Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 24, 2024, 05:12:04 am

Poll

Which UMAT candiate would perform better, in your opinion?

Good alrounder, not amazing in any one section but does quite decent in all sections
31 (62%)
Genius in one section and average in the other two sections
19 (38%)

Total Members Voted: 42

Author Topic: Which UMAT candiate would perform better in your opinion?  (Read 6295 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Respect: +410
Re: Which UMAT candiate would perform better in your opinion?
« Reply #30 on: July 16, 2012, 07:16:15 pm »
0
I hate Section 1.

I need more than one opinion on this, but according to an old boy who did the UMAT, there are less problem solving questions (and much easier problem solving questions) on the actual UMAT than the MedEntry exams? Was that only for last year's exam?
« Last Edit: July 16, 2012, 07:34:37 pm by Shenz0r »
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne

Charmz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Respect: +16
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Which UMAT candiate would perform better in your opinion?
« Reply #31 on: July 16, 2012, 09:28:51 pm »
+1
Yeah, I'm not a big fan of S1 either. I personally think it's the hardest.

Surgeon

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
  • Determined to score a 50 in English.
  • Respect: +2
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Which UMAT candiate would perform better in your opinion?
« Reply #32 on: July 17, 2012, 10:30:23 am »
0
I hate Section 1.

I need more than one opinion on this, but according to an old boy who did the UMAT, there are less problem solving questions (and much easier problem solving questions) on the actual UMAT than the MedEntry exams? Was that only for last year's exam?

Bump for the sake that I'd really like to know the answer to this!
Aspiring doctor. Why? For the same four reasons as everybody else. Chicks, money, power and chicks.

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Which UMAT candiate would perform better in your opinion?
« Reply #33 on: July 17, 2012, 11:23:35 am »
0
I need more than one opinion on this, but according to an old boy who did the UMAT, there are less problem solving questions (and much easier problem solving questions) on the actual UMAT than the MedEntry exams? Was that only for last year's exam?

I found them around the same, but a little shorter in passage length.

Charmz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Respect: +16
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Which UMAT candiate would perform better in your opinion?
« Reply #34 on: July 17, 2012, 06:04:57 pm »
0
^ Oh good. I find it difficult to finish in time without rushing that section.

sha0017

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Cranbourne Secondary
Re: Which UMAT candiate would perform better in your opinion?
« Reply #35 on: July 21, 2012, 08:55:55 pm »
0
off topic but does raw score 70 give 100% percentile? I myself aiming for 80.

70 is 99%ile, 74 is 100%ile based off last year :)

80 is a huge score btw, only illuminati has got that from AN :P
How many practice materials should a person go through? (your suggestion)
And also with my time allocation should I spend all/most my time on Section 1+3 with the exception of a little focus on section 2. I do have very good people skills thanks to my work place, so your suggestions?

And thanks for previous posts.