn't have to have chloroplasts to be a plant cell like the root cells that are plant cells despite having no chloroplasts? UGH, am i being a smart cookie or naive student? I hope it's the first  :'(
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


zKskita

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • School: The University High School
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Exam Discussion
« Reply #59 on: June 12, 2012, 01:20:44 pm »
Just to be clear for myself and pretty much everyone else, is this correct?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ponyhudjkpbk3ms/Polypeptide.png
2012: Chinese | Latin | Biology
2013: English Language | Chemistry | Maths Methods | Global Politics
2014: Melbourne Environments / RMIT something (??)