Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 12, 2025, 02:19:20 am

Author Topic: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.  (Read 4902 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #15 on: August 21, 2012, 09:14:47 am »
0

Pb (s) + PbO2 (s) + 4H+ (aq) + 2 SO4 (aq) -> 2PbSO4 (s) + 2H2O (l),

Sorry about that :), copying and pasting seemed to have removed that arrow. -_-
No worries! I assumed that's where the arrow would be, just wanted to confirm.

Pb(s) + SO4/2-(aq) --> PbSO4(s) + 2e-

PbO2(s) + SO4/2-(aq) + 4H+(aq) + 2e- --> PbSO4(s) + 2H2O(l)

In the first Pb goes from 0 to +2 ergo oxidised and in the second Pb goes from+4 to +2 ergo reduced.

Ahh!! I get it now, thanks! I've just got one query about this, for the sulphate ions, when is it alright to place them in both half equations?

charmanderp

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3209
  • Respect: +305
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2012, 05:22:19 pm »
+1

Pb (s) + PbO2 (s) + 4H+ (aq) + 2 SO4 (aq) -> 2PbSO4 (s) + 2H2O (l),

Sorry about that :), copying and pasting seemed to have removed that arrow. -_-
No worries! I assumed that's where the arrow would be, just wanted to confirm.

Pb(s) + SO4/2-(aq) --> PbSO4(s) + 2e-

PbO2(s) + SO4/2-(aq) + 4H+(aq) + 2e- --> PbSO4(s) + 2H2O(l)

In the first Pb goes from 0 to +2 ergo oxidised and in the second Pb goes from+4 to +2 ergo reduced.

Ahh!! I get it now, thanks! I've just got one query about this, for the sulphate ions, when is it alright to place them in both half equations?
I don't understand your question, sorry!
University of Melbourne - Bachelor of Arts majoring in English, Economics and International Studies (2013 onwards)

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #17 on: September 02, 2012, 10:22:40 am »
0
For the question, 'A solution calorimeter was calibrated with 105ml of water instead of 100ml. The calorimeter was emtpied, and then used to determine the Heat of reaction of Powdered Zinc in 100ml of HCL, it can be deduced from this information that....'

I'm having trouble understanding why the answer is, 'lower and heat of reaction should be lower'.

charmanderp

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3209
  • Respect: +305
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #18 on: September 02, 2012, 04:00:28 pm »
+1
Ooook. So let's start from the beginning.

CF is equal to E/dT. Energy is calculated by SHC*m*dH. Since in this case we're using a mass of 105g rather than 100g we're going to have a greater CF than what we should.

Therefore when we try to calculate energy for heat of reaction (HoR=E/n) for the HCL reaction we're going to obtain a larger value for E than what we should, when we multiply an overestimated CF by dT. Hence when you divide your overestimated E by n you'll get a higher value for heat of reaction that you should.
University of Melbourne - Bachelor of Arts majoring in English, Economics and International Studies (2013 onwards)

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #19 on: September 03, 2012, 06:16:20 pm »
0
Thanks for that! Makes more sense now.

Another question, is there a reason we can electroplate objects  using Silver nitrate solution? I'm looking at the Electrochemical Series and assumed water would be preferentially reduced.


stephanieteddy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Respect: +2
  • School: copperfield college
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #20 on: September 03, 2012, 09:21:55 pm »
0
Hello!

Since galvanic cells require a negative gradient on the electrochemical series for a reaction to occur,

Does that mean electrolysis requires a positive gradient?
2011: Biology
2012: Chemistry - Specialist - Methods - Japanese - English

Howzat

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Respect: 0
  • School: MHS
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2012, 12:49:31 pm »
+1
^, Yeah, electrolysis does need a positive gradient.

(Just adding more stuff to make my post seem more complete ^_^)

Think about if the oxidant was below the reductant, then a spontaneous reaction would not occur.

Applying electricity to this will force a reaction to occur and hence, the oxidant will be forced to undergo reduction whilst the reductant will be forced to undergo oxidation!

;D , It definitely makes sense now that I think about it. :)
2011: Biology
2012: English, Economics, Methods, Accounting, Chemistry

2013: Bachelor of Commerce - Monash University

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #22 on: September 12, 2012, 08:51:59 pm »
0
For the following reaction:
CO(g) + 2H2(g) -> CH3OH(g), decreasing the pressure would have what effect on the mole/concentration of H2(g)?

