You can't hold back things to preserve a few jobs, thats one of the reasons blacksmiths or farriers barely exist anymore. There were probably too many pharmacies to begin with. Plus, most of the time the pharmacist is just dispensing scripts and occasionally handing out advice. If you look through history their role was much much bigger than it is now. I see it just as things adjusting themselves with the whole chemist warehouse thing.
Couldn't agree more.
Additionally, with the exception of clinical hospital pharmacy, much of the profession is redundant as a result of how pharmaceuticals are produced and regulated, and how legally defensible pharmacy is practised. Much of community pharmacy could be practised by a dispensary tech.
Pharmacists are not remunerated for the use of most of their skills. They are qualified to give an array of health advice, but the payment for this is the margin they make on products they sell to their
patients customers. Extensive medication counselling- which is arguably the most important role of a pharmacist - is almost never remunerated. The minimal legal requirement for dispensing advice is on a computer screen. Seems redundant and undervalued to me. I suspect the legislated monopoly they have on pharmacy ownership is pretty much the only thing keeping the profession alive outside of hospitals.
The Pharmacy Guilds were also moronic for not moving with the times. As they gradually became more focused on the retail aspect of pharmacy, they failed to take action to enable the profession to adapt.
For instance, the highest expert authority on drug use, evaluation and prescribing is a
medical (physician) specialist called a
Clinical Pharmacologist. Just as a maxillofacial surgeon needs both medical and dental degrees, I think there could be a strong argument for clinical pharmacologists to have both medical and pharmacy degrees. Missed opportunity if you ask me :S