I always thought that if we decreased pressure, system moves backwards to increase pressure, hence there will be more mol of H2 gas and a higher concentration. Yet the ans says that the mol would increase but the concentration decreases, I always based my poor logic (:)) on the formula c=n/v, and if mole is increased, concentration increases.

charmanderp

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3209
  • Respect: +305
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #23 on: September 12, 2012, 10:20:12 pm »
0
The number of moles increases but a change in pressure comes about due to a change in volume. Hence if you decrease the pressure you must have increased the volume, and even if you then increase the number of moles it's possible to still have a concentration lower than the original, and this will indeed be the case as concentration, when being re-established to equilibrium, never exceeds what it was originally. Always best to draw graphs for things like this if you don't understand.
University of Melbourne - Bachelor of Arts majoring in English, Economics and International Studies (2013 onwards)

Bhootnike

  • Chief Curry Officer
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1332
  • Biggest Sharabi
  • Respect: +75
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #24 on: September 12, 2012, 10:31:39 pm »
0
ideal gas equation - pV=nRT
if pressure decreases, then volume decreases.
if pressure or volume decrease, then n increases.

thats how i do it.
btw did the answer mention anything about which reaction would be favoured?
in response to you saying it moves backwards, i thought that if n(h2) increases, then system acts as to partially offset this initial increase in (h2) by subsequently decreasing (h2), which is achieved by favouring the forward reaction, since h2 is consumed.
2011: Biol - 42
2012: Spesh |Methods |Chemistry |English Language| Physics
2014: Physiotherapy
khuda ne jab tujhe banaya hoga, ek suroor uske dil mein aaya hoga, socha hoga kya doonga tohfe mein tujhe.... tab ja ke usne mujhe banaya hoga

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #25 on: September 19, 2012, 07:25:56 pm »
0
For the self-ionisation of water, why is it that, increasing temperature would increase concentration of Hydronium and therefore decrease pH, yet the solution remains neutral still?

Hancock

  • SUPER ENGINEERING MAN
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • Respect: +270
  • School: Ringwood Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #26 on: September 22, 2012, 03:22:13 am »
0
The solution remains neutral because the [H3O+] = [OH-]. Even though the ph =/= 7, it can still be neutral.
Thinking of doing Engineering? - Engineering FAQs

2012 - 2014: B.Sc. - Mechanical Systems - The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2014: Cross-Institutional Study - Aero/Mech Engineering - Monash University
2015 - 2016: M.Eng (Mechanical with Business) - The University of Melbourne
2015 - Sem1: Exchange Semester - ETH Zurich

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #27 on: October 09, 2012, 08:07:53 am »
0
For concentration-time graphs, does the addition of a catalyst, increase or decrease the amounts of the reactants?

nisha

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1247
  • Hum Honge Kamyab.
  • Respect: +117
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #28 on: October 09, 2012, 11:49:39 am »
0
A catalyst has no effect on the amounts of reactants, it merely increases the reation rate.
Melbourne University-Science-Second year

Am taking in students for CHEMISTRY and MATHS METHODS tuition for 2014 as well as first year chemistry. If interested, pm me. Flexible with location.

"Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught [/i]

generalkorn12

  • Guest
Re: Generalkorn12 Question Thread.
« Reply #29 on: October 17, 2012, 08:19:02 am »
0
Hi agian, I'm having trouble understanding the following questions:

a) Steady current is passed on three cells, containing solutions, Pb(NO3), AgNO3 and Al(NO3), the molar ratio of n(Pb):n(Ag):n(Al) deposited at the negative electrode is:

b) 0.5mol of Cu2+ and 1mol of Ag+ are added to an electrolytic cell, the quantity of electricity to deposit all of the copper and silver are?
(I've always thought, we'd determine the electron requirements for both, and add, as that would be the total required)

c). 400mL of 0.2M Sulfuric and 400ml of 0.2 KOH released 4.56kJ. The energy released for 400mL of 0.2M Sulfuric Acid is mixed with 800mL of 0.2M KOH is...?
(For this question, would it be 4.56kJ, as Sulfuric Acid is the limiting reagent?)